"...it is important to talk to Russia. [...] Because first it is our neighbor, and also because it is important that we have a stable relationship with this country, (inaudible). And it is in the name of these principles that we would like to maintain this dialogue. It does not prevent us from standing firm, like we said earlier.

But of course, Europe, as well, need to talk to Russia at a high level, and mainly because there is a major issue, which is arms control.

And over the past few month, we witnessed the de-organization – deconstruction of the regulation system of weapons that – the system that was put in place in – at the end of the ’90s on the strategic armaments. And luckily, we have New START being extended, but we also have the issue of the intermediate nuclear forces.

And all of these regulations are a matter of security to prevent any accident or incidence, to provide some relative transparency. All of that does not exist anymore, so this is what is at stake – the interest to rebuild, to begin to rebuild all of that.

It was discussed by President Biden and President Putin, and this is what we will be working on together based on a common agenda.

So we need to talk to have a strategic stability, to have relational stability between the Europeans and the great neighbor. And all of the initiatives aiming at talking with a willingness of dialogue are there.

And they’re not – the Americans, while they’re specialist in dialogue with Russia, and the Europeans are special experts in sanctions, we need both, and this is what we’re doing."
French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian at a joint press conference with US Secretary of State Tony Blinken June 25, 2021

"...regarding the very character of the sanctions.

First, for any sanction to be legal it needs to be authorized by the UN Security Council. But this is not happening, so they are illegal. This is the first point.

And now the second point that I consider the most important one. For some reason nobody imposes sanctions for interfering in the domestic affairs of other countries, for disrupting internal political life or for shattering entire states.

Nobody imposes sanctions against those who reduce countries to a position where they are compelled to take certain measures to protect their interests.

...Sanctions (if we want them to work) are a tool which must be in the sole possession of the United Nations Security Council. All other matters should be resolved through dialogue rather than imposing one’s own agenda on other countries. That is all there is to it...

...Today, sanctions are being used not as a tool of geopolitical struggle but simply as an element of competition. Take Nord Stream 2, for example. Our US friends are fighting it. But it is definitely profitable for our European partners. “No, do not build it!” [the Americans say] ...We have already worked with Turkey to build TurkStream along the Black Sea bed. TurkStream will launch later this year.

Yet we still cannot come to terms with the Europeans.

Our US partners opposed, in exactly the same way, the “pipes for gas” project in the 1960s that we pursued with the Federal Republic of Germany. It was exactly the same.

It was the same with Nord Stream 1. What would global energy look like now if there were no Nord Stream 1? I can give you the answer. Prices would be even higher than they are now, simple as that. Do you want to buy mineral resources at higher prices? No."
Vladimir Putin 9 April 2019

"We have for years promoted relations [with the EU], doing this in a sincere and pragmatic manner. These relations were aimed at integrating things, minimising costs, engaging in mutually beneficial cooperation in a number of areas.  

Regrettably, this largely fruitful work was stymied by the West, by the Brussels elite, who are fully at Washington’s beck and call. European nations, citizens of European countries have nothing to do with this blockade. 

Why did this happen? Because peaceful, mutually beneficial and effective coexistence on the European continent is a nightmare for the United States! Because it means they will be unable to find competitive advantages or fish in troubled waters. No! Any kind of US domination will be out of the question.

As of today, “divide and rule” is the sinister, frightful 21st-century logic, with its conscious intention to sow chaos and attempt to rule.  

We were proceeding from pragmatic decisions that were necessary for our national interests.  Let me remind you that the EU was created as the European Coal and Steel Community; integration in other areas was launched later, with the ECSC transformed into the European Economic Community and subsequently the European Union with a common currency. It all seemed well and good until it dawned on someone in Washington that Europe acquiring its own strong currency and a totally independent energy system was unheard-of impudence.

Can you imagine what it means for the US “deep state” to understand that Europe is energy independent and has its own mineral resources and technologies to produce and deliver these to any location in Europe and neighbouring regions. 

It means leaving the United States out in the cold.

Obviously, they could not afford it, because they have no competitive advantage left to them other than the capacity to wreak havoc.  

So, everything was done, as we understand now, to transform the EU from an independent economic integration system into an economic division of NATO, to destroy ties, and deal a blow to the entire edifice of European unity, which we observed."
Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova   8 June 2022

"Washington demands more and more sanctions against Russia and the majority of European politicians obediently go along with it. They clearly understand that by pressuring the EU to completely give up Russian energy and other resources, the United States is practically pushing Europe toward deindustrialisation in a bid to get its hands on the entire European market.

These European elites understand everything – they do, but they prefer to serve the interests of others. This is no longer servility but direct betrayal of their own peoples. God bless, it is up to them."
President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin 30 September 2022


"Those “gentlemen” have indeed made quite a mess, often hurting themselves in the process, primarily the Europeans. Making Europe “not great” is an undeclared objective of any US administration as it seeks to eliminate competitors, including Russia, China, and everyone else."
Sergey Lavrov 16 January 2025

"Sanctions are a silent form of warfare. They target ordinary people.  And when it comes to Iran, the United States under Obama imposed maximum pressure sanctions...Obama I think, called them 'crippling sanctions' so his objective was to cripple Iranians, because it wasn't targeting any particular person - a leader, a parliamentarian, a president, it was targeting the whole country.

And Trump, of course, when he reinstated the maximum pressure sanctions, he called them 'brutal sanctions' so he wanted to brutalize Iranians.

The impact is has been very significant, of course. From the very beginning of the Revolution when Iran began to pursue an independent foreign policy...the United States sanctioned the country, and over the years those sanctions increased ...

The United States supported Saddam Hussein in invading Iran and so did US allies. US allies provided Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons to use against Iran, the United States gave the military intelligence to use those chemical weapons, and they collectively gave Saddam Hussein the political cover to get away with it. And many, many, thousands of Iranians died. Many, many, thousands of Iraqis who opposed Saddam Hussein died because of these chemical weapons, which were mostly given to the Iraqi regime - to Saddam Hussein - by the Germans...

I personally survived two of those chemical attacks, both mustard gas and also a nerve agent, in two different years of the war. And of course many others didn't. And some people suffered for many, many, years. Some are still dying as we speak, because some of these chemical weapons gradually destroy the lung of the victim, or the  lungs of the victim. So, for example, just a few years ago the brother of a colleague of mine at University - a person who's in my department - he died of chemical weapons. So imagine how many years he suffered, and how many years his family suffered as a result.

But back then Iran was sanctioned so that Iran wasn't allowed to import gas masks. So they were blocking Iran from purchasing the gas masks and chemicals and machines that could stop the the the gas from killing people - and from spreading. 

Those were sanctions. But the ...sanctions that were imposed were not just the sanctions to aid Saddam Hussein, they were to block the economy, to shut down the economy. Factories would slow down, less goods would be produced, prices would go up, people would lose their jobs, people would become impoverished, families would break up, people would suffer, presumably some would commit suicide, some would become thieves (because they have to survive).

So sanctions objective is to break down society, to have people die, to have the social network and civil society fall apart.

That is the whole objective. It is a silent form of war...

Obama, when he saw that he's not going to get anywhere......a deal was signed. But immediately the Americans began to violate the deal.  And Iranian Banks were supposed to be able to function normally with banks across the world. It never happened. The Americans were determined to cheat Iran...the United States violated the deal from the very beginning, and then of course later on Trump tore up the deal and reimposed those 'maximum pressure' sanctions - which continue to be imposed today...

....sometimes you get a shortage of medicine. My father, for example, who's had a severe heart condition for almost four decades , sometimes he cannot find his medicine and....if there's a shortage of a particular type of medicine. if you can find medicine that's expired he'll use it.  That happens. But of course  as time has gone by and especially under the Raisi Administration the impact of these sanctions has begun to decrease, there's no doubt about that. We have had economic growth -  significant economic growth for the last couple of years over 4% ...

...but we still have these problems and these shortages, and so the intention is to kill people, is to make people suffer, so that Iranians become so desperate that they would rise up against the government. The same policy is being pursued in Venezuela, in Cuba, in Syria, and elsewhere.

They target ordinary people to get what they want. It's very much like the mafia. They behave like the mafia, the United States and it allies, when it comes to anyone who opposes their policies."
Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi, University of Tehran on Lena Petrova Youtube Channel 17 June 2024

"On 21 November 1806, Napoleon, by issuing the Berlin Decree, enacted the world-largest embargo ever against the United Kingdom. The Berlin Decree established the so-called Continental System, a Europe-wide blockade forbidding France-aligned European countries to import British goods.   

Initially the embargo seemed to work: the British withdrew from Europe and in a few months the exports to the continent fell by half.

But over time the British found three ways to break the international isolation: circumvention, diversification and diversion. In a few years the UK was capable of replacing the trade with Europe by deepening the ties with overseas colonies and the rest of the world. A life-threatening challenge was turned into a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to create a still existing symbiotic metropolis-peripheries relationship – ie the Commonwealth.

While the UK gradually recovered from the blockade, France-centered Continental System suffered more and more because of Europe's over-reliance on British imports, from textile to technology. The economic troubles fueled smuggling, prompting Napoleon to intervene, even militarly, as it occurred in Spain. But, eventually, sabotage and imperial overstretch weakened Paris' capability of controlling the Old Continent and quickened Napoleon's downfall.

The UK experienced a pre-modern economic encirclement, a pre-modern form of containment, and turned the isolation from Europe, which was London's main trade partner, into an opportunity to expand into new markets, to strengthen national industries, and to shape its future vital space.

Napoleon's desires never materialised: the UK experienced no high inflation, no stagnation, no economic crisis, no bankruptcy. Conversely, the Continental System would prove crucial in fueling the UK's extraordinary political and economic growth throughout the 19th century."
Emanuel Pietrobon, Geopolitical Analyst, 5 May 2022

"The first thing I think is they got the idea of sanctions as being a knockout blow absolutely wrong because sanctions have been applied repeatedly by the United States and they've essentially never been a knockout blow.

Even when sanctions have done damage to a national economy - and they certainly have in many cases - it hasn't been a knockout blow, from a political point of view, or from any kind of fundamental foreign policy point of view.

The U.S imposed very tough and very harmful sanctions against Venezuela, for example, to try to depose president Maduro, and to install an American chosen president. This utterly failed of course.

The U.S has imposed sanctions on many countries around the world and the foreign policy returns, just judging from the American foreign policy objective - that is not the right or wrong of the objective - has failed repeatedly.

Sanctions don't work.

They do sometimes even cripple an economy, but they don't change the political Dynamics, they don't change the geopolitical dynamic. Now, when it comes to Russia, the idea that this would be some kind of a 'knockout blow' for the conflict in Ukraine was utterly naive and predictably a failure.

But I think the Russian economy also was clearly vastly underestimated, and what the West gets wrong on all aspects of the Ukraine crisis, is that the world is not united with the West.

The West is just a small part of the world. Most of the world wants to stay clear of this crisis. In fact, wants this war to end, of course, but is continuing normal economic financial and foreign policy relations with Russia.

That's the basic point. So that Russia not only has vast domestic capacity in the economy which Western analysts underestimated, but it has continuing trade links with most of the world. ...the sanctions regime is generally a failure.

And in the case of Russia it failed in two fundamental ways. One, not achieving at all the aims of the sanctions and [two] not even hindering the Russian economy to any significant extent.

Well, clearly Russia has a lot of resilience, because it has a vast food production base, it has a vast minerals base, it has a vast industrial base. The Assumption in the West was that it did not have a high-tech base so as was said by the German foreign minister, I believe, Russia would be scrounging washing machines imported from Germany to get the chips for its military capacity...

These kinds of absurdities were part of the mythology. And Russia's high-tech capacities were clearly constantly neglected and discounted though Russia obviously has a very sophisticated digital industry, and that's both for civilian and for military purposes. So there was a a lot of ignorance, I would say, in the west, or make-believe, or wish fulfillment in Western capitals - especially Washington - about what Russia can and can't do, and what would happen with the sanctions.

I remember at the start of the sanctions, of course, in the conversations that I had with Washington, they really did believe this was the the the absolute definitive weapon - cutting Russia out of SWIFT - this was gonna be 'it'. This was somehow so dramatic it would decisively end the conflict.

Aah, completely naive.
Professor Jeffrey Sachs 15 September 2023  'Why Western Sanctions Against Russia Failed', New Rules podcast

"We tried to build up relations with the leading countries of the West and with NATO. The message was the same: let us stop being enemies, let us live together as friends, let us engage in dialogue, let us build trust, and, hence, peace. We were absolutely sincere, I want to emphasise that. We clearly understood the complexity of this rapprochement, but we agreed to it.

What did we get in response? In short, we got a ”no“ in all the main areas of possible cooperation.

We received an ever-increasing pressure on us and hotbeds of tension near our borders...

The goal was to make Russia more vulnerable...

...they try to turn everyone into a tool, in order to use these tools for their own purposes. And those who do not yield to this pressure, who do not want to be such a tool are sanctioned: all sorts of economic restrictions are carried out against them and in relation of them, coups are prepared or where possible carried out and so on.

And in the end, if nothing at all can be done, the aim is the same: to destroy them, to wipe them off the political map.

But it has not and will never be possible to draft and implement such a scenario with respect to Russia.

...Russia is not challenging the Western elites. Russia is simply upholding its right to exist and to develop freely.

Importantly, we will not become a new hegemon ourselves. Russia is not suggesting replacing a unipolar world with a bipolar, tripolar or other dominating order, or replacing Western domination with domination from the East, North or South. This would inevitably lead to another impasse.

....Let me recall that the Western civilisation is not the only one even in our common Eurasian space. Moreover, the majority of the population is concentrated in the east of Eurasia, where the centres of the oldest human civilisations emerged.

The value and importance of Eurasia lies in the fact that it represents a self-sufficient complex possessing huge resources of all kinds and tremendous opportunities. The more we work on increasing the connectivity of Eurasia and creating new ways and forms of cooperation, the more impressive achievements we make.

The successful performance of the Eurasian Economic Union, the fast growth of the authority and prestige of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, the large-scale One Belt, One Road initiatives, plans for multilateral cooperation in building the North-South transport corridor and many other projects, are the beginning of a new era, new stage in the development of Eurasia. I am confident of this.

Integration projects there do not contradict but supplement each other – of course, if they are carried out by neighbouring countries in their own interests rather than introduced by outside forces with the aim of splitting the Eurasian space and turning it into a zone of bloc confrontation.

Europe, the Western extremity of the Greater Eurasia could also become its natural part.

But many of its leaders are hampered by the conviction that the Europeans are superior to others, that it is beneath them to take part as equals in undertakings with others. This arrogance prevents them from seeing that they have themselves become a foreign periphery and actually turned into vassals, often without the right to vote

...Do you know what’s really important? ... to have the European part regain its legal capacity...Helmut Kohl told me...that if European civilization wanted to keep going as a global centre, it should definitely work with Russia. "
Vladimir Putin 27 October 2022

An Apartheid International Trading System

"We lost faith in our Western colleagues’ negotiation skills and dependability after 2014, when Crimea-related sanctions were imposed on us...Since then, we have been relying on ourselves and our contacts and connections with dependable partners. As a result of the measures we had taken, we became an agricultural powerhouse. For many years before that, we had been importing large amounts of food."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov  4 June 2022

"Even before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, all the U.S.' major Western trading partners agreed that there must be significant systemic reforms to the WTO's structure and rules to make it a functioning institution.

China and to a lesser degree Russia's presence in the WTO, along with the WTO's own rules, however, make reforming the institution virtually impossible.

Therefore, any consideration of real reform must include eliminating the institution and starting over...By withdrawing PNTR status for certain WTO members, the U.S. is recognizing that it can no longer remain shackled to a framework that no longer functions properly. If the institution is unable to force reform because of the gridlock created by its own rules, then it is time to consider abandoning the institution.
Withdrawing PNTR is a first step in creating a system for countries that adhere to Western democratic ideals."
Robert DeFrancesco, American lawyer

"We drew a lesson from all this, which is to never again rely on these people.

This does not mean that we will stop talking to them. We’ll see what they have to tell us when they get over the current insanity.

Under no circumstances, from here to eternity, will we ever let any critical sphere of our country or our people’s lives depend on Western investment or technology."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov  4 June 2022


"Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?"
George Washington, Farewell Address, 17 September 1796

"Events of this year confirm the special significance of such a factor as accessible and affordable raw materials without which it is impossible to organise any production process or to set up co-production chains. Russia is just about the only country that is completely self-sufficient in terms of natural resources, and the Far East plays a substantial role here. This region is a highly important supplier of crude oil and natural gas, coal, metals, timber and marine biological resources to the domestic market and our foreign partners.

We are staking on the prudent and rational development of Russia’s natural riches under the most stringent environmental standards. First of all, we will refine all extracted raw materials domestically as much as possible. We will also use these raw materials to strengthen the sovereignty of this country, to ensure industrial security, to raise incomes and to develop the regions.

We have already protected the resource extraction industry from unfriendly actions. From now on, only companies with Russian jurisdiction have the right to develop natural resources in Russia.

The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment together with the Ministry of Industry and Trade and leading business associations has determined the national economy’s demand for strategic raw materials. This information will become the foundation of the revised Strategy for the Development of Russia’s Mineral Resources Base with an extended planning horizon up to 2050."
Vladimir Putin, 7 September 2022

• Russia is uniquely able to run a sovereign currency that is indexed to the value of real commodities.
• The Central bank of Russia uses gold (in part) to regulate the supply and value of the ruble.
• The 'illiquid' ruble means that foreign speculators cannot influence its value.
• Import substitution by new domestic producers, or from suppliers in friendly countries means Russia will import fewer and fewer goods from the west. Therefore western commercial bank treasuries will only be able to hold limited ruble reserves. They will have to come to Russia with gold or acceptable foreign currency if they want more.
• Friendly countries will likely export more goods to Russia, and have better access to ruble reserves. The gross domestic product (based on purchasing power parity) of the eight countries that either refused to apply western 'sanctions' plus 'sanctioned' countries - China, India, Russia, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Iran, and Turkiye – is greater than the G7 nations (US, UK, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, and Canada).
  
• If a Eurasian Monetary Fund is created, 'friendly country' currencies will gain some resilience.
• Russia is creating a very stable, carefully controlled currency, with enduring purchasing power - but a currency that is only spent domestically and regionally.

"...Under the Executive Order, if the Russian Federation and/or Russian legal entities or individuals are stripped of their ownership rights regarding properties in the foreign states that are targeting the Russian Federation or its legal entities or individuals, with unfriendly actions, and/or if the Russian Federation and/or Russian legal entities or individuals are stripped of their property titles, as well as when these rights are subject to any restrictions or there is a threat of being deprived of these rights, facing restrictions, and threats to Russia’s national, economic, energy and other kinds of security, its defence capability, an interim administration shall be instituted regarding the following assets:

a) movable goods and properties located in Russia and belonging to foreign parties with ties to unfriendly countries (including if these foreign parties are citizens or residents of these countries or if they have their registered addresses in these countries, or principal place of business or if they derive most of their profits from operating in these countries), and also those belonging to the parties controlled by the said foreign parties;

b) foreign-held securities, shares in authorised (joint) capital of Russian legal entities held by parties from unfriendly foreign countries;

c) property rights held by parties from unfriendly foreign countries.

The Executive Order sets forth a list of movable goods and properties, securities and shares in authorised (joint) capitals of Russian legal entities, as well as property rights subject to interim administration measures.

The document designates the Federal Agency for State Property Management as the interim administrator and also sets forth its authority.

Under the Executive Order, the President of the Russian Federation decides when to terminate the interim administration.
Presidential Executive Order 25 April 2023

"Question: It has recently come to light that the Prosecutor’s Office of Germany is seeking the seizure of Russian assets in favour of Germany’s own budget. Was this expected? How can we retaliate?...

Sergey Lavrov: I see. They have “independent” courts after all. Why not try and make this demand? 

They are a thievish kind of people. We realised this long ago. 

Earlier, they were thievish politically (in the sense of going back on commitments and trying to cheat), but now we can use this word, thievish, literally.

They are scampering to find some legal avenues to confiscate Russian assets. Or, as a first step, they plan to confiscate the profits derived from these assets and send them to Ukraine. Despite this, the Europeans still maintain some semblance of respect for their own laws. That is why they are delaying these decisions.

According to our information, the Americans are secretly advising them on how to change their laws so that they can ultimately steal these funds. We will wait and see.

Commenting on a similar issue, Finance Minister of Russia Anton Siluanov said that if such confiscation were to take place, we would retaliate by  confiscating their assets in Russia."
Sergey Lavrov 24 December 2023

"We always want to make sure that any sanctions that we put in place can at some point - if behavior changes - be reversed in order to make sure that threat actor knows that once sanctions are put in place, the goal is behavioral change ultimately"
- US Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo 17 April 2022

".Yesterday, I had a conversation with Indian Prime Minister. He had visited the Piskarevskoye Memorial Cemetery, where almost 400,000 residents of Leningrad were buried, most of them civilians. They died during the siege of Leningrad.

They starved to death.

And buried in one of those graves is my older brother whom I have never seen.

And I will never forget that, just like I will never forget the state in which this country was in the early 1990s."
Vladimir Putin 5 June 2017

"5,787 new restrictions have been imposed against Russian legal entities and individuals since February 22, and their number has reached more than 8,500 in total. No other country has ever had so many restrictions imposed on it. Even Iran, which has been under sanctions for more than 40 years, comes in a distant second, with only 3,600."
- RT, 12 April 2022


"The war that the West has unleashed against us with Ukraine’s hands and bodies is a hybrid war in which unilateral restrictions or sanctions are allotted a special role. The number of anti-Russia sanctions is over an unprecedented 17,000. The goals are not hidden – to undermine the Russian economy, compel our political leadership to give up its independent foreign policy line, and set the people against the authorities. These goals are openly declared. When problems of unilateral restrictions are discussed generally, the West always vows that its policy does not target sanctions against civilians. This is a lie. They are doing exactly the opposite. They want to provoke riots and incite the people against the authorities. The West pursues similar policies in many countries...

...We understand perfectly well that the sanctions imposed on us will not disappear in the foreseeable or even distant future. Those behind the sanctions acknowledge this as well. Frankly, we don't need them to.

It’s not because we choose isolationism or autarky, not at all. It's because the West has decided to destroy the global economy in order to teach Russia a lesson..."
Sergey Lavrov, 8 November 2023


"...we have been working on since the beginning of the special military operation has to do with countering sanctions. It was no easy matter, of course, considering that over 16,000 sanctions have been imposed on Russia. Over that period, we have adopted 192 laws and worked with the Government to take more than 300 measures to support our people, enterprises and regions."
State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin, 31 July 2023

1.1 Prohibit or physically block the import of Russian goods

"...if oil falls below $40, oil production profitability and extraction growth will be questioned. Of course, technology is advancing, and the cost of such production will drop and fall below $40 a barrel; maybe it will be at $35–40 – but oil production costs are lower in Russia anyway, let alone gas; I won’t even cite figures so that I don’t scare anyone. It is much lower than in the United States or Europe, and even in certain oil-producing countries in the Middle East"

• "Crude oil: China has bought 47% of Russia’s crude exports, followed by India (37%), the EU (6%), and Turkey (6%).
• Oil products: Turkey, the largest buyer, has purchased 25% of Russia’s oil product exports, followed by China (12%), and Brazil (11%).
• LNG: The EU was the largest buyer, purchasing 48% of Russia’s LNG exports, followed by China (22%), and Japan (18%).
• Pipeline gas: The EU was the largest buyer, purchasing 40% of Russia’s pipeline gas, followed by China (28%), and Turkey (26%)."

"You mentioned restrictions. Yes, they do exist and they are harmful, of course, as well as sanctions, and everything else, but they cannot stop the process of Arctic development.

To reiterate, no matter how the sanction tools work, the first shipment from Yamal LNG went to the United States. Funny, but true. And, I believe, trade continues uninterrupted as well.

Because whenever our US partners and friends can benefit from something, they make whatever it is happen. If they find it is not lucrative, then they tend to tighten the screws. But only if they do not find it lucrative for themselves. They have not been paying much attention to the interests of other countries lately."
Vladimir Putin 9 April 2019

"At a government meeting on May 26, measures to ban the provision of architectural and engineering services were approved on the basis of the measures to freeze assets and other measures against those related to Russia, taking into account the impact on Japanese companies present in Russia, Tokyo has decided to take the necessary measures to ensure the stable operation of projects important for Japan's energy security, the ministry said in a statement. "Service operations, which the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry has identified as particularly necessary to ensure the energy security of our country, are not the object of these measures," ...adding that this applies to such projects as called Sakhalin-1, Sakhalin-2 and Arctic LNG-2."
Sputnik news 30 June 2023


“Last week, for instance, we levelled new sanctions against the Arctic LNG 2, which is Novatek’s flagship project. Our objective is to kill that project, and we are doing that through our sanctions, working with our partners in the Group of Seven and beyond..."
Geoffrey Pyatt, USA Assistant Secretary of State for Energy Resources, commenting on the Arctic LNG-2 project 9 November 2023 


 "Question: Washington has announced their intention to stop the Arctic LNG 2 project. Assistant Secretary for Energy Resources Geoffrey Pyatt said during the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing that their “objective is to kill that project.” Would you comment on that?

Maria Zakharova: I have a question too. Will they blow the project up or do something else? Will they smother or otherwise destroy it? What are their options?

I can only describe this as the United States’ admission that they have no scruples about destroying civilian energy infrastructure.

I regard this as proof that the Western countries, primarily the United States, are behind the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipeline bombings in one way or another. That attack began with similar statements by the US president and State Department officials about bringing an end to these facilities. Six months later, that infrastructure was blown up. They are now threatening other energy facilities.

Other proof concerns the competitive advantages of Arctic LNG 2 compared to the US, just like with Nord Stream. Unable to attain competitive advantages and seeing that they are losing the competition, they destroy everything that prevents them from surging forward. This is what happened to Nord Stream 1 and 2. Unable to undermine the EU countries’ energy cooperation with Russia in Europe, which developed over decades and was beneficial, the Americans opted for threats and for implementing them. It is the only possible assessment of the situation.

This is Washington’s systematic approach to destroying civilian energy infrastructure. We understand that these are not isolated emotional statements by individual American officials but the systematic approach of the United States as a country.
Maria Zakharova 15 November 2023  

"In this context, the further development of the huge gas industry network created in the east of our country is becoming strategically important for Russia. This network includes the Yakutia and Irkutsk gas production centres, the Amur Gas Processing Plant, which is under construction, and the Power of Siberia gas pipeline, which was connected to new reserves with the launch of the Kovykta gas condensate field into commercial operation last December.

Overall, as far as international cooperation and export contracts are concerned, Gazprom is facing monumental challenges, having to rearrange its logistics routes and gain a foothold in new markets. Yesterday alone, I think Mr Miller and I spent about two hours discussing all these plans with our potential partners.

Let me emphasise that no matter how important international trade is, what matters the most to us is promoting our national development, providing for reliable, steady economic growth, shielding the national economy from any threats, and ensuring uninterrupted supplies for our enterprises and regions. Of course, this also includes improving the quality of life for people across all regions of Russia.

I believe the expanded programme of social gasification, when connection to gas distribution networks is brought right up to the land plot boundary, is one of the most important projects for Gazprom in terms of its social responsibility. Starting this year, the programme has no expiration date. In addition, it now covers social infrastructure, educational and medical institutions, as well as housing.

Let me remind you that certain categories of people can benefit from additional support. This includes families with many children and combat veterans. I am referring to subsidies people can obtain when buying services and gas equipment for their homes. We have already allocated federal funding to this effect"
Vladimir Putin 17 February 2023

"In September 2014...Restrictive measures forbade the US export of commodities, services and technologies to support deep-water, Arctic and shale projects of Gazprom, Gazprom Neft, LUKOIL, Rosneft and Surgutneftegas (Forbes 2014). The new US sanctions introduced in August 2017 applied to these five companies and forbade American citizens and companies from participating in their new projects both within and outside Russia (RBC 2017). However, Bogdanov commented that the sanctions would have little effect on Surgutneftegas since it did not have any debt denominated in foreign currencies, did not have any deep-water or (offshore) Arctic projects and had limited dependence on foreign technology (Neftegaz.ru 2014a)."
'Russian Oil Companies in an Evolving World'  Indra Overland and Nina Poussenkova

"The territory of the Russian Federation includes a vast sea shelf, which makes up almost 22% of the total area of the world’s ocean shelf, and 70% of this Russian sea shelf can be used to produce oil and gas. According to geological data, this territory contains about 56 billion tons of proven oil and gas resources and is forecasted to contain an extra 100–140 billion tons of oil and gas resources (in oil equivalents) [1,2].

For the Russian Federation, oil and gas production on the shelf of the northern seas and Sakhalin Island is an important strategic objective and, to a great extent, the economic situation in the country and its defense potential depends on whether this objective will be achieved.

It should be noted that foreign companies lack experience in oil and gas production on ice. The solution to the problem of developing a sea ice-resistant platform for operation on the shelf of the arctic seas and Sakhalin Island has no parallels in the world practice."
Poletskov et al 2019

"OECD Europe has refinery intake of roughly 11 million barrels a day. It has its own crude production of about some 3 million barrels a day. The remainder is imported. Of this, we have some 800,000 barrels a day of Russian crude flowing via Druzhba which will be difficult to replace initially, and another roughly 1.5 million barrels a day of Russian crude heading to OECD Europe via sea...So potentially a very large hole in the European balance..."
Neil Crosby analyst OilX 15 April 2022

"The United States is allocating oil from its strategic reserves – well, this is good, but they will have to be replenished and the market analysts understand this. Today, they have withdrawn oil from strategic reserves and tomorrow they will have to buy it again. We are hearing that they will buy when prices go down. But they are not going down. So what? Wake up! You will have to buy at high prices because prices have gone up again.
What do we have to do with this? These blunders in the energy sector were made by those who have to think about it and deal with it."
Vladimir Putin 27 October 2022

"While oil demand is expected to continue to rise, both seasonally and structurally over the remainder of the year, only a marginal increase in supply is foreseen. In May, world oil production fell by 660 kb/d to 100.6 mb/d. Deeper cuts from some OPEC+ producers kicked in while output from Iraq’s northern Kurdish region and some Canadian oil sands remained shut in. Saudi Arabia, with its voluntary cut of 500 kb/d agreed in April, led the monthly drop in world supply, but the overall decline was stemmed by a seasonal 330 kb/d rise in biofuels along with higher flows from Nigeria and elsewhere. The Kingdom has promised to slash output by a further 1 mb/d in July to a two-year low of 9 mb/d. Riyadh made the pledge at the 4 June OPEC+ meeting that rolled over the bloc’s existing curbs through 2024"
IEA Oil Marketing Report June 2023

"Why should Russia maintain oil production of 10 million bpd if we can (more) effectively consume and export 7 million-8 million bpd without losses to the state budget, domestic consumption? Which is better - to sell 10 barrels of crude for $50 or 7, but for $80?"
Leonid Fedun, Vice President Lukoil 30 May 2022

"Today's package contains a complete import ban on all Russian seaborne crude oil and petroleum products. This covers 90% of our current oil imports from Russia. The ban is subject to certain transition periods to allow the sector and global markets to adapt, and a temporary exemption for pipeline crude oil to ensure that Russian oil is phased out in an orderly fashion. This will allow the EU and its partners to secure alternative supplies and minimises the impact on global oil prices."
European Union press release 3 June 2022

"Member States who have a particular pipeline dependency on Russia can benefit from a temporary exemption and continue to receive crude oil delivered by pipeline, until the Council decides otherwise."
European Union press release 3 June 2022

"Croatian President Zoran Milanovic said that the sanctions didn’t work because they cut energy purchases from Russia, but global prices for energy are on the rise. As a result, Russia is receiving even more revenue than last year. Let them draw their conclusions. Clearly, they have finally started crunching the numbers and trying to figure out what they are doing and what are the consequences"
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov 1 June 2022

"Limited spare capacity in the global refining system, together with reduced exports of Russian fuel oil, diesel and naphtha have aggravated the tightness in product markets, which have now seen seven consecutive quarters of stock draws. While a first tranche of SPR releases halted the precipitous decline in OECD industry stocks in March, crude made up the majority of it and product stocks have continued to fall. Notably, middle distillate reserves reached their lowest levels since April 2008."
IEA May 2022 report

"Of course, these restrictions have a negative effect on us. But, first, we have different concessions for different markets. This is the first point. In some cases, these concessions are minimal.

Second, as I said, all these concessions affect global pricing one way or another, and overall, we are fully satisfied with the current pricing situation.

Production is on the rise, and we are also fully content with this situation inside the country. Sales volumes are considerable.

Yes, it has repercussions for budget revenues, without a doubt, as well as for gas prices and sales in certain markets, mainly European. But we are gradually replacing some markets with others, and it is by no means a disaster.

These developments encourage Russian companies to step up their game and search for new logistics channels and new partners, and they are succeeding.

Our companies have to boost their professionalism, if you wish. It is not enough to just deliver goods to a port and sell them. I do not want to dive into all their instruments, but our companies buy assets abroad and refine crude oil into oil products.

In general, the Russian oil and gas market is in good condition and has excellent development prospects.

...I must say that all the decisions within OPEC Plus on reducing production and other issues are first and foremost depoliticised. These decisions are not affected by Russia’s special military operation or any other opportunistic considerations. They are based on economic feasibility for both the producers and consumers. All in all, we manage to balance out the market together."
Vladimir Putin June 16, 2023

Backdown Record
#1 "...as part of the sixth sanctions package introduced last month, the EU imposed a partial embargo of Russian oil, banning sea shipments of oil to the EU and prohibiting European companies from insuring and reinsuring sea shipments of Russian oil and oil products to countries outside the European Union.

As a result, major energy players such as Vitol, Glencore, Trafigura, Shell and Total stopped trading Russian oil for third countries.

Now, however, they will be able to resume business with Russia. The legal details of the new provision will be published in the Official Journal of the EU"
RT 23 July 2022

#2 In early August the UK removed sanctions on insurance and reinsurance of ships carrying oil to third countries (not the the EU). The UK is the single major ship insurer in Europe. Russia has made it illegal to insure with 'unfriendly countries' anyway, and has developed it's own insurance businesses for it's own oil and LNG carriers. In January 2022 almost 70% of Russian oil shipments were insured by insurers EU and G7 countries insurers. By January 2024 that had dropped to only 30%. In other words, within 2 years, an astonishing 70% of oil cargoes shipped out of Russia were insured by insurers outside the western cabal.

Reversal: in early September 2022 the EU and UK (oil buyers) agreed they would 'cap' oil prices, and that any 'friendly country' buying oil from Russia at prices higher than the cap would result in withdrawal of insurance on the oil tankers and prohibition on using EU/UK ports to unload. This 'cap' is to start in December 2022. Obviously, the EU and UK don't control the international oil market. This 'initiative' has quite rightly been met with scorn and derision.

Petrochemical Industry First edited 28 Feb 2025
Russia's petrochemical industry was well developed in the Soviet times, but after the breakup of the Soviet Union the industry fell into disarray, and some of the plant was cut up for scrap. Russia has relied on imports for much of the essential chemicals it needs. The number of chemistry teachers in schools is decreasing, as is the number of students majoring in chemistry. In February 2025 the Russian President advocated for a system wide response involving industry, teachers, Universities and Institutions to develop plans to "ensure the country’s superiority, including in chemistry and modern materials science." This is in line with Russia's National Development Plan.

"...we know from our own negative experience what system-wide problems vulnerability in the chemical domain can create.

We literally had to reassemble many technological and production chains, and build new processing facilities to manufacture products with added value. For example, new facilities have been built as part of the Tobolsk Petrochemical Plant in the Tyumen Region. In 2019, a modern petrochemical plant, ZapSibNeftekhim, was launched. The construction of the Amur Gas Chemical Complex and other enterprises is underway. They will enable Russia to significantly increase the production of polymers, a key product of oil and gas chemistry, in the coming years.

I would also like to add that after cleaning up and reclaiming territory in Usolye-Sibirskoye, Irkutsk Region, we plan to create a modern federal centre for small- and medium-scale chemical production there. For those of you who is not really aware of the industry’s specifics, I will explain that refers to the production of small volumes of indispensable chemical products – resins, solvents and others – which are critical for the development of microelectronics, pharmaceuticals and many other critical areas.

Catalysts also represent a cross-cutting priority. These are indeed the very foundation of chemistry – substances that determine reaction rates. It is imperative to ensure not only their development, but also subsequent testing, pilot production, and ultimately the broad industrial utilisation and scaling-up of domestic solutions.

To support such endeavours, a dedicated scientific and technological cluster is already being established at the renowned Boreskov Institute of Catalysis in Novosibirsk. This constitutes a significant stride in advancing the entire Siberian scientific agglomeration as one of the key centres for creating future technologies in the field of chemistry."
Vladimir Putin 21 February 2025

"Russians in this audience probably remember and know that we have been talking about ending our dependence on oil and gas exports for quite some time now. This trend is gradually picking up steam, although I have to say that when it comes to oil and gas there are important things we must take into consideration.

Second, the state has the financial capability to uphold its steadfast commitment to ensuring social justice, reducing poverty and inequality."
Vladimir Putin June 16, 2023

"...450,000 households have been connected to gas mains [ed - in 2023] and another million have been technically enabled to do so. This work will be continued."
Vladimir Putin 14 December 2023

"Why do we supply gas to Europe? Gazprom is a reliable partner. It has contractual obligations, and it has always met its contractual obligations and is meeting them now.

The fact that Europe receives less gas than it needs is their problem. Strange as it may seem, they attempted to blame us for this shortfall in deliveries.

This is absolute nonsense, because it was not us but Poland that shut down the Yamal-Europe pipeline, and not us but Ukraine that shut down the second gas pipeline running through its territory.

Neither did we blow up the Nord Stream 1 and part of Nord Stream 2 pipelines. More likely than not, this was done by the Americans, or by someone else at their instigation.

It is not we but Germany that failed to open the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, because at least one pipe in this system is in a working condition.

Germany is reluctant to do that – let them, we couldn’t care less. They are facing price rises, and whole industries are shutting down: glass-making, chemical, metals industry and all related branches are being affected as well. They are confronting real problems. Most likely, the German economy will slip into the red, slightly, but it will. It is their decision, not ours.

Gazprom fulfills all its obligations, including obligations concerning gas transit via the territory of Ukraine.

We also receive money. Of course, Ukraine receives transit fees. We may not be supplying gas to Ukraine directly but in fact, they are consuming our gas. Do you know how Ukraine’s gas network works – and it has since Soviet times? It is linked to the main gas pipeline running to Europe. So, when gas enters the territory of Ukraine, it is immediately distributed across the country. And the gas that Ukraine accumulated over the summer in the underground storage facilities at its Western border goes to Europe as if directly from Gazprom. This is how obligations to consumers are fulfilled.

First of all, Southern Europe. Why would we punish Hungary or Slovakia? We have no such intention; moreover, they pay us like clockwork – and pay decent money. So, we have never done anything for political reasons and are not going to.

As for turning east, I have said it many times, it did not happen because of the escalation around Ukraine. No. It started a long time ago. The Power of Siberia pipeline was not built because of Ukraine. We started building it earlier. Why? Because we can see development trends in the world economy. New centres of economic growth are being created and it is where our primary consumers are emerging. We send our supplies where our oil, gas and coal are bought. I hope all the economies consuming our energy and paying us do well. We are thinking about expanding supplies to China and looking to other countries as our potential customers.

By the way, Japan has not refused our supplies. And it is welcome to take them. We do not mind.

In the Arctic, Novatek is still developing relations with certain European partners in addition to partners from Asia. China is also present there, actively involved and intending to work further. We welcome that. So, our situation is stable and is not based on the current political conditions. In fact, Russia is seriously interested in, and oriented toward the world’s emerging economic centre"
Vladimir Putin 14 December 2023

"Debt Amount: By the end of 2008, Gazprom claimed that Naftogaz, the Ukrainian state gas company, owed approximately $2.195 billion for gas supplied in November and December of that year. There were also allegations of unpaid debts from previous periods, but the immediate focus was on the debt for late 2008.

• Payments and Disputes: Naftogaz made partial payments, including $800 million in mid-December 2008, but disputes over the exact amount continued. Naftogaz recognized a debt of $1 billion to Gazprom and cited financial difficulties due to losses in 2008. However, Gazprom insisted on full payment for gas already supplied and prepayment for further deliveries.
• Legal Actions: Both Gazprom and Naftogaz filed lawsuits with the Stockholm Arbitration Tribunal in January 2009 concerning these debts and related contractual obligations

• Gas Cut-off: On January 1, 2009, after failing to reach an agreement on import and transit prices, Gazprom cut off gas supplies to Ukraine. This action was initially intended to pressure Ukraine into settling the debts but had broader implications.
• Impact on Europe: The dispute escalated when, on January 7, 2009, all Russian gas flows through Ukraine were halted for 13 days, leading to a significant disruption in gas supply to Southeastern Europe and parts of Central and Eastern Europe. This was one of the most severe interruptions since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, affecting countries like Romania, Hungary, Poland, and others dependent on Russian gas transiting through Ukraine.
• Technical and Legal Issues: Ukraine agreed to guarantee the unimpeded transit of gas on the condition that Gazprom would supply technical gas for the pipeline system, which was rejected by Russia. There were also legal battles over the terms of gas transit, with Ukrainian courts declaring some contracts void due to procedural issues.
• Resolution: The crisis was partially resolved by mid-January 2009, with an agreement that included a price of $360 per thousand cubic meters for gas supplied to Ukraine and $1.7 per thousand cubic meters per 100 kilometers for transit through Ukraine. However, the underlying issues of debt and pricing continued to be contentious.
• Long-term Effects: This event highlighted the geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine and underscored Europe's vulnerability to disruptions in Russian gas supplies, which travel through Ukrainian pipelines. It also spurred efforts in Europe to diversify gas supply routes and reduce dependency on Russian gas.

Grok ('X' a.i.), queried 2 January 2024

"As for the gas issue, as you know, we have a long-term contract until 2019, I think. No one questions its legitimacy. We work within the framework of this agreement, but not only it. If we see that our Ukrainian partners have some problems, certain difficulties, Gazprom takes steps in their direction: it provides the necessary loans and pays transit fees in advance to allow Naftogaz of Ukraine to function normally. This is normal conduct between partners and I very much hope that it will continue.

This work is not easy and it’s related to another component as well. It’s related to the fact that Gazprom is actively developing its infrastructure, regardless of the potential of our neighbours to transfer products to the markets of its traditional customers. You know that we have completed the construction of Nord Stream in the Baltic Sea, and we are already delivering 55 billion cubic metres of gas through it.

We already operate the so-called Blue Stream pipeline in the Black Sea to Turkey. Now we are discussing these issues with our Turkish friends...We are currently pumping 16 billion cubic metres, but we are discussing the possibility of larger volumes.

We have begun building the South Stream pipeline in the Black Sea which will deliver another 63 billion cubic metres of natural gas.

I think that our Ukrainian partners have made a very big strategic mistake, a fundamental one.

Together with the Europeans we offered Ukraine to lease to us its gas transportation system, without violating Ukrainian legislation or law, without buying the property, allowing it to remain Ukrainian property. We suggested to let us have the lease and at the same time assume the responsibility for developing and loading Ukraine’s gas transportation system.

Everything that happened in recent years, including the notorious scandal of 2009, has prompted Russia to accelerate implementation of our infrastructure projects. We have extended an oil pipeline to the Pacific Ocean and we will now develop the gas industry in Russia’s east. We will develop production of LNG, that is liquefied natural gas.

And then we will eliminate our dependence on traditional transit countries.

The expediency of the very existence of Ukraine’s gas transportation system is being questioned. You understand that this is a structural problem in the Ukrainian economy.

But we are now ready to engage in dialogue on this topic. It is not easy...I think that if we continue to work as we have been working, namely as the very closest partners and true friends, we will find a compromise solution."
Vladimir Putin 20 December 2012

"I visited our two major construction projects related to natural gas and gas conversion. What I want to say about the restrictions imposed on us: European companies refused to deliver equipment because maybe they believed that we lacked competences. We have restored all our competences, all of them. We only needed to adjust the schedule slightly, by several months.

Major, global-scale facilities will be put into operation in the nearest future. Those who were forced – and our European partners keep saying that they were forced to stop working with us – they are suffering huge losses and loss of profits.

Moreover, some major high-tech companies had to lay off 50 percent and sometimes even 70 percent of their staff.

We are restoring them and are building additional engineering competences, which is very good. Yes, we do need to adjust the deadlines and make do with less, but the advantage is obvious.

Yes, we still have much to work on, especially when it comes to advanced technology, but if the situation was different… The day before yesterday, my colleagues reported that new competences in this area are being built, and it was very important to hear this.
Vladimir Putin 15 September 2023

'...the REPowerEU strategy appears to be the most feasible.The plan suggests cutting Russian natural gas imports to 101.5 bcm from 155 bcm ( 2021) – in theory, by increasing non-Russian gas supply by 63.5 bcm, and reducing gas demand by 38 bcm.

The EU plan to cut two-thirds of its Russian gas imports and replace it [from] elsewhere – by the end of 2022 – is very optimistic...to attract more LNG cargoes, spot prices in Europe should be $2-3/MMBtu higher than the Asian markets. This is leveling now at $35/MMbtu for the rest of 2022 which is more than five times their five-year average.

The bottom line is that it will be impossible for the EU to increase their LNG imports by the crucial 50 bcm milestone. Even if the EU overcomes the technical issues represented by the regasification capacities and the interconnections between the EU countries and Britain, the supply in the global LNG market simply cannot meet the demand.

Although Europe may receive an extra 25 bcm of LNG, it will come attached to a very high price tag, while prices in North America will be largely unaffected. The US is the big winner in this scenario...Europe will have to acknowledge that it will be neither an energy independent or politically independent continent for the foreseeable future.'
'Beggaring Europe: switching cheap Russian gas for expensive American LNG' The Cradle, Daoud Baalbaki 15 June 2022

"More than ever, getting rid of Russian fossil fuels and of fossil fuels in general, is essential. What is at stake is both the need to accelerate the fight against climate change, and, as we can see now, the short-term energy security of the European continent."
Barbara Pompili, EU President 3 March 2022

"Regarding Nord Stream 1, our German partners have agreed that all technical aspects of Nord Stream 1, including the maintenance of gas-pumping turbine units, are subject to British law because – I myself was unaware of this and learned about this from Mr Miller – Gazprom had to sign a contract for the maintenance of these units made by Siemens not with the Siemens main office but with its subsidiary based in the United Kingdom, which slapped sanctions on Gazprom, and agreed to repair the turbines at a Siemens plant in Canada.

What do we have to do with all of that? Canada finally took it but yielded to numerous requests coming from Germany and gave it to Germany, whereas under an agreement with a Siemens subsidiary in the UK, the turbines were to be shipped straight to St Petersburg. Logistics arrangements have changed and the contract has to be revised. The British-based Siemens subsidiary will not even respond to Gazprom’s inquiries.

You can take as many photos with the turbine as you want, but give us the documents, for crying out loud. This is our property. We need to understand the legal status of this property and its technical condition. They give us nothing but chit-chat.

The last turbine is now out of order, so Siemens representatives came to look at it. There is an oil leak, which is an explosion and fire hazard. There is no way for the turbine to remain operational given its current condition. Give us the turbines, and we will turn on Nord Stream 1 overnight. They do not give us anything. They say we are weaponising it. What are they talking about? They themselves messed things up big time and are now not sure what to do about it. They drove themselves into a sanctions dead end.

There is only one way out. In Germany, people are rallying to turn on Nord Stream 2. We are supportive of the demands by German consumers and we are ready to turn it on as early as tomorrow. All we need to do is press the button, but we are not the ones who imposed sanctions on Nord Stream 2."
Vladimir Putin 7 September 2022  [Note: Nineteen days after this speech, Nord Stream 2 was bombed by a western Government - with or without the complicity of other government co-conspirators/proxy non-state actors.]

Gazprom, Russia's gas giant, said last week that since the beginning of this year, the EU had reduced its imports of Russian gas by 48%, while the EU plus the UK combined have reduced Russian gas imports by 49%.

Gazprom's exports to countries outside the CIS have shrunk this year by more than 35% compared to last year's period.

Still, the gas giant is set to rake in 85% higher revenues this year, to around $100 billion, as natural gas prices surged following the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the significant cut to Russian pipeline gas exports to Europe, an analyst told the Financial Times last week.

"Of course, Europe is protecting its interests, especially in the economy, but then again it is doing so half-heartedly. There go the gas pipeline explosions. These are not our pipelines; these are pan-European pipelines. Five European companies are part of Nord Stream 1. So what? Everyone is keeping quiet, as if it is business as usual. They even have the nerve to suggest that Russia blew it up. Russia blew itself up. Have they lost their senses or what? No, they keep doing this.

Gazprom published photos from 2016 showing, I think, a US-made explosive device under the gas pipeline system. They claimed they lost it during exercises. They lost an explosive device so conveniently that it slipped right under the pipeline. I think the [stated] purpose of the device was to destroy underwater mines. Look, here is the photo.

The international media are keeping silent about this; no one is broadcasting it; it all withers on the vine and is nowhere to be seen: neither online, nor on television. This is another case of monopolising the media to promote what they need and to kill everything that stands in their way. It is right there, but no one is saying a word about it.
Vladimir Putin  27 October 2022

"We are ready to supply gas, and we are ready to supply oil – why turn them down? After the explosions on the Nord Stream pipelines we have one pipe left and it is operating. We can pump 27.5 billion cubic metres but they don’t want it. What does this have to do with us? If they don’t want it, so be it."
Vladimir Putin 27 October 2022

“SEFE and Equinor share ambitious goals to accelerate the development of the hydrogen economy. This includes joint business opportunities related to transport and storage of hydrogen for the future. SEFE Group's storage company Astora could be a key building block in this”, Dr Laege continues.

A key element in the potential collaboration on hydrogen is that SEFE could be a long-term off-taker of low-carbon hydrogen from projects that Equinor is planning on the continent and in Norway.

The clear ambition is to supply low-carbon hydrogen to SEFE at industrial scale, starting from 5 TWh per year from 2029 and ramping stepwise up to 40 TWh per year from 2050 towards 2060.

The gas will be delivered to Trading Hub Europe (THE) in Germany, Title Transfer Facility (TTF) in the Netherlands and at the National Balancing Point (NBP) in the UK."
Equinor 19 December 2023

"[the Soviet Union] "calculates that the increased future dependence of the West Europeans on Soviet gas deliveries will make them more vulnerable to Soviet coercion and will become a permanent factor in their decision making on East-West issues...[and] have used the pipeline issue to create and exploit divisions between Western Europe and the United States. In the past, the Soviets have used West European interest in expanding East-West commerce to undercut U.S. sanctions, and they believe successful pipeline deals will reduce European willingness to support future U.S. economic actions against the USSR."
CIA National Intelligence Estimate 'The Soviet Gas Pipeline In Perspective' 1982

"In order to disrupt the Soviet gas supply, its hard-currency earnings from the West, and the internal Russian economy, the pipeline software that was to run the pumps, turbines, and valves was programmed to go haywire, after a decent interval, to reset pump speeds and valve settings to produce pressures far beyond those acceptable to pipeline joints and welds.The result was the most monumental non-nuclear explosion and fire ever seen from space..."
Thomas C. Reed, Air Force secretary (retired) member of the US National Security Council in 'At the Abyss: An Insider's History of the Cold War'.

"If Moscow lands contracts to supply even half of the West European gas-demand gap now foreseen for the 1990s, an additional pipeline...would be required...and dependence on Soviet gas could approach 50% of gas consumption for major West European countries, far in excess of the 30% share that we and some West European governments regard as a critical threshold for political risk"
CIA National Intelligence Estimate 'Soviet Energy Prospects Into The 1990s' 1983

"At the Russian Energy Week yesterday, after consultations with the Turkish Minister of Energy and CEO of Botas, an agreement was reached with Gazprom. I spoke about this publicly: if Turkiye and potential buyers in other countries are interested, we can consider building another gas pipeline and establishing a gas hub in Turkiye for trade with third countries, first of all European countries, of course, but only if they are interested. This hub, built by Russia and Turkiye together, would serve as a platform for both supplies and pricing, as pricing is a critical issue these days. The prices today are exorbitant. We would be able to regulate them properly at a market level without any political implications."
Vladimir Putin 13 October 2022

"We are going to provide the power of Siberia pipeline 2 within four years. We are going to complete this process and we are going to have the completion and reliable supply of gas without any Europe - and when Europe says that you cannot live without us, that's absolutely nonsense! Russia will survive, it's a big territory it's a big country."
Andrey Gurulyov, Member of the Russian Federation State Duma budget expenditure commission 30 September 2022

"Using natural gas from the Russian Federation for decades, the leading European economies clearly had advantages of a global dimension. If they believe they have no use for these advantages, that’s okay with us and does not bother us in any way, because the demand for energy around the world remains high. It is not just about our friends from the People's Republic of China, whose economy is growing fast, as I said and everyone in the world is well aware of, the demand for energy is growing...

...Even the Europeans’ US partners have redirected their LNG tankers to Asian countries...In effect, today it is the biggest economy in the world in purchasing power parity. The Chinese economy is bigger than the American one. Their needs are on the rise, we have stable agreements...Our Chinese friends are tough bargainers. Naturally, they proceed from their national interests in any deal, which is the only way to go. But they are stable and reliable partners and the market is enormous.

But there is more to it. We will also engage in liquefying gas and selling LNG all over the world. As you see, I have already cited an example of the first Arctic LNG-1 tanker ... Everybody is buying it. They will buy it, it will be profitable for them. So we have no problems at all. If European countries want to give up on that, losing their competitive advantages, this is up to them. Let them do it."
Vladimir Putin 7 September 2022

Russia is clearly going to be the major supplier of the cheap and reliable natural gas that China needs. As mentioned, Russia aims to ultimately supply China with 50 billion cubic meters of gas a year through a pipeline in West Siberia (Power of Siberia 2). This pipeline was originally intended to transport natural gas from the Arctic Yamal gas field to Europe. But the pipeline will now be redirected East to China. Sales of gas shipped through Power of Siberia 2 will fully replace the now defunct Russia-Germany Nordstream 1 pipeline. Nordstream 1 carried a third of the Russian gas supplied to the EU. All that will ultimately be exported East. All that remains is a pipeline going through Ukraine, and a contractual dispute has left that with only one string flowing. Eventually, it is possible that no Russian gas will flow to Europe. But the proposed new 2,600 kilometer long Russia-China Power of Siberia 2 pipeline is going to be a few years coming - Mr. Gurulyov's 4 year timeline seems improbably optimistic.

The pipeline will run through difficult terrain in a severe climatic zone. The proposed pipeline route also transits Mongolia, a country which the US is working very hard to bring under it's influence, with all the consequences that will follow (installation of puppet governments, cancellation of gas projects in favor of US funded 'green energy projects', installation of US bases and Russian-facing missiles under the guise of 'defense cooperation' - the whole sorry package). Pipeline construction is not even planned to start until 2024.

The route through Mongolia has been chosen because it brings transit income to Mongolia, it will be a market - albeit a minor market - for Russian gas, and the very polluting Soviet-era coal plants that currently power the Mongolian capital city could be finally closed down. In addition, the pipeline will be able to connect directly into China's national gas distribution pipeline as it exits Mongolia into Chinese territory. But the pipeline doesn't have to transit Mongolia. The pipeline could travel up to the existing Power of Siberia 1 pipeline, follow its route across Russia to Northern China, and thus avoid the risk posed by the USA engineering a destructive 'Ukraine 2' situation in Mongolia. The disadvantage is that it is a longer route, and also needs a subsidary pipeline in China to carry on into the main Chinese network. Gazprom has not made a final decision, but seems to be leaning heavily in the direction of risking a Mongolia transit.

Russian gas to Moldova
Russia was a major supplier of gas to Moldova in the recent past. Russia remains the majority shareholder in the Moldovan gas distribution system. The Moldovan energy company (which contracts for gas supply) owes Russia USD700 million for gas supplied but not paid for. In 2021 Gazprom wanted to stop supplying gas until debt repayments started, but due to an intervention by President Putin agreement was reached for Moldova to buy and supply a reduced amount (5.7 mcm gas/day) of Russian gas (via the Sudzha gas metering station in Kursk, Russia) to Moldova's breakaway territory of Transdniestria. This is about 40% of Moldova's peak requirements. Transdniestria would use the gas to generate electricity in their gas-powered electricity plant, and the electricity would be exported to Moldova, as it had always been in the past. This plant produces about 80% of Moldova's electricity.

Moldova imports the rest of its gas requirements from 6 western energy companies, in the interests of 'energy security'. These companies buy some of their wholesale supply from ship-borne LNG suppliers via auctions on the Romanian commodities exchange. It is exported from Romania to Moldova via the lasi-Chisinau pipeline. Moldova stores 10% of this natural gas as a peak-demand buffer in underground supplies in Romania and Ukraine. The price from the west is a lot higher than the price the Moldovans had previously negotiated with Russia. Moldova is the poorest country in Europe.

The 2024 pipeline debacle
When the contract for supply of Russian gas through the Ukrainian pipeline ran out in late December of 2024, Ukraine refuse to renew it. Ukraine lost all the transit fees, which is their choice. Gas transit in other Soviet-era gas pipelines to European countries were also blocked by Ukraine. Slovakian President Fico said he regarded Ukraine's actions as an assault on Slovakian sovereignty. The situation was laid out in great detail by Vladimir Putin in late December 2024.

"As for energy supply agreements, we have always stood for such supplies, for depoliticising economic matters. We have never refused to supply energy to Europe, have we? I have said this a thousand times, and I can repeat that it was Poland that stopped energy transits via its territory. That route is operational. Nobody has hit it, there were no explosions, so it can be used. You only need to press the button, and gas will flow through it to Poland. It is the Yamal-Europe pipeline, which runs across Poland. You can turn it on any day, and we will supply our gas.

Another route runs across Ukraine.

We supplied gas via it even despite the war; we paid for the transit, and we continue to pay for it. What is happening there? There are two routes across Ukraine, via Sudzha and Sokhranovka.

Our forces have taken over Sokhranovka, and the route has been operating normally for six months, if not longer. Ukrainian specialists worked at the checkpoint, and nobody harassed them or messed with them. They operated the system in accordance with the established procedure, and everything was fine. But Kiev suddenly decided that it should be shut down, and they have done so, under the pretext that it was controlled by the Russian troops.

Why did not they do so six months ago? It has been operating normally, which means that they have some other reasons. I do not understand what it could be.

Or take Sudzha, where fighting is ongoing. It is essentially controlled by Ukraine, yet we continue to supply 14 million cubic metres a day. Do you see what I mean?

Even though they control Sudzha now, they have announced that they will not renew the transit contract. It was not us who said that the operations will be stopped, they announced they would not renew the contract. Ok, they do not want it – so let it be so.

They are eating from Europe’s hand because Ukraine cannot continue to fight – let alone exist without Europe’s support. But they have decided to punish Europe by terminating the contract on transit of our gas to Europe, where the situation is becoming difficult with gas prices running at about US$500 per 1,000 cubic metres.

At this point in time, I can tell you that there is no transit contract, and it is impossible to sign a new one within three or four days. Meanwhile, prices will continue to grow. We have not provoked this; it is their policy. Do you agree?

What is the problem? They have said that there will be no contract, that they would not extend it. And then they realised this has created a problem for them and panicked.

What does this mean? They have appealed to everyone they could to replace Naftogaz Ukraine as a party to a transit contract with us, so that gas will run to the border under Gazprom’s control and across Ukraine under someone else’s control. They want the relevant structures in Hungary, Slovakia, Türkiye or Azerbaijan to sign a contract for gas transit via Ukraine, and Gazprom would have to deal with its partners once this gas reaches Ukraine’s border with Europe.

The problem is that Gazprom has long-term contracts – some until 2035, others until 2049. And these contracts will have to be renegotiated in order to adapt to this new transit environment. This is an extremely complex procedure, hard-to-solve, insoluble even – this is the first point.

And the second point is this. I am explaining this in such detail to keep everyone informed and avoid subsequent speculations.

Ukraine has shut down one of the transit routes for Russian gas exports to Europe, the pipeline that runs via Sokhranovka. They just closed it, and that was it. We had been operating under a ship-or-pay contract.

They closed it and then sued us demanding payment for gas that did not transit through Ukraine.

When Gazprom asked: “Are you crazy or what? You closed that transit,” they said: “Well, we did, but you have to pay anyway.” Sheer nonsense!

Now they said they would allow a third party to operate gas transits via their territory. At the same time, they refused to withdraw their claim from the Court of Arbitration. If the court rules in Ukraine’s favour, then you and I, and many hundreds, 150 million Russian citizens, will be supplying gas to any European country without getting money for that because the money will go to Ukraine to pay off its claim against Gazprom. Under the court’s decision, this money will be debited directly, as they call it. This is absurd! We cannot do this.

We said we were ready to supply gas even if it would be through Azerbaijan’s SOCAR, or a Turkish company, or a Hungarian or Slovak company, but they needed to withdraw the lawsuit. What kind of nonsense is this? They still said no.

Well, you have made your bed, now lie in it – live without our gas."
Vladimir Putin 26 December 2024

Russia's LNG exports  edited 19 July 2024
The most competitive supplier of natural gas will have a track record of reliability and moderate price. That describes Russia (discounting the effects of the US/NATO proxy war on Russia).

In December 2022 the Russian President pointed out that Russian natural gas is supplied to 'partner countries' at a price ten times lower than European gas users pay. He makes the point that as Russia is a reliable supplier, those countries can develop industries with confidence, including fertiliser industries. So far, this has mainly been pipeline gas. Price and reliability are Russia's competitive advantage. But selling pipeline gas requires a long term commitment from the buying country. For example, it took Russia 10 years to negotiate the contract for natural gas supply via the Power of Siberia pipeline to China.

Until recently, China thought that it would be possible to obtain cheaper natural gas from contracts for LNG loads, as it already relies on LNG for around two thirds of it's natural gas imports. But West's interference in normal gas trade has meant there is now a bottleneck in LNG shipping capacity, as Europe, spurning available pipeline gas, turns to an increased number of LNG shipments. At the same time, China's demand for LNG shipments is bouncing back as it's natural gas imports from LNG shipments returns to more normal levels after a 21% drop in 2022. The US blockade has clearly demonstrated the value of overland pipeline gas that cannot be interfered with (the Nordstream 2 pipeline under the Baltic Sea is not so much a pipeline as a practice target for Nordic country, Poland, UK and USA undersea drones).

Russia seems to be settling on a very flexible and diverse natural gas distribution system - land-based pipelines, pipelines under the Black Sea far from the 'unfriendly' countries, and LNG priced at favorable terms (for friendly countries), targeting both longer term and spot markets. For some years now (expiring in 2029) Russia has had 20 year deal with China to supply it with fixed volumes of pipeline natural gas at terms below the spot market. Russia doesn't exclude supplying 'unfriendly; countries either, except that there be a pre-condition - they will supply at free market prices. Even mention a 'price cap' and it's "no gas for you".

Russia has a plan to be able to produce 110-190 bcm/year of LNG exports by 2025, which would eclipse the USA annual production, pushing the USA into second place. (Surpassing Australia as well, which may have to reduce LNG exports anyway to conserve increasing domestic needs). Russia, with 4 LNG plants in operation, is already the world's fourth largest LNG exporter at about 40 bcm/year of LNG exports. There is likely to be very strong competition in the LNG market, and it is likely to split along the West's 'friendy'/'unfriendly fracture line, which may also become the cheap/expensive line.

Strategically, China could import all of Russia's 2025 LNG export production without blinking. It would still need to import LNG shipments from elsewhere, but could drop LNG imports from 'unfriendly' countries - Australia (44 billion cubic meters a year) and USA (12 billion cubic meters). China is also well aware of the US push into Central Asian oil, gas and uranium producing countries - and the inevitable overthrow of governments and instigation of violent internal divisions the USA always use to gain control.

The US produces (2023) about 124 billion cubic meters of LNG a year - making it the world's largest exporter of LNG (even if some of this is actually Canadian natural gas). In 2014, when the US instigated it's proxy war on Russia the USA essentially had no LNG exports at all.

405 million cubic meters of LNG entered the European gas transmission system by year end 2022. This is a record 110% increase in the 5 year average annual demand. This was even when the Nordstream pipelines were operating and supplying gas to Europe as well. (Ironically, the EU stocked up on Russian gas - imports of Russian LNG surged 41% year on year August 2021/August 2022. Obviously, Europe was preparing to dramatically cut Russian gas purchases. As it turns out, it it wasn't enough.)

By late December 2022 Russian Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandr Novak revealed that the European countries were "constantly asking us to increase supplies” through the remaining undamaged pipelines - the Turkstream (31.5 billion cubic meters a year), Bluestream (16 billion cubic meters a year capacity), and the Urengoy ('brotherhood') pipeline entering Ukraine at the Sudzha metering station (reduced to about 15.7 billion cubic meters a year as at late December 2022 but as at February 19 2023 that had fallen to 14.3 billion cubic meters a year). Clearly, there was European demand for Russian gas in 2022, and Russia - in principle - was happy to provide it under commercial conditions. But global LNG supply is increasing.

In 2023 USA LNG export capacity increased further, and by the end of 2023 the EU (plus the UK) took 67% of USA LNG exports as new LNG terminals and de-gasification terminals were completed. Even more will be completed around 2028 (in the US case they may have to be altered to import gas as the US resource diminishes and the Canadians start exporting LNG themselves when their first liquefaction plant is complete).

"The countries that imported the most U.S. LNG were the Netherlands, France, and the UK, with a combined 35% (4.2 Bcf/d) of all U.S. LNG exports.

LNG imports increased in the Netherlands after the Gate LNG regasification terminal was expanded and two new floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) were commissioned. Germany began importing LNG in 2023 when three new FSRUs were commissioned.

We expect another four terminals (three of which are FSRUs) to come online between 2024 and 2027."
EIA, April Fools Day, 2024

 
Post the 2022 downward blip, Russia has kept it's production of relatively cheap natural gas really quite steady overall. The loss of the European market has been compensated by the shift East, to the market of the 'global majority' in the Asia Pacific. India and China are the two big markets there, and Russia will compete there with Qatar. Unlike Qatar, Russia will, in my opinion, allow their customers in China and India to resell Russian gas. Russia looks for stability of sales at a lower price, rather than trying to maximise profit.

“The buyer wants supply stability, and the seller wants a buyer who is stable and can buy in the long run. But the fundamental problem in Europe, in my opinion, is that governments talk about buying more gas, but they can’t because most European countries don’t have the funds to buy gas. Most LNG purchases are made through private companies. It is the private sector that buys... I think 10-15 year deals are probably the most acceptable for both parties. But for us, the long-term deal is not only in duration, but also in price... If you look at the situation, it will be very difficult for Europe to withstand zero supplies of Russian gas for more than two winters...There will be some LNG coming from the US and other places. We have committed ourselves not to remove anything from Europe and not divert any volumes. But, in the end, this is a small volume compared to the huge volume that comes from Russia.”
Qatari Minister of Energy Saad al-Kaabi 5 October 2022

"The EU is the world’s largest LNG importer. In 2021, the bloc purchased 80 billion cubic meters of LNG. Among the union’s major LNG suppliers are the US (28%), Qatar and Russia (20% each), Nigeria (14%), and Algeria (11%)."
RT 24 July 2022


"The European Commission and member states' efforts to diversify away from Russian fossil fuels saw them last week sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Egypt and Israel for LNG exports from the eastern Mediterranean. We agreed a joint statement with Norway to step up our cooperation to have a deeper long-term energy partnership and will work towards securing additional short-term and long-term gas supplies, addressing high energy prices and cooperating on clean energy technologies. We are also working together with other alternative energy suppliers such as the USA, Qatar and Azerbaijan, to give just some examples."
European Commission Spokesperson CNBC 29 June 2022


[The EU] will pay more on average for its [non-Russian] oil and gas than its peers. Asian countries will buy more Russian oil at discounted prices, LNG imported by Europe from the U.S. will cost more than the price paid by U.S. consumers owing to transport and liquefaction/re-gasification costs."
Christopher Granville, TS Lombard, CNBC 29 June 2022

"A transition to carbon neutrality does not go against Russia’s interests – we have opportunities for developing alternative energy sources, including hydrogen energy and pure hydrogen, and we have serious competitive advantages in this respect.

In part, it is possible to use gas. There are many opportunities, and this does not scare us at all but, on the contrary, creates an impetus for development. Primary gas is the best source of energy as a transitional source of energy. How was it possible not to invest enough money - or prevent investment - in the traditional energy sector without preparing fully for this green energy transition? How could this happen?

This is largely the reason for the current energy crisis. After all, Western politicians just talk to win voters to their side. First, they scare regular people with potential climate changes, then they start exploiting this fear and make unrealistic promises, and then they receive the votes they need, come to power and then say “oops”! What is happening now – a return to coal, a return to fuel oil?"
Vladimir Putin 27 October 2022

'“The reason Proman and Stena Bulk decided to go for methanol-fuelled ships is to be prepared for the transformation we have to undergo on the way to net zero,” says Erik Hånell, CEO of Stena Bulk. “We know that we will be able to use this investment through to 2050 and beyond.” The plan is to blend in increasing amounts of blue and, eventually, green methanol to remain compliant with the IMO trajectory towards zero carbon."
dnv.com 20 April 2023

 "Rosatom's cooperation agreement with France's Air Liquide for a project to build a hydrogen production complex on Sakhalin Island has expired...Rosatom said it ...is now "continuing the implementation of the project independently with the participation of a number of Russian and foreign partners.

Air Liquide...announced on Friday that it intends to exit Russia. The company said it signed a memorandum of understanding with the local management team...to transfer its activities in Russia in the framework of a management buyout. This is subject to Russian regulatory approvals.

Rusatom Overseas, Air Liquide and the Sakhalin regional government signed a memorandum of understanding in the spring of 2021 to study the possibility of building a complex on Sakhalin Island to produce up to 100,000 tonnes of hydrogen per year. The parties completed a feasibility study for the project in February 2022....Rosatom is considering a total of ten pilot projects in the field of hydrogen energy. Rusatom ...is now developing these projects. The company is doing research on large-scale hydrogen transportation and production and working with metal companies."

 “US persons are prohibited from engaging in any transaction – including gold-related transactions – involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation.”
US Treasury 2022

"(a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States to seek to exclude government officials of the Russian Federation, to the maximum extent practicable, from participation in meetings, proceedings, and other activities of the following organizations: (1) Group of 20; (2) Bank for International Settlements; (3) Basel Committee for Banking Standards; (4) Financial Stability Board; (5) International Association of Insurance Supervisors; (6) International Organization of Securities Commissions,"

"In order to ensure, under the current conditions, the state’s technological independence and security based on the full life cycle of production from raw materials to final products, the Russian Federation Government was instructed to develop and implement a set of priority measures to create demand for domestic solid minerals (including rare and rare earth metals, titanium, lithium, manganese, beryllium, tantalum and wolfram) in certain critical sectors of the economy (metallurgy, the defence, chemical and medical industries, and construction).

These measures should, in particular, provide for a consolidated order for specific types of goods (machinery, assemblies, installations and materials) with an increase in the share of Russian solid minerals in the chain of their manufacture; the creation of Russian production capacities and technologies for the processing, mining and exploration of minerals, and the geological study of minerals; the utilisation of waste components of mining and processing activities, ashes and slags; the geological and economic reassessment of recorded state reserves; the assessment of probable mineral resources; and the adjustment of strategic planning documents for the development of the mineral resource base and industries regarding the coordination of goals, activities, indicators and deadlines.

The Russian Federation Government, together with the Federal Assembly chambers, was instructed to work out the issues of stimulating the exploration and mining of strategic and scarce types of raw materials and to make the necessary amendments to the legislation.

The Government, with the participation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Rosatom State Corporation and other interested organisations, was instructed to determine the priorities for the development of the mineral resource base of solid minerals in conjunction with the forecast for scientific and technological development in order to create promising high-tech products and materials for the long term. In addition, the instructions relate to the development and implementation of a federal scientific and technical programme aimed at providing comprehensive support for geological exploration, mining and industrial processing of solid minerals, as well as the accelerated substitution of imported technologies and equipment with Russian equivalents.

The Government was instructed to organise prompt and coordinated support to address these tasks, including using the mechanisms of the Russian Federation Government Coordination Centre."
Instructions following an audit of the implementation of legislation and presidential decisions aimed at developing a promising mineral resource base 28 June 2022

“The nickel alloy market is estimated at around $10 billion and expected to grow by 8–10% over the next five years. That is why we see a great opportunity for Nornickel to enter new high value-added markets and actively promote nickel, the Company’s strategic product.”
Denis Sharypin, Nornickel Head of the Marketing Department 23 August 2022

"“The combination of battery materials production and recycling enables the circular economy by closing the loop,” said Tim Ingle, Vice President Precious Metals Refining, Chemicals & Battery Recycling at BASF. “To drive electrification, we are focused on bringing solutions for high energy density cathode active materials and high-efficiency lithium extraction for battery recycling.”

Nornickel describes the construction of a modern recycling plant as a further step towards becoming “one of the most sustainable nickel refineries in the world”. The Russian company and BASF have been partners for some time and have already announced that they want to further intensify their cooperation.

BASF’s investment in its Finnish plant is part of a multi-stage investment plan worth €400 million that the company announced in mid-2017. The cathode materials business is still a relatively small unit under the BASF umbrella but is one of the Group’s most important innovation projects. From 2012 to 2015, the company made a number of acquisitions and investments to gain access to the cathode market.""

"... a new plan for combining lithium mining projects in Bolivia and Russia will produce a surplus of Russia’s foreseeable requirement for lithium battery production. But not only that.

Allied in technology sharing, investment, trade, and political agreement, the two countries will protect each other in the conservation of the lithium market. If everything goes according to plan, Russia, Bolivia, and the three BRICS states – Argentina, Brazil and China – will dominate the trade in global lithium. They are already discussing the formation of a collective marketing organisation – a lithium OPEC."
John Helmer 'Dances with Bears' 28 September 2023

"...we could think about working together with US companies in this area. For example, back in Soviet times, there were plans to build a new hydroelectric power plant and to create additional aluminium production facilities in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. After all, aluminium is, first of all, about energy, preferably cheap energy. Hydropower is cheap and environmentally friendly.

To reiterate, such plans have been in place since the Soviet times. However, these are capital- and investment-intensive projects. In today's money, according to preliminary estimates, they will cost around 15 billion. We can think about it.

Indeed, the US President’s policy is to deploy production facilities in the United States. But if the US companies come to work in Russia, it will also benefit them greatly, because the companies will turn decent profit, and the corresponding amounts of aluminium will be supplied to their domestic market at absolutely acceptable market prices. There are things to ponder in this area, as well as in our potential joint work on rare and rare-earth metals and other areas, including, for example, energy."
Vladimir Putin 24 February 2025

"There is demand for rare-earth metals across multiple sectors, including microelectronics, energy, building infrastructure for the digital economy, and many other civilian and defence applications. In fact, we are talking about almost all sectors within the new technological framework which defines progress around the world. Of course, we need to keep pace with these developments to successfully compete in global markets and create a solid foundation for placing the Russian economy on track for lasting and steady development.

We launched a national technological leadership project this year with a view to expanding the capabilities within the domestic manufacturing sector by harnessing new materials. Titled New Materials and Chemistry, this national project includes, among other things, initiatives aimed at building a full-cycle rare and rare-earth metals sector, covering all the stages from their extraction and processing to the production of ready-to-use value-added high-technology products. We expect output of these products to increase manifold as part of this national project."
Vladimir Putin 24 February 2025


"Our concern is what we have just discussed during the meeting. Rare and rare-earth metals are crucial resources for modern industries. So far, we have not done enough in this area, and we need to do more. The purpose of the meeting today was to direct administrative resources to developing this sector in the initial phase.

By the way, we would be open to cooperation with our American partners – and when I say “partners” I mean not only administrative and government agencies but also private companies – as long as they show interest in working together.

It is important to emphasise that Russia possesses significantly – I want to stress this – significantly larger resources of this kind than Ukraine. Russia is one of the uncontested leaders when it comes to rare and rare-earth metal reserves. We have deposits in the north, in Murmansk, and in the Caucasus, in Kabardino-Balkaria, as well as in the Far East, in the Irkutsk Region, in Yakutia and Tuva.

Developing these resources requires substantial capital investment. We would be happy to cooperate with any foreign partners, including American companies.

The same is true for the new territories: we are open to foreign partnerships. Our historical territories that have become part of the Russian Federation again also hold certain reserves. We are ready to work there with international partners, including Americans.
Vladimir Putin 24 February 2025

"I will emphasise it once again – Russia has been and remains one of the world’s main food producers and exporters. We supply our agricultural products to 161 countries. Last year, we exported over 43 million tonnes of grain, including 33 million tonnes of wheat. This year, we expect good grain harvests, which will allow us to increase our supplies to the external markets up to 50 million tonnes."
Vladimir Putin, 30 June 2022


"Today, we have managed to ensure food security among most key products such as grain, sugar, vegetable oil, and fish products, to name a few. I would like to separately note the achievements of meat and meat product producers.

In addition to saturating the domestic market, our livestock and poultry producers are exporting their products to more than 110 countries.

Of course, we are aware of what we need to work on, such as fruits, vegetables, milk, and dairy products in general. To reiterate, given our land area and other resources, the industry’s potential is tremendous. To tap it, it is critically important for us to consolidate our positions, achieve tangible progress and the necessary independence in a sensitive area like the seed and breeding fund which is the base of the agro-industrial complex and a basis for increasing the yield of our crops and the productivity of our farms."
Vladimir Putin 21 November 2022

"I would like to inform you that there were not exactly disruptions but certain difficulties on the fuel market. We have stabilised the situation and supplied as much as the Russian Federation needed and the Government asked: I think 60,000 [tonnes] of diesel and gasoline each; and we will stabilise the situation on our common markets. If we have to decrease supplies to foreign markets and increase the internal demand, it is not a problem."
President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko to Vladimir Putin 15 September 2023

"Russia is one of the six largest exporters of vegetable oils, margarine, processed cereals; in the top ten world exporters of sugar and chocolate products, packaged tea (for black tea - in the top five), is the world's largest exporter of yeast, ahead of China [2-4].

Russian producers in the feed market occupy a significant share: the largest share in the export commodity structure is occupied by sunflower and rapeseed cake, sunflower and soybean meal, grain processing residues, beet pulp, according to which Russia is the world's largest exporter, and in terms of export of sunflower cake and oilseed meal. and grain processing residues consistently ranks second in the world."
A. V. Kuchumov 2022

"Together with the State Council Commission on Agriculture, the Government has been instructed to amend the Agriculture and Fishing Development Strategy until 2030 to set forth a growth rate of at least 3 percent for agricultural output; set annual performance indicators for the import substitution of critical agricultural products as well as products used by the agriculture industry and fisheries; state support measures for these sectors, including to promote new export opportunities for finished products and increasing funding for the state programme to rehabilitate and reclaim farm land."
Presidential Instructions following meeting on agricultural industry, fisheries and related sectors’ development April 26, 2022

"In addition, there is also a problem with Russian grain exports. Although the West loudly proclaims that grain is not covered by the sanctions, it coyly remains silent about the sanctions on vessels carrying Russian grain. They are not accepted in European ports and are denied insurance. All logistics and financial chains linked with grain supplies to the world markets are under Western sanctions."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov 1 June 2022

"Western countries, which have artificially created several problems by closing their ports to Russian ships and disrupting supply and financial chains, should seriously think about what is more important to them: to use food security as a media stunt or to overcome the challenge with concrete steps. It's up to them."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov 31 May 2022


"The “Ukrainian deal” is being more of less acted upon even though far less than 10 percent is going to the poorest countries, and the bulk (almost half of it) is going to the EU and about the same amount is going to well-off developing countries. The poorest countries are getting just a sliver of it, although Antonio Guterres promoted his initiative with precisely these countries in mind.

No amount of UN efforts has prompted the EU or the United States to lift barriers to our exports of grain and fertilisers.

Washington and Brussels keep saying that no sanctions on food or fertilisers have been imposed. Indeed, the adopted decisions do not mention “food” or “fertilisers.” There is a provision, though, that bans Russian ships from entering Mediterranean ports, a provision that bans foreign ships from entering Russian ports, and there is also a restriction imposed on our main agricultural bank, Rosselkhozbank, cutting it off from the SWIFT system. There is a problem with freight and insurance.

Antonio Guterres must be credited with highlighting these issues publicly. But things have not budged an inch.

The West continues to insist that food and fertilisers have not been sanctioned...the specific issues that Antonio Guterres proposes addressing (and we strongly support him in that) simply remain on the sidelines.

Just like our free offer of to deliver the fertilisers that are stranded at European ports (about 280,000 tonnes). After this cargo had been arrested at the European ports, the Russian owners of these fertilisers said they wanted to have these fertilisers sent for free to the poorest countries so as not to waste the product which loses its potency over time."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov 23 January 2023

"...I would like to highlight one fact. As a result of non-fulfillment of Russia’s requirements under the grain deal, our transportation costs for exports have increased significantly. So exporters partly shift these costs to grain producers and our crop growers. We can say that the profitability of grain producers in Russia has almost halved over the year."
Minister of Agriculture Dmitry Patrushev, 19 July 2023 

"...volatile weather results from ‘the combination of a high continental weather pattern, with the occasional blocking in the seasonal paths of cyclones’ (ibid., p. 3), producing ‘dry hot east winds’ which blow all the way ‘from Central Asia across the Volga, Northern Caucasus and the Ukraine’ (ibid.). These hot winds from the deserts bring high temperatures and virtually no rainfall, causing serious droughts across the whole chernozem region."
'Persistent farmland imaginaries: celebration of fertile soil and the recurrent ignorance of climate' Oane Visser 2020

"The company is also focusing on foreign trade. In 2021, exports amounted to almost 3 million metric tonnes. Our main goal is to fully bypass international trade mediation and work directly with the importing countries. Egypt is probably our main client. Over two agricultural seasons, we ranked highest among Russian exporters with 1.5 million metric tonnes of wheat.

Moreover, with our partners from friendly countries, we are transitioning to payments in national currencies. For example, we have signed several contracts with our Turkish partners. The latest of these, signed in March, is payable in rubles; the overall total will be about 3 billion rubles."
Dmitry Sergeyev CEO of the United Grain Company 6 July 2022

"At a meeting of the BRICS Ministers of Agriculture held on June 28, the Russian initiative to create a grain trade platform was presented for consideration by the partners. It is designed to help ensure food security of the BRICS countries and, more broadly, the developing countries."
Maria Zakaharova 21 August 2024

#1 On 22nd July 2022 Russia came to an agreement with the United Nations to allow facilitate grain ships leaving Ukraine via the Black Sea. Turkiye and the UN will inspect the empty ships (with Russian and presumably Ukrainian observers) as they enter the Black sea in order to confirm they are not carrying weapons to Ukraine.
The price for this agreement is that the sanctions on Russian grains must be removed. This refers to sanctions on insurance, port access, and shipping companies, as well as on specific sanctioned products such as parts for agricultural machinery involved in grain production.

"Officially, the sanctions on our fertilisers and food have been lifted, but in reality certain restrictions remain. This is a complicated and insidious situation. It appears that there are no direct sanctions affecting our products, and yet there are restrictions concerning logistics, chartering ships, money transfers and insurance. Many of these restrictions persist, although credit should be given to the efforts of the UN Secretary-General and the United Nations in general: when it comes to chartering ships, many restrictions are being lifted despite the sanctions imposed on the ports we ship cargo from. Nevertheless, this sector is being released from the restrictions and the vessels can already call at our ports. So, the situation is improving.

There are still certain restrictions that prevent us from ensuring that the interests of all consumers in global food markets are being served. As a result, prices on the global markets are going up. But we hope that the remaining restrictions will be lifted. This is the first point.

Second. You may remember my meetings with our friends in Africa and African organisations. As I said in my speech, we promised to do everything we could to serve the interests of the developing countries – specifically, by ensuring supplies to their markets, including supplies of Ukrainian grain. When we discussed this, that was the understanding.

What we see is more audacious deceit. And they did not deceive us: they deceived the international community, their partners in Africa and other countries that desperately needed food. It is a con job, impudence and disgraceful conduct towards the partners who were supposed to benefit from the deal. It was a hoax, see?"
Vladimir Putin 7 September 2022



"Of the 87 ships that left Ukrainian ports carrying grain, 32 remained in Turkiye, and I believe that was a fair part of the deal because Turkiye was the country that arranged this entire process and therefore is certainly entitled to this. Three went to South Africa, three to Israel, seven to Egypt, 30 to the European Union, and only two ships headed for the poorest countries under UN food programmes – for Yemen and Djibouti. They carried 60,000 tonnes of grain, or a mere 3 percent.

I would like to ask the Foreign Ministry to take this into account when interacting with our partners, including the UN. True, we cannot influence this process, cannot direct how much food goes where, but nevertheless, we consider it right to increase supplies to the poorest countries...

In May-August of this year, the Russian Federation supplied 6.6 million tonnes of grain to world markets, including wheat, barley and corn, of which as much as 6.3 million tonnes went to Asia, Africa and Latin America. Overall, by the end of the year, we will supply 30 million tonnes of grain and are ready to increase our exports to 50 million tonnes or more, because thank God, this year's harvest is good."
Vladimir Putin 9 September 2022


"The Russian portion of this package, which is formalised by a special Memorandum between the UN and our country, is not being implemented at all. Our Türkish friends and the initiator of the entire package, UN Secretary-General Guterres, are sending calls and requests to Western countries, but in vain.
The obstacles to financing, logistical clearance, transport and the insurance of these exported Russian products remain unchanged and are even getting tougher.

Our Western colleagues do not tire of repeating, despite the facts well known to them, that neither fertilisers nor grains are on the sanctions lists. Indeed, neither fertilisers, nor grains are recorded in the sanctions column.

But everything else that my friend has just said is in evidence: disconnection from the SWIFT system, the inability to insure and reinsure cargo under normal conditions, the inability for Russian ships to enter Mediterranean ports and for foreign ships to enter Russian ports, and much more.

President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen and others who are “eager” to solve developing countries’ food problems can repeat like a machine that food and fertilisers are not under sanctions. This will mean only one thing: they are telling us that Russia must keep its food and fertilisers, sit on them but not take them anywhere, even though they are not under sanctions.

Having once extended this deal for a second term (120 days) and not seeing any signs that anyone can really solve these problems, and after tiring of appealing to the conscience of those on whom it depends, we were forced to escalate matters somewhat. We offered to extend the deal only for 60 days. We proceeded from the assumption that if there were no further progress in removing obstacles to the export of Russian fertilisers and grains, we would reflect on whether we need this deal now.

“Corridors of solidarity” are being implemented concurrently with the Black Sea Initiative which the European Union came up with and which imply exporting Ukrainian grain and many other goods to Europe and the EU over land. These goods enjoy the most favourable terms and conditions. In fact, they are discriminating against similar products made in the European countries. Major protests started there because the European market is flooded with cheap Ukrainian grain. All of that has degenerated into commercial exports to Western countries. If their countries are overflowing with cheap Ukrainian grain, which makes selling grain produced by the European countries an unprofitable proposition, they could give it to poor and developing countries. As we were told, this is the rationale for UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres’ “package” initiative. As a result, less than 3 percent of Ukrainian grain is going to the poorest countries with the bulk of it ending up in the EU.

If they choose not to take the approach that Antonio Guterres proposed and persistently promoted in an honest manner, let them continue to ship products from Ukraine by land, rail, or river. The West has the appropriate logistics in place and they are fully operational.

Russia will work, if it has to, outside the Black Sea Initiative. We can already work with Türkiye and Qatar.
The presidents discussed these plans. Russian exports to the needy countries will not be affected. I can promise you that."
Sergey Lavrov 7 April 2023

Looks like Türkiye acts as middleman for some shipments, but the noise from the west about the starving south can't receive grain due to Russia has been shown to be a lie. Very little of it was ever intended for those most in need. Russia will block the Black Sea as an export corridor for grain until the west unlocks its ban on SWIFT connection, insurance "and more". In the meantime, Russian grain will flow to re-export hubs in Turkiye and Qatar.

"The Rosselkhozbank, the main bank that services our agricultural exports, has been expelled from the SWIFT system, and there are no plans to bring it back in. Instead, we are offered a one-off alternative, where three American banks, as the Secretary-General requested, replace SWIFT and help Rosselkhozbank service export operations.

A few months have elapsed, and one of the banks kindly consented to finance one operation. But when we are told that we should continue our efforts on the basis of this principle, that’s not much to go on.

If you want to systemically resolve the issue of food shortages on the global market, then there is the need to bring our bank into the fold of the SWIFT system.

...Yes, we can see that the Secretary-General and his colleagues have been making efforts, but there have been practically no results, unless we are to view as results the glimmer of hope that, instead of normal provision of necessary products to global markets, each time there will be a need to make efforts manually and plead with American and European ports, banks and other structures, insurance companies and request that they be magnanimous.

That’s not the deal we reached on July 22 of last year when we supported the Secretary-General’s initiative which, as he has reiterated, is a major package that has many components....

...There are still problems with insurance, and yesterday I was told by the Secretary-General that the rates dropped significantly after his contacts with Lloyd’s of London, but this is all focused on maintaining and preserving control over everything that is happening, to prevent our fertiliser and grain from freely reaching markets and on the basis of market mechanisms, to prevent them from entering certain countries. All this, of course, complicates the work of the World Food Programme which has been helping the poorest countries...No, I do not suspect that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was disingenuous when he proposed the deal. I believe his intentions were sincere. I know Mr Guterres quite well and can state this with confidence."
Sergey Lavrov, 25 April 2023


There’s no measurable progress under the Russia-UN Memorandum. There are obvious issues with the declared humanitarian component of the deal where Ukrainian grain is being exported through this sea corridor mostly to high and above-average income countries, including “well-stocked” European markets.

Countries that need it most have received hardly anything, 722,000 tonnes (or 2.5 percent) of the total amount of 30 million tonnes that had been moved from Ukrainian ports over nine months.

The export of Russian products, even donations of fertilisers to the neediest countries, continues to be blocked by various aspects of the illegal and unilateral sanctions.

Western capitals and UN platforms continue to talk much and in loud voices about global food security and the threat of hunger. These tasks are explicitly, and in detail, laid out in the Russia-UN Memorandum, which is being systematically sabotaged by Washington, Brussels and London. The Black Sea Initiative doesn’t say a word about it.

There is no progress either in resuming ammonia shipments mentioned in both Istanbul documents. In particular, this concerns the Togliatti-Odessa ammonia pipeline, which the UN Secretary-General focused on during his visit to Kiev on March 8, and a separate initiative, which, like the Russia-UN Memorandum, remains only on paper.

Given the circumstances, we are compelled to issue a reminder primarily to the United States, the EU and Great Britain, which care so much about food security in word only, about the need to actually remove Russian fertiliser and foods from the list of unilateral sanctions.

There are five systemically important issues that must be resolved as part of implementing the Russia-UN Memorandum and which have seen no progress whatsoever so far, namely, reconnecting Rosselkhozbank to the SWIFT system;
supplying spare parts;
unblocking transport logistics and insurance;
reestablishing the Togliatti-Odessa ammonia pipeline, and
unfreezing the Russian companies’ assets.

There can be no talk of expanding the Black Sea Initiative in principle without these requirements first being met. The agreement will be terminated after July 17.
Press release on renewing the Black Sea Initiative 18 May 2023


"...we are in contact with United Nations officials. I repeat ...: they are sincerely striving to ensure that Western countries fulfil the commitments they have undertaken, but they are not succeeding so far. And they say to us..'extend the deal again'.

We can do this in a different way: we will extend the deal exactly at the moment when the promises made to us are fulfilled.

Question: The deal expires on July 18. How long are we prepared to wait for them to start making good?

Vladimir Putin: As long as it takes to fulfil the promises made to us.
Vladimir Putin 13 July 2023

"The Memorandum of Understanding between the Russian Federation and the Secretariat of the United Nations on promoting Russian food products and fertiliser to the world markets - Russian grain and fertiliser exports make up a much larger share of the world markets than Ukrainian - will remain in effect through July 2025.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and his representatives maintain contacts with us at all times and are trying to help. However, they are not trying to have sanctions imposed on us lifted, and are nor demanding that the West - if it genuinely wants to advance the interests of developing countries, the Global Majority, primarily Africa - cancel its discriminatory food security policies.

UN Secretary-General Guterres chose another path and started looking for loopholes in the Western sanctions without demanding to lift them altogether. Moreover, in fact, he did so while complying with these sanctions and acting upon them, which is absolutely unacceptable for any UN official, even more so for the Secretary-General.

The UN Charter says that no member of the UN Secretariat, including the Secretary-General and his deputies, can receive directives from any government.

If the UN Secretary-General is looking for loopholes with regard to sanctions, thus recognising that they exist, he is, in fact, acting upon the decisions that are made in the capitals of UN member states, which is something he cannot do.

That is why our negotiators in Riyadh, who were assigned for this mission by President Putin, reminded their US counterparts of this incident and said that, given Ukraine’s track record and the Black Sea incident in question, we would like to leave ambiguity out of whatever agreement we may reach this time.

We also noted that when the Ukrainian part of the initiative expired in 2023, and we withdrew from it, President of Türkiye Recep Tayyip Erdogan tried to renew it on two or three occasions. A year ago, he asked for our support to fast-track the renewal of the initiative without conducting physical inspections of empty ships after grain and fertiliser get unloaded. We were willing to meet them halfway even then.

Then, at the last moment, President Erdogan said Vladimir. Zelensky still wanted to reach an agreement on not targeting nuclear infrastructure facilities, even though Zelensky was the only one to attack Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant. Considering the fact that this proposal came from Kiev, we agreed to it without recurring to any special verification mechanisms this time again.

In other words, we met all President Erdogan’s requests, including the one that Zelensky slipped to him at the last moment for purposes that remain unknown. We agreed to it. Later, President Erdogan called President Putin and said Zelensky had a change of heart.

Every time a ceasefire was declared, Ukraine agreed to it solely because it found itself in desperate straits on the battlefield at that particular historical moment. A few weeks or a couple of months into the ceasefire, they grossly violated it. This is how things were throughout time the Minsk Accords were in effect.

That is why this time we need clear, concrete, verifiable, and workable guarantees and mechanisms.

Our position is straightforward, and I have just outlined it in broad strokes. We cannot take this individual’s word for it.

We want the grain and fertiliser market to be predictable, so that no one tries to make us leave it. It’s not only because we want/wanted to generate a legitimate revenue in fair competition, but also because we are concerned about food security in Africa and other countries in the Global South and Global East that are impacted by the West’s unscrupulous competition tricks...

As I mentioned earlier, we will need clear-cut guarantees. Given the disappointing experiences of our past agreements with Kiev, the guarantees can only exist in the form of a directive coming from Washington to Zelensky and his team to do so and so and not otherwise."
Sergey Lavrov 25 March 2025

"...Secretary General Guterres was trying, Secretary General of UNCTAD, Rebecca Greenspan was trying, but the UN position, the UN Secretariat position, was very, you know, tricky. Basically, they were saying, "We cannot touch sanctions."...they recognized unilateral sanctions as legitimate, so they told us, "We will try to find a way bypassing sanctions so that we don't violate them." And they have been trying to do this for almost three years and to no avail...

"In the meantime, Ukrainians, ...send a lot on dumping prices to the European Union. The European Union is not happy. And instead of doing something about this situation for the sake of their citizens Brussels people threatened to stop importing any grain from Russia...

So this time, when President Trump suggested another Black Sea deal, President Putin said, "Yeah, we are ready, but we need to draw lessons from the past, and let's make sure - before we launch it, let's resolve the things on freight, insurance, calling on the ports." The Americans took this, and they are considering - they didn't come back to us after this.
Sergey Lavrov 12 April 2025

In a nutshell, the west continues to try to hold Russia's grain exports to ransom. The UN appears to be largely either impotent or secretly unwilling, in my opinion. The west is devious and untrustworthy. Its assurances on anything are worthless. Once the west has completely and fully fulfilled the other part of the deal Russia will extend the arrangement straight away. Nothing more to be said.

"Let me add that restrictions on the operations of Russian metal and steel manufacturers are a clear act of unfair competition (I repeat, we can see this in other industries as well), they are attempts by Western countries to restrain Russian businesses as leaders in world metallurgy and redistribute the markets, of course, in their favour.

I would like to stress once again that Russia will always be a reliable and responsible supplier of metallurgical products to foreign customers and partners regardless of any current political troubles. We will also be reliable partners to those who are looking for beneficial, predictable business cooperation, but we will not act against our own best interests in relations with those who have adopted an openly unfriendly stance towards us. This applies not only to the metal market, but also to our other exports..."
Vladimir Putin, 1 August 2022

"Our foreign customers and partners have always seen and continue to see cooperation with Russian metallurgists as predictable and mutually beneficial.

...the Western states have imposed illegal restrictions on Russian companies. This includes a ban on shipping ready-made products, as well as the purchase of certain components for manufacturing - rolled metal products, steel sheets, rods, etc."
Vladimir Putin April 20, 2022

"Today, we have a high demand for cold-resistant steels in Russia, which are used in the construction of Arctic zone ships and vessels. The demand for AB2-PK steel exceeds 700 tons a year. The production of this steel at Motovilikha will allow for the domestic shipbuilding industry to be less dependent on imported counterparts. Entering this market is part of a program to get the enterprise out of bankruptcy proceedings and create a center for the manufacturing of innovative steels demanded by leading sectors of the economy. In the medium term, we expect to take 50% of the shipbuilding steel market and enter into industrial cooperation with shipbuilding companies..."
Semyon Yakubov, the RT-Capital CEO 6 October 2021


"Arc steels have not yet come into use among shipbuilders, but in future they are expected to replace many shipbuilding steels. The first commercial order in Russia for arc-steel was drawn up with the help of Rosatom. In the upper part of the icebreaker Leader hull, it will be used in the areas with the lowest operating temperatures. Arc-steels are one of the results of work in the field of precision, that is, precise, technologies for creating new materials.

Until recently, any changes in steel quality indicators were solved mainly by alloying - the introduction of various chemical elements into iron. But an increase in the content of alloying elements significantly increases the cost and complicates the production process. By fine tuning the technological process, it is now possible to obtain steels with different properties from the same workpiece. For example, a change in temperature at the end of hot deformation can affect the strength and ductility of the metal.

The of KM Prometey Central Research Institute, part of the Kurchatov Institute Research Centre, is Russia’s largest interdisciplinary materials science centre, specialising in advanced materials and technologies for industries where products, structures and equipment are operated in extreme conditions. These are shipbuilding, nuclear, thermal and hydropower, gas and oil refining industries, mechanical engineering and production of military equipment. In particular, within the framework of the design and manufacture of a new generation of VVER-type reactor plants, work is underway to create an austenitic, radiation-resistant steel for elements of in-vessel structures."
Nuclear Engineering International 6 October 2020

"...these unfriendly steps towards Russian metallurgists are only serving momentary political interests...they have suspended ties that took years to establish and that hinged on reasonable parameters like business reputation, mutual interest and economic efficiency.

There was no place for these key concepts, which are crucial to businesses, in the political games of Europe’s bureaucrats...there is no reason to believe that there will be any essential change in our partners' behaviour. We have to take this into account when implementing our metallurgy development strategy at the corporate and state levels.

...Businesses are already rebuilding their logistics and production chains and looking for new suppliers and clients in order to keep enterprises working and protect the interests of their staff.

...we should not forget about the long-term development of the metallurgy industry, the implementation of its future plans, and seek not only to ensure the steady operation of the entire metallurgical complex and to maintain production volumes but to boost production capacity and expand the range of goods produced domestically.

I suggest that we discuss a potential industry development model with the business representatives here, based on the current state of affairs and thinking far ahead.

I want to stress the importance of domestic demand, which needs to be supported and stimulated – primarily, by expanding the scope of residential, infrastructure, commercial and industrial construction, and by producing more metal-based goods.

I want to repeat that long-term projects and programmes are necessary to support the demand for Russian metals. The impact of such projects and programmes will serve the entire economy. It will benefit the Russian regions and their residents."

Obviously, new clients have to be found from amongst the 'friendly' countries. But Russia may be a price taker. Metallurgical exports fell about 20% year-on-year in Q2 2022, steel prices are down due to muted global demand, sheet metal product demand in particular is down, domestic consumption is down. New markets are being found, but at a discount to export markets lost in Europe. For all these reasons, Evraz, Russia's largest steel goods manufacturer, is struggling.

But as Evraz makes 28% of all Russian railway wheels and 97% of Russian train-tracks, it has to be regarded as a strategic company. The more so that it has partnered with Gazprom to mutually explore pipeline transport of hydrogen gas, a process that requires 'high spec' steel and special welding techniques. The hydrogen gas is derived from re-formatted natural gas, and the CO₂ waste stream from this process can be captured and stored deep underground in depleted natural gas reservoirs. Gazprom has a great deal of experience in carbon capture and storage. Hydrogen gas can only be transported in licensed gas pipelines, and who can produce and certify the specialised steel pipes has a strategic and economic advantage.  Russia generally takes majority control of strategically important companies by one means or another, so I expect Evraz to be added to the Russian government strategic asset list.

Currently Evraz North America is privately owned, with one major shareholder (who recently resigned as chairman), and the company is listed on the UK stock exchange. The UK has blocked trading in it's shares, and sanctioned the companies products and financial transactions (including dividends and repatriated profits from the US subsidiary). Clearly, Evraz Russia is ripe for de-listing and takeover by the Russian government - who will also inherit it's debt. The majority shareholders loss on assets of Evraz North America can be dragged for decades through the WTO and various courts.

Tin

As at 2022 tinplate (used in food canning, aerosoal spray cans etc) in Russia is in short supply due to 'sanctions'. Russia consumes around 266,000 tonnes of tinplate. In 2021 Russia imported 127,000 tonnes, almost half of Russia's domestic consumption. About 56,000 tonnes was imported from Europe (Germany, Slovakia, the Netherlands), about 33,000 tonnes from China, and 28,000 tonnes from Kazakhstan.

The remaining half of domestic needs came from MMK, the only Russian tinplate manufacturer, which in 2021 produced 169,000 tonnes. (MMK's small production excess was exported to Ukraine and the Central Eurasian Commonwealth of Independent States countries.)

In 2014 Belarus funded an enterprise (the Miory tinning mill) to make extra-thin tinplate (used in tin cans) to export to Europe, but it has fallen into bankruptcy. In August 2022 Belarus took on the company's debts, and nationalised it. As tin plate to Europe is now 'sanctioned', Belarus has turned east.

Belarus will supply it's own annual needs of about 30,000+ tonnes (previously all imported) first, and then supply tinplate to Russia, Kazakhstan, Africa and Central Asia instead of Europe. The plant is aiming to produce around 9,000 tonnes a month (108 tonnes a year) by November 2022, all of which will be sold to Russia, and reach the full capacity of 150,000 tonnes of tin plate annually by 2024. Belarus will probably have to wait for Russia builds another tin plating plant to increase Russian domestic capacity before it will be able to export beyond Russia.

In 2023 Rusolovo, a minerals mining company (gold, tin, tungsten, copper) operating in Eastern Russia, announced plans to build a tin processing plant to move 'up the value chain' from simply being an tin ore-concentrate producer to being a tin-plate manufacturer.

Rusolovo (a subsidiary of Seligdar Holding) has one of the largest tin deposits in the world.Seligdar produced 2,900 tonnes of tin concentrate, and hopes to be able to increase that to about 15,000 tonnes of concentrate by about 2030.

Russia's domestic market for Steel

International conditions for expansion of steel use are currently unfavorable to Russia. Domestic demand is key to the survival of the Russian steel industry. As always, the government has to pay for this by subsidising or funding new projects. As it happens, infrastructure development is the Russian governments main priority. Russia is the largest country in the world, with vast distances between towns. The eastern and northern regions are poorly served with road and rail. New industries in the near arctic are hampered by poor roading, poor communication, poor water, poor housing, and poor public facility infrastructure. A large amount of investment money is needed, and not all of it can be supplied by the rather carefully controlled Russian budget. Foreign investment is needed.

The government brought in a regime of tax breaks for foreign investors - an important source of capital. Westerners will no longer be able to invest in Russia. But other countries, such as China, the UAE, Saudi Arabia will.

A combination of private domestic and foreign investment. plus Russian government investment, funded from budget surplus and cheap loans from the Central bank might make up for losses of longstanding steel contracts with the west.

Russian steel products are likely to be sold at discounted prices, if that is what it takes to keep the industry alive. Better prices also help cement in long term relationships.

And Russia plans ahead for the long term. It has a plan for an economy that improves its citizen lives (the number one priority of government, according to President Putin). That plan involves a lot of coordination of private and public investment, and involves a lot of logistics planning, a lot of big projects. And that involves a lot of steel.

Coal Industry
Russia is the third-largest coal exporter, after Indonesia and Australia. Russia provides about 18% of world coal exports by volume. In 2021 almost 23% of Russia's coal went to China (over 45 million tonnes a year), but by the end of 2022 China was taking 40% of Russia's coal exports. About 22% goes to the EU (almost 39  million tonnes in 2021). In 2021 South Korea and Japan took roughly 17 million tonnes each in 2021. By the end of 2022 South Korea's imports of Russia coal had dropped to 13%, but India took 20% of Russia's exports.

The Elga coal deposit in Yakutia has reserves of about 2.2 billion tonnes. It is not only the largest coal deposit in Russia, it is also one of the largest coking coal deposits in the world. Coking coal is 'metallurgical coal', that is, it is the carbon source used in making carbon steel.

On April 8th 2022 the EU prohibited import of Russian coal, with the restriction due to come into effect on 10 August 2022. This is surprising given the EU's dependence on Russian coal imports. Maybe the eu will import it (at great expense) from Australia. On 21 July 2022 the UK also prohibited the import of Russian coal as from 10 August 2022.

Both China and India are increasing imports of Russian coal to take advantage of the reduced price. Turkiye has started importing larger than usual quantities of coal from Russia (1.8 million tonnes in June 2022, which, if annualised, is a bit over 21 million tonnes per year) If fact, Russian overall coal sales have increased slightly since the start of the Ukraine operation.

Titanium

Russia is the world's 4th largest titanium exporter, valued at USD$471 million in 2020. Main export markets 2 years ago (millions) were Germany $148, US $132, China ~$29, UK ~$27, Ukraine $22.5. It's imports in 2020 were modest (millions), Kazakhstan ~$19, China ~$9, Estonia $10.7, US ~$7, Ukraine ~ $6.

Most of the world titanium dioxide concentrate produced in the world is for the bright white pigment used in white paint and in plastics. Only a small percentage of the mined ore is used to smelt into titanium metal, an energy intensive and technically complex process. Russia has 3 large titanium mines. Russia's largest titanium mine is Ruchar, with 3 billion tonnes of ore containing 15% titanium. The Pudozhsky mine in the Republic of Karelia.has 516.7 million tonnes of ore (8.1% titanium). This mine also contains resources of about 1 million oz of platinum and 2.4 million oz of gold.The Yugo-Vostochnaya Gremyakha mine in Murmansk Oblast.has 585.3 million tonnes of titanium ore grading out at 8.51% titanium.

Russia is not listed in the US Geological Survey data on tonnage of titanium production. The UGS gives its data in weight of titanium dioxide, rather than ore containing a certain percentage of titanium oxide. Perhaps Russia's reserves are simply being air-brushed out. Even so, Russia is the worlds third largest producer of 'smelted' (sintered) titanium 'sponge', 33,000 metric tonnes per year. China is the worlds largest producer (110, 000 tonnes). Japan is second largest titanium sponge producer (50,000 tonnes).

The Russian State owns the world's largest titanium producing company VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation, which is a subsidiary of state-owned Rostec corporation. While titanium is a not uncommon mineral, it is, of course, a strategic mineral, important in aircraft and spacecraft manufacture. Russia produces about a third of global titanium used in the aviation sector. In addition to titanium, VSMPO-AVISMA produces aluminum, magnesium and steel alloys, and exports products to 50 countries around the world. VSMPO-AVISMA has facilities in USA, Ukraine, Germany, England, and Switzerland. Boeing USA has invested heavily in  a joint 50:50 venture with VSMPO-AVISMA created in 2007, 'Ural Boeing Manufacturing'. The joint venture makes titanium components for Boeing finishing in Boeings USA factories, as well as parts for Airbus. VSMPO-AVISMA also supplies manufactured parts for Embraer, Safran, and Rolls-Royce.

"In an interview with Design News, Boeing’s chief materials maven Alan Miller brushed off concerns about relying on a Russian source for titanium. Miller said that Boeing has done a lot of collaborative work in developing new high-strength alloys in collaboration with Russian titanium experts.

Boeing’s alliance with the Russian titanium industry has been growing since the early 1990s. As of 2008, VSMPO-Avisma will become Boeing’s biggest titanium supplier, moving ahead of US companies TIMET and RMI Titanium. As part of the deal, Boeing is helping develop Russia’s aircraft production capabilities."
Design News July 30 2007

A second production line was launched in 2018. This highly automated 82 million dollar expansion, located in a special economic zone called 'Titanium Valley' machines parts for Boeings new civilian airliners. The 'titanium valley' special economic zone has special tax concessions and customs fast-tracking for investing companies, as well as guaranteed infrastructure.

Ironically, while Russia has been the reliable partner, the US has not. The Boeing officials should have been more concerned with their own politicians de-stabilising a mutually beneficial partnership with their 'sanctions'.

"During last November’s Dubai Airshow, the company and Boeing announced an extension of Ural Boeing Manufacturing joint-venture “for years to come.” A Memorandum of Understanding covered the supply of titanium of current and future commercial aircraft programs, including the 737/MAX, 767, 777/777X, and 787, making the Russian company the largest supplier of titanium parts to Boeing. The two companies would also work together on new alloys and technologies. In a press statement at the time, Boeing Commercial Airplanes CEO Stan Deal described VSMPO-AVISMA as “a reliable and valuable partner to Boeing for almost 25 years.”"
Airinsight.com February 28, 2022

The 'sanctions' means that Boeing 'suspended' buying titanium from Russia. Boeing had been diversifying titanium sources in recent years, and while it still relies on Russia for 30% of its overall titanium metal supply, Boeing believes it can increase its supplies from domestic US suppliers, China, Japan and Kazakhstan in sufficient quantity to replace Russia. The US produces about 100,000 tonnes of titanium dioxide a year, but has to import a further 1,000,000 tonnes of TiO₂ a year, mostly for use as a white pigment. It is discretely quiet about the machined parts it obtains from its Ural Boeing Manufacturing joint venture. According to various industry internet resources these parts are still delivered by roundabout means that comply with the letter, but not the 'spirit' of the so-called 'sanctions'. It seems there is a certain amount of 'don't ask, don't tell' going on.

Boeing has suspended the supply of aircraft parts to Russian airlines, and suspended training in Russia. The EU banned the sale and trade in aircraft and aircraft parts in February 2022, but didn't ban imports of titanium, as such.

"Airbus has said it relies on Russia for half its titanium needs, while state-backed VSMPO-AVISMA provided a third of Boeing's needs under a deal renewed last November [2021]. Last month, Boeing said it had suspended buying Russian titanium. Aerospace officials say Airbus is partly concerned about the reliance on Russia at suppliers like France's Safran, which uses titanium to make jet engine parts and landing gear.Safran said in February it had reserves for several months and depended on Russia for less than half its needs."
Reuters 12 April 2022

Will the American and European aircraft part manufacturing trade return? That is really 'will the American and EU 'sanctions' end'? If you 'tool up' to make specific parts for specific airline models, as Boeing did, it is a big financial blow if you have to walk a way from it. Well the French seem to have got cold feet, because on 22 July 2022 the EU abandoned the proposal to impose sanctions on VSMPO-AVISMA - mainly due to objections from France.

If Boeing walks away from their Russian investment, they might lose the Russian specialist titanium metallurgic expertise as well as the modern bespoke production capacity. Or they may pay a huge salary for the experts to emigrate to America. America's loss may end up as Russia's gain.

USA mainly imports titanium ore from South Africa (27%) Madagascar (18%), Australia (15%) and Mozambique (15%). China, which has the worlds largest titanium ore reserves (230 million metric tonnes titanium dioxide) - is also a massive titanium ore consumer. Not only did it consume all the ore it produced, China also imported 3.6 million tonnes of titanium mineral concentrate in 2021, mainly from Mozambique (32%), Australia (14%), Vietnam (13%), and Kenya (9%) (U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2022). While China exported titanium-based manufactured products it remains a nett importer of its own resource. No doubt it met its own needs for titanium metal first. Australia has the worlds second largest titanium ore reserves, with 160 million metric tonnes of titanium dioxide. India has the worlds third largest titanium ore resource, at 85 million metric tonnes, but has relatively little mine production.

Nuclear Industry

Uranium ore is relatively widely distributed around the world. As at mid 2022 Kazakhstan, Russia's neighbour, produces 45% of world supply, the next largest producers being Australia (12.1%), Namibia (12%), and Canada (10%). Russia has produced relatively small amounts of it's ore resource.

Long term, the largest economically recoverable resource is in Australia (28% of global resources), Kazakhstan (15%), Canada (9%), Russia (8%), and Namibia (7%). China's ore resources amount to 4%, and USA's are only 1% of global resources.

State-owned Rostatom mined a total of 7,000 tonnes of uranium in 2022. 4,500 tonnes of that were mined by a Rostatom subsidiary, the Uranium One Group. This company is involved in international uranium mining.

The Uranium One Group is nearly ready to start pilot mining and processing of the large Nyota uranium deposit in Tanzania, which has resource base of about 152 million tonnes of ore. The eventual production target is set at 3,000 tonnes of yellowcake a year. The Uranium One Group is exploring uranium deposits in Namibia, and once characterised, it hopes to start mining in 2029. The exploration and development license is for 25 years.

The USA produces only about 5% of the mined uranium oxide ore (not yet enriched) it need domestically.  US power plants bought 23,400 tonnes of uranium oxide equivalent 2023, 95% from foreign sources, including Russia. Although Russia provides USA with only 12% of its unenriched Uranium needs (as expressed as weight of uranium oxide), it is still significant. Canada is USA's dominant supplier (as at 2023), at 25%, and Kazakhstan is not far behind at 21%.

Currently, nuclear power only supplies 10% of world electricity. Around 60% of global electricity generation comes from burning fossil fuels, and this has not changed much over the years. Demand for electricity is rising and will accelerate as the world warms. The lead time to build new nuclear power plants is fairly large. Older reactors are having their design life extended with repairs and modification. At the same time, new reactors 'go live'. Demand for both power plants and their 'consumables' will increase. There is no chance that nett carbon emissions by 2050 can be achieved without a massive build-out of nuclear power. (Nett zero simply cements in all global warming consequences until that equilibrium state, whether that is tomorrow or 2050. It does nothing to remove and thus reduce the dangerous level of fossil-fuel derived carbon dioxide buildup in the atmosphere).

While the US and Europe may want to 'onshore' and 'friendshore' all the elements of nuclear power plant construction and fueling in order to reduce dependency on Russia (in particular) for fuel assemblies, in reality the nuclear power industry is a complex and internationalised industry with many co-dependencies.

"When the commercial nuclear industry began in the 1960s, there were clear boundaries between the industries of the East and West. Today, the nuclear industry is characterized by international commerce. A reactor under construction in Asia today may have components supplied from South Korea, Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Russia, and other countries. Similarly, uranium from Australia or Namibia may end up in a reactor in the UAE, having been converted in France, enriched in the Netherlands, deconverted in the UK and fabricated in South Korea."
World Nuclear Org, April 2023

"The Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant has been mentioned, the flagship of our cooperation. The Americans tried to disrupt it by putting 69 Russian ships set aside to deliver the equipment for the project on their sanctions list. It’s a modern version of colonialism. Our Bangladeshi friends and we have found other ships that are delivering the equipment on schedule. The ceremony of bringing in the first batch of nuclear fuel has been scheduled for October. Everything is proceeding according to plan.

The equipment-carrying Russian ships were also banned from entering the port of Chittagong...Today, the country, which rendered fraternal assistance, cannot send its ships for civilian purposes because the Americans have introduced sanctions. This is no democracy. Rather this is nothing short of diktat."
Sergey Lavrov 8 September 2023

'Russia imposes temporary restrictions on the export of enriched uranium. A resolution to this effect has been signed.

It concerns the export of enriched uranium to the United States or under foreign trade agreements concluded with persons registered in the US jurisdiction. The exception is deliveries under one-time licenses issued by the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control.

The decision was taken by presidential instruction in response to the US restriction on the imports of Russian uranium products for 2024–2027 and a ban on such imports from 2028. Vladimir Putin instructed the Government to analyse the possibility of restricting supplies of strategic raw materials to foreign markets at a meeting with the Government in September.'
Resolution No. 1544 of November 14, 2024

Russia’s Rosatom exports fuel for Brazilian nuclear power plants and radioisotopes for medical purposes. Rosatom is also interested in participating in the construction of new power units in Brazil, including low-capacity nuclear power plants, both land and floating plants, because it has unique and extensive experience, and technologies that are not available elsewhere in the world.
Russia Press Statement 16 February 2022

Russia is also involved in building nuclear power plants in Turkiye, Egypt, and Brazil, which will inevitably use Russia fuel.

"Neither the pandemic, nor foreign policy pressures were able to obstruct the construction of the world’s largest nuclear power plant. The credit for this, which cannot be overestimated, is to be given to the leaders of our two countries, who sometimes had to intervene personally to help us resolve certain issues.

Construction on the first unit is nearing completion, with the equipment being assembled at the site. At the second unit, the reactor vessel has been installed. At the third unit, the melt localisation device is being installed. In the fourth unit, reactor housing foundation reinforcement is nearing completion, and work continues on a key piece of equipment for the plant, the low-speed turbines...

...The construction of Turkiye’s first nuclear power plant has become a true joint project: over 400 Turkish companies are taking part in it, and we can say that Turkiye now has its own nuclear industry cluster. The experience we have gained through cooperation will allow us to tap the potential of this industry at other sites, including international sites...

...Training and education for the power plant’s personnel is underway. About 300 people have already received educations in the professions needed by the nuclear power industry at Russian universities, undergone hands-on training and joined the project team. Education quotas will also be allocated for the coming academic years"
General Director of the Rosatom Atomic Energy State Corporation Alexei Likhachev 27 April 2023

Russia generally offers a 'full package' of building, repairs, and fueling, with operation eventually being left in the hands of locals. Russian-built nuclear power plants use Russian manufactured fuel assemblies, and it is technically challenging (but not impossible) for other enrichment and fuel rod manufacturers to manufacture compatible fuel assemblies. In other words, Russian-built nuclear power plants provide a ready market for Russian manufactured fuel assemblies for the design life of the power plant.

Russia is interested in building a nuclear power plant  for Kazakhstan, its neighbour. It is a 'package deal,' in line with Russia's 'value proposition' in this area.

"If Kazakhstan decides to go ahead with its nuclear power projects, then, of course, as any customer, it can choose the most suitable technological solution and financial arrangements.

I think it is no coincidence that the Russian company Rosatom is the world’s largest company of its kind, including in terms of the number of nuclear power plants it is building around the world. Why is that? It is because, as I have said many times, we are not just building power plants. As a rule, we create an industry in a country that initiates this type of activity. We train personnel, supply the necessary materials, take away spent fuel and so on. We help advance science in the nuclear sphere.

Of course, the President of Kazakhstan and our Kazakhstani colleagues and friends are familiar with this type of activity. They are not starting from scratch. To reiterate, we even have enterprises – they have uranium mining enterprises – which are operating in this area. They are well aware of what they want and what they are willing to pay for it, and what they want to get. That is why we are having a very professional dialogue. Should our partners, in this case, Kazakhstan, need or prefer to use some solutions, including technological solutions from third countries, and involve their specialists into the collaborative effort, this is also possible, and Rosatom has experiences of cooperating with foreign partners. We discussed this yesterday as well.

The customer always has the final say. But I think our cooperation with Kazakhstan in this area is quite possible. It would be really strange for Kazakhstan, which has the world’s largest uranium deposits, not to use uranium, but only mine and export it. The leadership of Kazakhstan is operating on this premise

In addition to everything else, it is probably no coincidence that Rosatom is currently operating in 20 countries, I think, or building 20 facilities abroad. It owns advanced technologies and the world’s best safety standards, which fact is confirmed by the International Atomic Energy Organisation, the IAEA."
Vladimir Putin, 28 November, 2024

The El Dabaar nuclear power plant project will be Egypt’s first nuclear power plant. It has a design-lifetime of 60 years. When completed in 2028, the plant will have 4 reactors capable of producing 4,800 megawatts. The Russian government is meeting  85% of the $30 billion cost, but as a loan to the Egyptian government. The remainder is met by the Egyptian government and investors. Rosatom will supply the nuclear fuel for its design lifetime, and maintain and repair the reactors for ten years. In 2021 Russia started training Egyptian specialists to take over the work in full after the ten year period. In January 2024 the concrete for the base of the 4th reactor was poured. Over 90 Egyptian contractors partner with the Russian project team, delivering on 285 contracts worth $1.2 billion. However, political games sometimes puts an end to existing Russian commercial interests.

"We would like to highlight that the initiative from Fennovoima's management to terminate the EPC contract - which is such a major step for the project - was taken without any detailed consultation with the project's shareholders, the largest of which is RAOS Voima (an 100% subsidiary of Rosatom), with a 34% stake.

"The reasons behind this decision are completely inexplicable to us. The project has been progressing and we had established a good working relationship with our client."

Rosatom added: "We reserve the right to defend our interests in accordance with applicable contracts and laws."
World Nuclear News 3 May 2022

In late March 2022 Finland reneged on it's fixed-price contract with Rosatom to build a 1,200 megawatt nuclear power plant. No doubt Rosatom will sue them. The EU attempted to convince Hungary to in effect renege on its agreement with Russia to provide additional nuclear power capacity, but Hungary, as it is not as stupid as the rest of the EU countries, refused.

Rosatom has an agreement with Uzbekistan to construct two VVER-1200 nuclear reactors to be operating by about 2028. Russia has financed most of the 13 billion cost, and will train Uzbek technicians in all aspects of nuclear technology deployment. The reactors will meet about 15% of Uzbekistans expanding energy needs. (Currently, most Uzbek electricity is generated from natural gas. It also imports electricity from neighbouring countries.) Uzbekistan has the world's 7th largest uranium resources, mostly exported to USA, China, and South Korea.

On the April 12 2023 the US imposed 'sanctions' on Rusatom Overseas (a division of Rosatom) and Evgeny Pakermanov, its president. Rusatom Overseas is responsible for the development of small (under 300 MW) nuclear power plants suitable for supplying electricity to remote areas. These power plants can also be used to supply heat from the reactor coolers, a form of co-generation. Rusatom also deals in export of various nuclear tech products used in science, medical, and industrial sectors. So far, only Rwanda has signed up for a small nuclear power plant, whose principle use will be research and technical extension. Rwanda's growing population demands more power, and it's hydro sources have proven unreliable due to periods of poor recharge. No doubt more small plants will follow. Once proven for safety and reliability, there is likely to be a good market in Africa.

Nuclear fuel exports edited 10 February 2024
An important element of Russia's nuclear industry is supplying nuclear fuel for power plants. This is in the form of low-enriched and purified uranium manufactured into uranium oxide fuel pellets. These pellets are assembled into banks of rods of appropriate size and shape for a given nuclear power plant reactor design. The design and building of enrichment facilities is complex and expensive, so relatively few countries have them. Russia is an important supplier of these assemblies (including to Ukraine - which it continues to supply in spite of the conflict). Recent Russian-built nuclear power plants have long design lives - the power plant being built in Turkiye, for example, has a design life of 100 years. That's a long-term customer. Given the rapidly emerging global warming crisis, nuclear power is certain to become much more important. Ironically, rising temperatures means accelerated demands for electricity for cooling.

"A single uranium pellet, slightly larger than a pencil eraser, contains the same energy as a ton of coal, 3 barrels of oil, or 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas. Each uranium fuel pellet provides up to five years of heat for power generation. And because uranium is one of the world’s most abundant metals, it can provide fuel for the world’s commercial nuclear plants for generations to come."
Hitachi Ltd 'Nuclear Power Basics'

In April 2023, US, Canada, and Europe announced plans to gradually stop buying Russian nuclear fuel - which will be awkward for the approximately 18 nuclear power plants in Europe that use Russian fuel assemblies.

Russia is the fourth largest supplier of uranium to USA by volume (Canada is first). But Russia's further processing of the uranium means it is the largest exporter of uranium to USA by value.The US introduced a bill to Congress in December 2023 which aimed to ban imports of uranium from Russia (with an escape clause to allow import if the US really, really, needed it). The bill stalled in the Senate, but the industry was so alarmed it doubled the import of Russian fuel in the month of December 2023, resulting in a record $1.2 billion of total imports for the 2023 year.

In December 2023 the US applied 'sanctions' to enriched uranium ('high-assay low enriched' uranium, about 20% enrichment, HALEU) it imports from Russia. The 1 billion dollar trade is unlikely to be interrupted in reality, as the so-called 'sanctions' are for practical purposes suspended as long as the US needs Russian enriched uranium. The US produces only 27% of its enriched uranium needs domestically (it has only 1 enrichment facility, Urenco, and its output is inadequate to meet increasing US demand), but currently about a quarter of its enriched uranium needs come from Russia - and this is unlikely to change quickly.

As at June 2025, the USA is attempting a mafia-like blackmail of Iran to acquire an interest in Iran's ability to produce high-assay low enriched uranium (20% enrichment).

In November 2024 Russia restricted exports of enriched uranium exports to the USA except for "one time" shipments allowed under a Russian government license.

'Russia imposes temporary restrictions on the export of enriched uranium. A resolution to this effect has been signed.

It concerns the export of enriched uranium to the United States or under foreign trade agreements concluded with persons registered in the US jurisdiction. The exception is deliveries under one-time licenses issued by the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control.

The decision was taken by presidential instruction in response to the US restriction on the imports of Russian uranium products for 2024–2027 and a ban on such imports from 2028. Vladimir Putin instructed the Government to analyse the possibility of restricting supplies of strategic raw materials to foreign markets at a meeting with the Government in September.'
Resolution No. 1544 of November 14, 2024

In general, in the USA specifically, nuclear power plants that are able to vary power output will become increasingly important as 'baseload' power available when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow. The USA is installing ever larger solar capacity, but the US nuclear power production is already supplying a steady 20% of total power as high energy efficiency, with fuel a relatively minor cost. While USA currently has very good supplies of natural gas, these will deplete as the 'fast burning' shale 'oil' deposits deplete. Then the US must turn back to coal for 'always on' baseload power. The only solution is integrating with Canada's hydro and nuclear excess power, plus massive battery build out. All this takes time. Russia will remain a major supplier of enriched fuel for the next decade, at least.  By then, Russia will have developed other markets, markets that use geographically dispersed interconnnected electric grids to load balance. And, with China, it will be producing small standalone, full service nuclear power plants in Africa and other continents.

Nuclear electric power generation - long term prospects
In the long run, the future must be nuclear. All countries in the world will need to cooperate. The USA and it's vassals are impeding coherent science-based practical steps to stop extracting and burning fossilised carbon. They play stupid political games in a climate emergency. For their immediate personal self interest, and to hell with the rest of us - and our children and grandchildren. The combined west are not just sociopathic fools, they are extremely dangerous fools.

Defense industry [Edited 15 March 2024]

"A lot has been done over 2021. Our consolidated revenue grew by almost 10 percent and amounted to 2.06 trillion rubles. We have crossed the important psychological milestone of two trillion. We have been trying to achieve this for a long time and, finally, last year we surpassed this barrier, this milestone.

Our consolidated net profit increased by almost 47 percent and constituted 163.5 billion rubles. EBITDA increased by 18 percent to 335 billion. The total market value of our assets is a new indicator that we introduced last year. It is 980.5 billion rubles, which is 50 percent higher than in 2020; this means that the value of our assets is constantly growing.

The share of civilian products in the consolidated net profit amounted to 45.5 percent."
Sergey Chemezov, CEO of Rostec State Corporation 18 May 2022


"Over the previous years – I mean really years: not a year and a half or two years related to the special military operation, but years – we have been building up the structure of the defence industry accordingly. The enterprise, the corporation where we are, was established in March 2003, and in 2002 decisions were made to rebuild the defence industry as a whole. The executive order to this effect was signed in 2002. That is when we launched this effort. At that time there were six enterprises of this kind, but today there are 56
Vladimir Putin 25 May 2024


"...the forum’s agenda includes grand-scale presentations of the most advanced and largely unique and unrivalled achievements of Russia’s defence manufacturers and its leading, internationally acclaimed corporations. This includes over 240 export versions of weapons, as well as all kinds of military and specialised hardware.

Let me emphasise that many of Russia’s advanced, unique and innovative solutions have already proven their worth on the battlefield. Moreover, we improve their basic performance all the time. Designers, engineers, scientists and teams working at defence manufacturing plants have been proactive in their efforts to take into account the combat experience we acquired during the special military operation."
Vladimir Putin, Address on the opening of the Army 2024 International Military-Technical Forum 12 August 2024

The Russian Government-owned Rostec Corporation ('State Corporation for Assistance to Development, Production and Export of Advanced Technology Industrial Product') is the largest player in the Russian defense industry. The Russian government has long wanted to see civilian product spin-offs from defense technology, as has happened in the west. The President set Rostec a target of a civilian market segment of "50 percent by 2030". As Sergey Chemezov noted, they have already achieved 45.5%, and, 'thanks' to both covid-19 and western sanctions, it is almost certain this target will be met much earlier than expected.

"As for the state defence order (SDO), this is the main goal for our companies because they are mostly in the defence industry. In fact, they receive about half of the entire SDO. Last year, in 2022, the SDO was fulfilled by 99.5 percent. This figure is high. We have increased production of all types of military products that are being used in the special military operation on a very high scale today.

Speaking about this operation, our products account for 90 percent of all military hardware involved in it.

This is primarily barrel and rocket artillery, light and heavy armour, transport helicopters, combat aviation, heavy fire systems, small arms and all types of ammunition.

The following hardware has demonstrated brilliant performance in the current combat operations: BMP-3, BTR MDM, T-90 Proryv (Breakthrough) tanks, Iskander missile systems, Kinzhal (Dagger) hypersonic air-launched missile systems, Ka-52, Mi-28, Su-57, Su-35, and Cube and Lancet drones. Today, we are producing everything the Defence Ministry needs. We are meeting the demand in full."
Sergei Chemezov, CEO of Rostec State Corporation 7 August 2023

By mid 2023, it had become obvious that government spending on Russia's burgeoning military-industrial sector was a major factor in sustaining the viability of the Russian manufacturing sector.

"At least one third of our industrial growth is ensured by the increase in consumer demand. About two thirds – let’s put it straight – are produced by the defence industry and related sectors and these sectors also work with a double and triple effect."
Vladimir Putin, 3 August 2023  

The western sanctions have created a strong imperative for Russia to innovate across many industries. The Russian military has been a major source of innovation since the earliest times, and the pace seems to have accelerated under external pressure. While the most advanced hypersonic missiles are unlikely to be exported, the various track-decision-launch integrated layered defense systems are exported. In 2024 the Russian President commented the Pantsir defense system was selling like 'hot cakes'. The systems are already competitively priced, fairly efficient, and are likely to become a popular option for countries needing a defensive posture as a major part of homeland security.

The updating of the strategic defense system, including the massive liquid fueled Sarmat ICBM, has allowed Russia to design and build an unbeatable nuclear strike missile. The Sarmat can reach into space, has a range that allows attack from any direction (including via the South Pole), has an ability to accelerate, and a degree of maneuverability.

The West's proxy war on Russia has meant Russia has had to re-invigorate it's defense production of missiles, and even at early January 2023 missiles factories are working 3 shifts, around the clock.

"...we produce annually three times more of the air defence missiles that you manufacture than the United States does.

Overall, our defence industry manufactures about the same number of air defence missiles of different designations as all of the world’s defence manufacturers put together.

Our production is comparable with global production. So we have something to rely on. All this is bound to fill us with confidence that victory will be ours."
Vladimir Putin January 18 2023

Advances in satellite-based electronic intelligence for military operational purposes, including sophisticated integrated optical and radar technology, is not usually 'for sale'. But again, there are spin-offs in commercial space vehicle satellite deliveries, as well as other civilian spinoffs.

Sergey Chemezov outlined some of the accomplishments of Rostec in the military sphere in 2021 and projects for the future -
- Rostec will use its experience in the special military operation in Ukraine to develop 'pocket-sized' drones that are all but invisible. They will be used for fire control and real-time military intelligence, especially useful in urban warfare.
- Total redesign and equipment refit of the 1980's Tu-160M missile carrier, fitted with Rostec's new NK-32 engine ("We have actually created a totally new aircraft. It looks like the previous model on the outside, but in fact, everything is new")
- The Checkmate fifth generation light tactical 'stealth' fighter with a modified Su-57 engine. Flight testing is due in 2023 and production is due in 2027. (This aircraft was designed mostly for export)
-  Okhotnik UCAV drone with an innovative flat jet nozzle that makes it less visible to radar with production due in 2023.
- the first Russian-made diesel gas-turbine engine (the M55R), to be used in Russian frigates

Rostec received massive stimulus from the special military operation in Ukraine, and has increased production of military materiels, working extra shifts, weekends, and public holidays.

Rostecs Russian Helicopters produced 134 helicopters in 2021, and more than doubled that number to 296 military helicopters in 2022. The lancet and cube drones are produced by Rostec subsidiary Kalashnikov, and are proving very effective - in fact helping change the nature of defensive land-based warfare. Rostec is involved in making many high tech war products:

"In addition, Rostec companies make anti-drone systems. For example, Ruselectronics manufactures anti-drone guns known as the Pishchal-Pro and Serp (Sickle) systems for countering UAVs. The KRET holding [Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies] produces radioelectronic warfare equipment.

Our holding company High Precision Systems is working on an airspace monitoring system. We have developed small radars capable of identifying small and slow targets – these are drones, to be clear, because today’s radars cannot always identify these targets since they fly low whereas radars are designed to intercept high-flying targets like aircraft or missiles."
Sergei Chemezov, CEO of Rostec State Corporation 7 August 2023

The irony is that the US incited, organised and provisioned the Ukrainian proxy war on Russia, but as important, blocked all Russian efforts at a diplomatic solution to NATO's threat to Russia, which is the real problem. The USA refused to negotiate on Russia's very reasonable mutual security treaty, leaving Russia with the very very clear message that Ukraine would try to take back Crimea and the Donbass with a well-prepared and determined military attack.

As a result, the USA forced Russia to re-arm, modernise, and increase production capacity dramatically.

"Artillery weapons, armoured vehicles, tanks, combat aircraft, firearms, drones, munitions, and other equipment are regularly being sent to the Army. Honestly, if we had not conducted a deep modernisation of our enterprises before 2022, we would not have been able to increase production several-fold, as we did last year and this year.

I can give you a good example: we boosted the production of munitions for firearms and MLRS by 50 times."
Sergei Chemezov, CEO of Rostec State Corporation 28 December 2024

"I asked to convene this meeting today with almost a single purpose in mind which is to thank you and the developers of the Oreshnik system, as well as all the research, production, and labour teams involved in creating it for the results of your work.

This includes the entire cooperative network which encompasses designers, researchers, engineers, and workers who developed hypersonic technologies, analysed the ballistics, and mastered the production of cutting-edge materials, control systems, microelectronics, and much more.

Your achievements and the short time it took you to develop this new system inspire pride and admiration. They convincingly show that the domestic school of rocket engineering possesses tremendous potential and is capable of addressing the most complex tasks to ensure Russia’s security and sovereignty."
Vladimir Putin 22 November 2024

"Vladimir Putin: We need to ensure maximum return on every ruble invested in defence industry..during the Soviet era, no one was concerned about these expenditures, unfortunately, efficiency was not a priority. Defence spending accounted for about 13% of GDP of the country – the Soviet Union.

... I will cite the Stockholm Institute: last year our defence spending was 4%, and this year it is 6.8%, meaning we have grown by 2.8 percentage points. This is a noticeable increase, but not critical at all.

In the Soviet Union, it was 13%, whereas we are currently at 6.8%.

It should be noted that defence spending accelerates the economy, making it more dynamic.

However, there are limitations to consider, as we understand. The age-old question remains: what is more beneficial – guns or butter? We have this in mind.

Although, as I mentioned, our modern defence industry is good in that it not only indirectly affects civilian industry sectors but also uses innovations necessary for defence industry to produce civilian goods. This is an extremely important thing.

Of course, our spending is incomparable. How much do they have in the United States? ...Nearly 900 – 860 or 870 billion [US dollars]. They are absolutely incomparable to our spending.

Dmitry Kiselev: It seems to me that they are embezzling because they have no hypersonic [weapons], nothing… What is it?

Vladimir Putin: I'll explain what it is. The issue is that significant portions of their funds are allocated towards maintenance, not just salaries, but also towards maintaining bases worldwide.

It's difficult to track where all the money goes, as it seems to disappear into a black hole. This is where the majority of the embezzlement occurs.

Although significant amounts of money which are difficult to evaluate are also spent on producing means of destruction, weapons in general.

If we calculate the cost of their well-known anti-missile defence system and one of our main means to overcome missile defence systems – the ”Avangard“ intercontinental missile with a glide vehicle of intercontinental range, the values are simply incomparable.

Essentially, we nullified all their efforts and contributions to the missile defence system. This is the appropriate course of action.

Additionally, it is imperative that our Armed Forces' economy aligns with current demands."
Vladimir Putin 13 March 2024 

By June 2024 Vladimir Putin noted that most defense industries were filling the defense procurement orders "on time, to the standard, and even ahead of schedule for a number of items".

Most in demand were advanced iterations of high tech weapons that have proved very important in achieving 'an edge' over the opposition's products. These include high-precision munitions (such as glide bombs), unmanned aerial and ground systems such as drones of all kinds, electronic warfare systems, and unjammable and secure communications systems.

"I would like to emphasise that we must always be one step ahead. We have to always be one step ahead of the adversary, and then victory will be guaranteed. You know this. Your specialists and you personally always remain in touch with our men fighting on the line of contact without sparing themselves to defend Russia’s interests. Whenever we manage to get an edge, no matter how slim it is, this increases our effectiveness manyfold.

We must also be effective when using assets supplied by the so-called grassroots defence manufacturing sector. We must enable it to develop and expand its manufacturing operations, and introduce a fast-track procedure for supplying its most effective solutions to the army...

...we have substantially increased our output ...over the period of the special military operation. From 2021 to 2023, the growth was more than 22 times for missile and artillery weapons, 15 times for electronic warfare and reconnaissance equipment, 14 times for ammunition and munitions, seven times for vehicles, six times for body armour equipment, four times for aviation equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles, and almost 3.5 times for tanks and armoured vehicles."
Vladimir Putin 25 May 2024

Electricity sector  First edited 26 October 2024. Last edited 28 March 2025.

Russia is a nett energy exporter.  Russia's Electricity exports in year end January 2022 were $179M and imports were $2.11M, a nett export value of $177M. Russia exports electricity mainly to Finland ($116M, 9 terawatt-hours nett), about 10% of demand, China ($22.2M), and Lithuania ($20.1M), with smaller amounts to Kazakhstan and Latvia. In May 2022 Finland refused to pay Russia for the electricity Russia had already supplied, Fingrid saying "Due to these restrictions payments for sold Russian electricity can no longer be made." As a result, Russia cut off power to Finland until Finland had paid its debt.

In July 2024 and executive order was signed to formalise a treaty with Belarus to create a united electricity market of the Russia-Belarus 'Union State'. Belarus does not have a tradeable electricity market, and setting the system will take at least until 2025. The Russian-built Ostrovets nuclear power plant produces more power than Belarus needs, and the excess is sold to the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and Poland. In July 2024 those states announced that they will cut themselves off from Belarus grid by February 2025 in favor of the joining the EU electricity system. The EU is supplying these states with about €1.2bn to cover much of the cost of synchronising with the EU electricity grid. Belarus will have to export to Russia, which is also a nett exporter of electricity.

Russia's Zaporozhye nuclear power plant has a total installed capacity of 5,700 megawatts (MW), with six VVER-1000 reactors, each generating 950 MW, making it the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. The reactors are currently shutdown due to Ukrainian attacks on the plant. In early 2025 various American officials, in a thuggish display of cupidity, mooted the idea that the USA - the instigator and party to the conflict in Ukraine - should become part owner of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant.

"The transfer of the ZNPP itself or control over it to Ukraine or any other country is impossible.

All employees of the station are citizens of the Russian Federation, one cannot play with their lives, especially given the atrocities that the Ukrainians have committed and continue to commit in our country.

Joint operation of the ZNPP with any state is not acceptable either. There are no such precedents in the world practice. In this case, for example, it would be impossible to properly ensure nuclear and physical nuclear safety and settle issues of civil liability for nuclear damage.

An important aspect is that close cooperation between Ukraine and NATO countries' intelligence agencies, which have an impressive sabotage potential, makes even a temporary admission of these states to the ZNPP impossible."
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation statement 25 March 2025

The Russian grid is run by the national grid company Rosseti, which is 88% owned by the Russian government. Rosseti is one of the largest grid companies in the world. So far the west's trade restrictions haven't had a major impact. The Rosseti CEO says that "large-scale" transition to domestic equipment and "solutions"  has been accelerated by the restrictions, implying it was already under way. He says Rosseti is "giving a lot of our time to it" and has "accomplished quite a lot".

Russia historically has produced most electricity from thermal generation (coal and gas). About 68% is from thermal sources, but many of the turbines and associated equipment is old and long overdue for upgrading. Upgrading had already started prior to the recent sanctions, but mostly affected small capacity turbines. It was cheaper and easier to buy foreign medium and large turbines (mainly Siemans and GE). Maintenance was done solely by overseas specialists, and parts of course came from overseas. The Russian government now has to build it's own large turbines, fund Russian scientists and technologists, find solutions to technically challenging parts of turbine manufacture, solve technical problems, and subsidise the local manufacturers in perpetuity. All of which it can do over time. A step in this direction was purchase in 2022 of Siemens Energy's 65% stake in Siemens Gas Turbine Technology and Siemens Energy Transformers LLC by Inter RAO Russia.

By 2024 Russia reached the point where it built and installed its first domestically-produced high powered turbine, the GTD-110.

"Russian power plant builder Technopromexport (TPE), a division of state corporation Rostec, has launched the third generating unit at the Udarnaya Thermal Power Plant, which was built using Russia's first domestic heavy duty gas turbine, the GTD-110M...The 560 MW Udarnaya TPP in Krasnodar Territory was built under the competitive capacity offtake mechanism for new power generation at a cost of 60 billion rubles.

The investment will be recovered with payments from industrial electricity customers. But the mechanism also includes capacity delivery obligations...The total capacity delivered to the market now amounts to 456 MW."
Interfax, 10 October 2024

Russia has long had the ability to make power station transformers, including for nuclear reactors and renewable energy. Russia in fact exports such products. Overall, the sanctions will accelerate the already-planned modernisation of Russia's thermal power generation.

As at 2021 electricity supply reached 860 billion kilowatt-hours, 56 billion higher than 2020. Time will tell if this growth rate (7%) in supply will continue. According to Kommersant, there were forecasts that electricity exports over summer 2022 might reach 1.35 billion kWh. The massive 2022 drought in China restricted China's electricity supply at a time when airconditioning was desperately need, and as a result, Russia's exports to China jumped by 35%. The value of electricity sold to China in the first 6 months of 2022 reached $125 million - more than fives times greater than for the whole of the previous year. Rosseti's revenue increased to 1.1 trillion rubles in 2021, 100 billion rubles more than 2020. In February 2024 Inter RAO reported that operating earnings were flat, at about 2022 levels, due to loss of electricity sales to the west (28 billion rubles worth).Even so, Inter RAO carries no debt, and plans to invest 160 billion rubles in 2024.

A major focus of investment of some of this revenue is to 'de-bottleneck' distribution of electricity from the Murmansk Region (which has a surplus from it's hydro, nuclear, and wind power plants). And in 2024 the chairman of INter RAO noted they were "experiencing strong growth". In order to accomodate the increasing demand Inter RAO plans to build new generation in both Siberia and in southern Russia.

"Providing the Eastern Operating Domain with electricity, our largest project at the moment, is our top priority, no doubt about it."
Andrei Ryumin, CEO Rosseti 12 July 2022

The grid has also been extended to mining companies in isolated areas of Russia's autonomous regions and one of the republics in Russia's East - as well as port facilities in the Far East.

Aviation sector - civilian aircraft

Russia, the largest country in the world, is the world's 11th largest aviation market. Quite apart from the EU banning all business jets, and passenger and cargo airliners in the EU airspace, the EU has banned the sale, trading and leasing of aircraft to Russia.

Aircraft parts, vital to repairs and airworthiness certification, are also banned. In response, the Russian government will provide it's own airworthiness certifications, has placed the leased overseas owned aircraft on it's own domestic register, has allowed the terms of existing leases to be unilaterally changed, and has allowed the Russian government to "add exceptions" to foreign aircraft ownership rights. The law was put in place days before about $10 billion of leased aircraft were to be re-possessed. Russia leases about 515 foreign aircraft.

"Not all of Russia's 35 airlines, about 15 of which represent 95% of the country's traffic, are relishing what experts have already warned could spiral into aviation's largest default.
"We hope to avoid registering our planes in Russia; we want to return them to leasing companies," a source at one of the airlines said."The airline would become an accomplice. The law provides a way to register in Russia, but does not oblige the airline to do so....It is the first step to the kidnapping of the airplanes."

Moscow's government insists special measures are needed in the face of sanctions on the economy that President Vladimir Putin has described as "akin to a declaration of war". Lawyers say a three-way legal battle between airlines, lessors and insurers could last for a decade."
Reuters 15 March 2022

As it turns out the major lessor, AerCap, terminated the lease on the aircraft and engines that it could not seize back, and 'wrote off' their value. Perhaps some time in the future the leases may be reactivated, but who knows what is in the contracts and what effect sanctions have on obligations by either party...

"In AerCap’s first-quarter report...the company said: “In response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and other countries, we terminated the leasing of all our aircraft and engines with Russian airlines. Prior to the Russian invasion, we had 135 aircraft and 14 engines on lease with Russian airlines, which represented approximately 5% of AerCap’s fleet by net book value as of December 31, 2021. We have removed 22 aircraft and 3 engines outside of Russia, and 113 aircraft and 11 engines remain in Russia.”
John Helmer 26 July 2022

In late December 2022 Aeroflot bought out 10 long range Boeing 777-300ER from the unnamed Irish company it was leasing them from (possibly Avolon, maybe SMBC). Russia already owns 9 wide-body 777-300ERs. According to Aeroflot this latest purchase was done under Russian government direction:

An airline representative told reporters..."The deal was implemented as part of the fulfillment of the Russian government's order 'to undertake measures to resolve legal relations with foreign lessors in order to ensure the transfer of ownership rights to the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation' and taking into account all necessary permits of Russian and foreign regulators...The company will continue to work "on further implementation of transactions for the buyout of aircraft in order to preserve the current fleet of foreign-made aircraft in its own operation and to expand the capabilities of their operation..." "
Interfax December 30 2022

Russia is already building it's own passenger aircraft, the MC-21/MS-21, the TU-214 and the SSJ-100 (Sukhoi Superjet 100).

Because of the sanctions affecting component availability, the United Aircraft Corporation (a Rostec subsidiary) can only deliver two MC-21's in 2022, rather than the 4 initially planned. A fully import-substituted version should be built by 2023, and certified with the substitute components for sale in 2024. The Government aims to deliver 18 new MC-21s by the end of 2025 (in September 2023 this was brought forward to 2024). Rostecs leasing company (Aviacapital-Service) signed lease agreements for 18 MC-21-310 aircraft and 34 SJ-100 with Aeroflot in late 2023.

Because the MC-21 is a short and medium haul aircraft (the largest market segment for passenger aircraft), if it can reach the international market it will compete with the Airbus A320 and Boeing 737 variants. According to Rostec, production costs for the Russian aircraft are lower, and the sale price consequently lower. To make the aircraft more attractive, it can be fitted with either the 'made in Russia' Aviadvigatel’s PD-14 engine, or the Pratt & Whitney PW1400G. The PD-14 engine develops 14 tonnes of thrust at takeoff. The United Engine Corporation (a Rostec company) owns a number of turbine, engine, and aviation related companies, of which Aviadvigatel is one. Aviadvigatel in turn owns the Perm Motor Plant, and on April 6 2023 UEC-Perm Motors announced the start of serial production of the PD-14 engine.UEC-Perm anticipates that 72 MS-21 medium haul MC-21 310 variant aircraft will be produced, and 160 PD-14 engines will be produced annually. This seems optimistic - unless the PD-14 wiull be used to replace the FrenchRussian engine in the SSJ.

The Sukhoi SSJ's contain almost no foreign parts, and 19 have already been built, and will be delivered.

Work on an import-part free version of the SSJ regional jet started in 2018, and a fully import-free version is expected to be available in 2024. This seems very optimistic, as the engine for the SSJ-100 is produced by a French-Russian joint venture, and the French components have stopped being delivered. Nevertheless, Aeroflot expects to receive 34 new SSJ's by the end of 2025. The Russian side is toying with the idea popular with the Germans, that is, some form of 'temporary' control of the local assets of the French company in order to ensure a supply of spare parts from stock on hand.

"To prevent disruptions, the Ministry of Industry and Trade reportedly proposed an idea to legalize the transfer of foreign companies’ property to Russia-registered enterprises. The move could ensure that the property of foreign companies, that terminated their business in Russia due to the international sanctions, would be temporarily managed by Russian entities and resources such as spare parts for SaM146 engines could be seized to secure the maintenance of SSJ100 jets"
AeroTimeHub, Gabriele Petrauskaite 31 March 2022

However in mid November 2022, the Russian government allocated an additional 44 billion rubles (about US $723 million) to the United Aircraft Corporation to accelerate the production of fully Russian-built jet engines, aiming for 50 engines to be produced in order to meet the target date for a fully import-free version of the SSJ regional jet (2024). Engine versions will also be built for the TU-214.

At the moment, only 2 or 3 of the longer range narrow body TU-214 aircraft are produced per year. Russia will build additional construction capacity and increase this to up to 10 per year. In early 2023 Government officials said a total of 11 TU-214 will be delivered to Aerflot by the end of 2025. They will replace the Airbus and Boeing planes Russia has used up until now.

Russia also produces a wide body passenger plane, the Ilyushin IL-96-300M a stretched version of the Il-96-300 with a range of about 10,000 kilometers, as well as the Soviet-era Ilyushin Il-76, a four-engine turbofan airlifter used for cargo.

The latest version of the Il-96 design, the Il-96-400M had its first test flight on 1 November 2023. This is a wide-body passenger version of the  Il-96-400T cargo aircraft.  It can carry 390 passengers, and has a range of about 8,000 kilometers. All Il-96-400 series aircraft have Russian built avionics and engines. This long range aircraft, while primarily intended for national use, may be a serious competitor for airbus in the future (in 'friendly' countries, at least).

The engine, the Aviadvigatel PS-90, is a new more powerful, high performance, high economy, low noise, reduced emission turbofan variant of the the basic PS-90A engine made by the Russian Aviadvigatel company. The basic engine has been used in Russia since 1992.

Aeroflot has placed an order for 339 aircraft, primarily for domestic use. The idea is to create economies of scale for the production of aircraft for the domestic regional network.

"Because if there is no big order for a domestic company, the cost will always be high. It will be individual custom production, as it were. But with a big order, the cost goes down and the final price goes down. In this case we are talking about a complicated product, an aircraft. A good, large order will certainly support the manufacturer of domestic aviation technology"
Vladimir Putin, 9 February 2023


"We can meet the current transportation demands thanks to a modern aircraft fleet. We still have 1,166 passenger airliners, including 94 long-distance ones.

This is enough to cater for domestic and international travel requirements. Our airlines have the necessary stocks of spare parts and consumable and expendable materials despite the more complicated supply logistics.

Maintenance and repair services are provided in Russia by three large, accredited organisations, which have the required number of personnel and the necessary equipment. The standards of flight safety requirements remain invariably high. We are closely monitoring the safety standards of our aircraft pool."
Vitaly Savelyev, Minister of Transport 19 July 2023 

In the meantime, spare parts for Russia's Boeing and Airbus aircraft fleet continue to be imported, albeit through a circuitous route of suppliers and re-suppliers.

"...dozens of shipments of copper wires, bolts, graphite and other parts marked as made in the United States by Boeing slipped into the warehouses of Aeroflot last year. They traversed obscure trading companies, free-trade zones and industrial parks in the United Arab Emirates and China, and then traveled into Russia, to help patch up Aeroflot’s dilapidated fleet.

In all, it shows that $14.4 million of U.S.-made aircraft parts were sent into Russia during the eight months, including $8.9 million of parts that are described as being manufactured or trademarked by the U.S. plane maker Boeing and sold into Russia via third parties.

Boeing said it had fully complied with U.S. sanctions and had suspended providing parts, maintenance and technical support for customers in Russia in early 2022. Experts in the aviation supply chain said the parts probably came from a variety of sources, such as existing overseas stocks from airlines and repair facilities or resellers who trade in scrapped parts..."
The New York Times 15 May 2023

In spite of what Mr Savelyev says, it seems there will be delays in meeting increasing demand for flights, and Russia can no longer lease foreign aircraft to meet that demand. If Aeroflot had ordered more planes domestically, this problem wouldn't exist, aircraft parts would be cheaper, and airfare would have been lower.

"Do you remember that I tried to convince you to buy more Russian-made planes when you were the chairman of Aeroflot? There were several heated debates between us then. You reasoned that our Western partners were reliable, that all was well and that they were good people.

Today, our aircraft producers cannot increase their production capacities overnight. This will take time, even though there is a demand for their products now, and it is growing. It is one more factor linked to the increase in tariffs. Nevertheless, I very much hope that this problem will be resolved and that transportation requirements will be met..."
Vladimir Putin 19 July 2023

Spare parts will be made for all the domestically produced planes at a proposed new manufacturing center in Kazan, capital of the Republic of Tatarstan. Russia hopes to have it up and running by the end of 2023. Its focus will be on parts for domestically manufactured aircraft.

Russia had relied heavily on Ukraine for helicopter parts, at least. But following the 2014 coup in Ukraine, Russia has joined China in joint production of aviation products - engines, helicopters, parts, specialised cockpit glass. A China-Russia joint company has already been buying Russia's Ka-32A11BC on contract to the Shanghai Ministry of Public Security. China uses the twin engine multi-purpose mi-8 and the newer mi-17 helicopters in various versions, both military and civilian. China has used the various helicopters produced by Russian Helicopter manufacturers for many years. Russia's  Ka-62 and Ansat helicopters are larely locally built. The Ansat is already "widely used", and the Mi-38 should come off the production lines in the not too distant future.

The Rostec state-owned plant in Ulan-Ude produces helicopters at a 'state of the art' modern facility, producing for customers all over the world. As well as high tech versions of the Mi-171, the 'Russian Helicopters' Rostec subsidiary is producing an advanced fully digital single engine civilian light helicopter, the VRT-500 for release about 2023. However, the engine was expected to be from Pratt & Whitney Canada - there is no chance for that now. Where an engine might come from is unclear at this point, but it is very likely it will be either Russian designed, built, and certified, or it will be from a reliable partner.

In 2022 Rostec developed a new passenger helicopter, the Mi-171A3. It carries 24 passengers and has a range of 1,000 kilometers - and even further with extra fuel tanks. It can also carry cargo, for example to offshore oil and gas platforms. It can work in quite extreme temperatures, from −50 to +50 degrees. This is important for work in the very cold Arctic Circle regions, especially as oil, gas, and mineral extraction industries work there.

Rostec also produced a small (200 kg takeoff weight) unmanned helicopter (the the BAS-200) in 2022. It can carry a payload of 50kgs, has been tested at temperatures lower than minus 50 degrees C.It's main use will be to deliver mail to remote areas in Siberia. It is also being (2023) tested for use in the special military operation.

Russia certifies the overseas companies that do maintenance and repair on the helicopters that Russia has sold. NATO is a party to the conflict in Ukraine, and repairs Ukraine's Russian helicopters via companies in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic. As of 14 July 2022, Russia has suspended their certification, and stopped supplying spare parts.

The prohibition on the import of foreign civilian airplanes has given the domestic civilian aviation industry a massive boost. Russia's United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) is now producing civil aircraft "in large quantities: not large enough yet, but we are striving towards this" - Sergey Chemezov, Rostec, May 2022

"I would like to note that in general, Russian air carriers will soon be thoroughly re-equipped. Our airlines, including Aeroflot, have placed the largest order package in modern history, for about 500 Russian-made mainline aircraft. By the way, as far as I know, the United Aircraft Corporation and Aeroflot have signed a respective agreement on the sidelines of this Eastern Economic Forum, and the figures in there are quite impressive – over a trillion, I think.

This high demand should become a powerful incentive for aircraft factories and design bureaux, for many related industries, including electronics and aircraft components, and, of course, for the schools training professional personnel including engineers and skilled blue-collar workers in the aviation industry."
Vladimir Putin 7 September 2022

The aviation industry is regarded as strategically important. Building new aircraft will be funded from the National Welfare fund, at a very low interest rate - 1.5%. The fund will provide 175 billion rubles (roughly USD$2.5 billion) in 2023. The aircraft projects funded by the Government are structured in such a way that the Finance Ministry  provides capital to a government-controlled aircraft leasing company (Aviakapital-Servis), which in turn is a subsidiary of Rostec, a state-owned corporation.

It is obvious Russia will never be at the mercy of foreign aircraft leasing corporations again. The profits from aircraft leasing will flow into government coffers, not into foreign-owned, Irish registered companies.

'Unsanctionable' aviation is a strategic and economic priority for Russia. However, while investment money has been made available, there is a disconnect between drawing up technical specifications for contracts - particularly military contracts - and letting out the work to the various aviation related businesses. Some still have no work for 2023. Unusually, the Russian President publicly castigated the Minister of Industry and Trade for the delays.

"Mr Manturov, as long as there are no manufacturer's specifications (passports), as you mentioned yourself, and companies do not have those, just like they have no contracts, there is no understanding of what they will do or what they need to do.It is taking too long. I know no contracts have been signed with the enterprises, the directors told me so. What are you fooling around for? When will the contracts be signed? This is my point....I want all of this to be done within a month...Do we not understand the circumstances we are in? Please complete this work within a month. Okay?...No, do not try to do your best; please get it done in a month. It must be done in a month, no later."
Vladimir Putin 11 January 2023

Russian is also at the cutting edge of developing a viable hypersonic aircraft. The Americans patented a design and operating principles for a hypersonic aircraft in 2013, but it has never been brought to reality. In 2023, Russia's Tupolev Design Bureau patented an innovative engine-cooling system that in principle should make a hypersonic aircraft a reality.

"Tupolev PJSC patented hypersonic airplane with a combined propulsion system, including two turbojet engines working on jet fuel and another – on cryogenic fuel...

The invention is designed to solve the problem of airframe heating during flight at supersonic and hypersonic speeds, caused by the interaction of external surfaces with the oncoming air flow.

“When operating a turbojet using cryogenic fuel, the airplane is accelerated to hypersonic speed. At the same time, due to increased friction of the external parts of the airframe on the air is their intense heating and to continue a long flight at hypersonic speed, it is necessary to cool them. For this purpose, cryogenic fuel flows from the tank through pipelines to the most heated parts of the airframe and engine, as a result of which there is an intensive gasification of cryogenic fuel in the pipelines. This process is endothermic in nature, in which heat is absorbed from the heated parts of the airframe and engine. The heated cryogenic fuel turns into a gaseous form and is fed into the combustion chamber of the engine and afterburner to create thrust,” the description explains.

The hypersonic airplane may use T-6 or T-8B thermostable fuel as aviation kerosene, and liquefied natural gas or liquefied hydrogen as cryogenic fuel."
RU Aviation, 8 November 2023

UAV's

Russia sees the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) business as having tremendous prospects, both for domestic use and for export. UAV's of difference sizes and sophistication have both military and civil applications, with new applications being developed all the time - from real-time adjusting fires of artillery to monitoring crop health, power lines and other infrastructure, through to the more mundane, such as pizza delivery. Given Russia's vast space and lack of transport infrastructure in the far East, UAV's could provide a cheap solution to urgent deliveries, such as delivering blood or critically important medications, as well as give early warning of outbreaks of fires in the vast conifer forests of the region.

"...this industry is critically important. Earlier in the meeting I said it is an exciting and greatly promising industry both from the perspective of the country's technological development and for ensuring our technological security and sovereignty, and from the business perspective. If this market is measured in one trillion rubles within the next few years, it means something.

Here is what I would like to say: the state has a stake in your success, and we will do our best to ensure this success...this technology can make any economy by far more competitive, and if we want structural changes – and we do – we certainly need to focus our efforts on developing this industry.

...to be honest, many things no longer have any secrecy, because thanks to large resolution – and our ill-wishers have high-level resolution technology – there is nothing secret left. And if something remains, you can, as you said, introduce certain bans on territories. But it seems to me that almost nothing should be banned here either."
Vladimir Putin, at a meeting with representatives of manufacturers and operators of unmanned aerial systems at the Rudnyovo industrial park, 27 April 2023

"Importantly, Russian companies operating in the field of unmanned aviation have many technical solutions to present, including different types of UAVs and infrastructure designs for safe use in our airspace, as well as a range of innovations in related fields, including artificial intelligence and other end-to-end technologies. All these things are interconnected to the point where some areas of unmanned aviation cannot exist without artificial intelligence. That is why this synergy is extremely important and exciting.

I am convinced that we have the potential in a critically important area like unmanned aircraft to ensure the proper level of technological sovereignty. Frankly, this is the area where we can and should not just replace imports but be one step ahead of our competitors. Today, our business leaders made it clear that such opportunities are available. In fact, our manufacturers are way ahead of their competitors and we must support them.

We need to support technology companies, start-up businesses, small and medium-sized companies to literally and figuratively spread their wings so that we can have our own national champions and industry leaders in domestic and global markets alike, and so that Russian-made drones are widely used to conquer the skies in the broadest sense of the word.

...digital aviation is possible only in a digital environment, which is why, to reiterate, it is important to make wider use of digital platforms based on Russian software and AI technology...They will be used to store, process and analyse data received from unmanned aerial systems. it is clear that drones are in demand and are widely used for military purposes. But the real market for them is in their civilian use – this is what I meant when I talked about a one-trillion-ruble market.

One great tool for boosting demand for a product is the creation of special operators who will make large purchases and then lease the UAVs. Mr Ditrikh [CEO of State Transport Leasing Company] who spoke today, proposed making his company the operator in this area. Here we need to help business at all levels: at the state, federal, regional and municipal levels...we must make the industry economically appealing, and then investors will come.

Just as with other segments of the UAV market, it is essential to prevent monopolies, to preserve competition based on a balance of interests between entrepreneurs, investors and the state."
Vladimir Putin 28 April 2023

The Russians want to deal with UAV technologies in a systems approach. They want to limit barriers to widespread use. For example to work around 'prohibited aerial recording areas', and integrate UAV's into existing systems - air traffic control, digital topographic geolocation, mapping, and navigation - taking into account the advanced features of autonomous operation and the application of applied wide-spectrum integrated artificial intelligence.

"Monitoring systems are being implemented. International organisations accepted them with permits that expire in 2040 and beyond. This is a rather conservative niche in aviation, with technology changing slowly.

Similar systems are produced in Western countries, the United States, the European countries. Russia is the only manufacturer in the SCO and BRICS.

What do we have here in this country as of today? Since, due to external conditions, some of the air navigation service revenues were lost and the technology implementation rates in the air navigation industry are beginning to slow down, of course, we need your attention for the development issues of unmanned aviation in order to keep moving forward.

Second, in view of the current situation and the developing relations with Asian and other countries, I would like to propose these options for export because this technology is something we do well."
Andrei Potemkin, Aviatelecominvest, at the Rudnyovo industrial park 27 April 2023

While visiting Rudnyovo industrial park Vladimir Putin noted that he had a conversation with "colleague from China" recently, in which he had a "frank conversation" covering many issues. The President met with the Chinese Minister of National Defense, Li Shangfu, on April 16 2023 (along with Minister of Defence Sergei Shoigu). Mr. Li Shangfu noted at the time that "military and military-technical cooperation between Russia and China is developing very well", and that under Mr. Xi's and Mr. Putin's "strategic leadership" the two countries "are actively developing cooperation in practical spheres". It seems logical that China would be an export market for Russian flight monitoring and control systems, if not for military UAV drones. Given the continuing military cooperation regular joint exercises, it may be that the two strategic partners are working to integrate some aspects of their autonomous drone systems.

MIlitary UAVs

Russia is now routinely using small drones to locate enemy positions in order to direct firepower at that position. New military intakes are being trained to operate small UAVs as part of integrated arms operations. Russia has also had extensive experience in Syria on the 'flip side', detecting and destroying small drones operated by western-backed jihadi armed criminals attempting to overthrow the legitimate Syrian government.  On examination, some of these were clearly engineered by western technical experts, while disguised in relatively crudely made bodies. Russia has learned from these experiences, and now has sophisticated detection and destruction means, including electronic jamming.  As always, these do not provide a perfect defense when defending a large area, but they do cut the number of successful strikes dramatically. As at 30 April 2023 Russia has destroyed 3,901 "unmanned aerial vehicles fielded by the NATO proxy army, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense. You can be sure that some of these drones will contain sophisticated anti-electronic warfare components made by the west - in other words, test versions of the latest western drone technology.

The nett result is that Russia is accumulating vast 'real world' experience in creating drone that can avoid detection and avoid electronic jamming. Which means it is opening up a big market for export versions of such devices.

According to Eduard Bagdasaryan, general director of the defense enterprise JSC Aerocon, Russia already has an export version of the lightweight (about 20 kg) turbo-prop Orlan reconnaissance drone with a laser target designator and a limited precision strike capacity.  Swappable tech units enhance its utility. In 2021 Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan both bought Orlans. Earlier Orlon class drones have been available since about 2017 for export. Their main use was real-time aerial reconnaissance and surveillance, electronic jamming, and radio signal detection.

Russia's JSC Sukhoi is developing a large (20 tonne) strike UAV, which they are calling the Okhotnik (‘Hunter’). The Russian military also has an advanced reconnaissance UAV (Forpost-R), based on the  Israeli IAI Searcher.

It is early days for the Russian military drone export market, but as it is being built from the ground up, the Russians are making every effort to ensure all components are locally sourced, including " the production and improvement of components including sensors, gauges, optics, matrix electronic systems, and the elemental base for radio-electronic systems” according to Eduard Bagdasaryan.

Suicide drones, akin to the US switchblade type suicide drone are also manufactured in Russia, possibly using Iranian components. The Geranium-2 ('Geran') suicide drone has proven effective in the proxy war when used against targets unprotected by modern air defenses. However, this drone likely depends on imported parts, and is maybe unlikely to be exported.

The Lancet-3 suicide drone (loitering munition) has however, proven a cheap and effective destroyer of positioned artillery (and sometimes mobile) and military equipment. According to the Russian Defense Minister, of the 59 USA government-provided M777 howitzers that the Russian forces have destroyed (April 2023), 25% were destroyed by the catapult-launched ZALA Lancet. These drones have been upgraded in the course of the war, and are now fitted with 3 types of warhead and improved electro-optical systems. They seem to be used in conjunction with reconnaissance drones and other target identification systems (acoustic, radar, etc) to locate targets. The drone operators can then go to within strike range of the target before launching the drones, then relocate and await a new target. Because these systems are light, highly accurate (important in urban environments), and untrackable to source,they are likely to dominate destruction of artillery, mobile radar installations, troop carriers, tanks (using thermobaric warheads) and other heavy gear in future battle frontlines. Long distance artillery will be saved for destroying troop concentrations.

Aviation Backdown Record

#1 In early August the UK removed sanctions on insurance and reinsurance of aircraft, aircraft parts, and aero-gas turbine engines. 

"I must note that recently Russian shipbuilding companies have faced difficulties with supplies of foreign equipment and parts for civilian vessels. We know the reasons for this: our Western partners are failing to comply with their commitments for purely political considerations...I recognise that the replacement of foreign equipment and components in the production of fishing and other civilian vessels may affect the parameters of current projects...

In general, let me stress that, as you know, the situation in the world and the actions of our Western partners have shown once again that we need be proactive in developing our own competences in shipbuilding. I have said this many times.

It is impossible to substitute every imported part, and there is no need to do this, but it is necessary to achieve technological sovereignty in critical positions of ship equipment, and in the most significant production processes and technologies. We need to make sure that as many operations as possible to equip, retrofit and repair ships are carried out in Russia...

We need to set in motion the initiatives of Russian shipbuilders, their domestic suppliers and customers, to support the upgrading of our shipyards and offer convenient financial mechanisms so that new orders for high-quality, modern vessels, including ice-class ships, are completed in Russia in order to increase the capacities of the Northern Sea Route and our other Arctic projects. All this is necessary to increase the workload of domestic enterprises and to create jobs in this complex, high-tech industry...

Construction of high-tonnage ships is one of the main prospective areas in Russian shipbuilding. We have already decided to subsidise part of the costs of these projects when they are connected with the localisation of plants and the creation of cutting-edge Russian technologies in this area."
Vladimir Putin 18 August 2022


"We propose implementing a ...programme for low-cost water transport leasing. We would like you, Mr President, to support the proposal for issuing loans from the National Welfare Fund at 1.5 percent per annum and easing the requirements concerning return on investment. We have already formed an investment project, and the STLC [State Transport Leasing Company] in conjunction with the Finance Ministry have agreed on its parameters.

Our shipyards plan to build 260 civilian vessels in 2023–2027 as part of this order which will include a wide range of equipment of varying deadweight that can be used for various purposes. Cargo ships, such as tankers, container ships, barges, tugs, and dry cargo ships, including Arctic class vessels, will account for the bulk of orders.

The first two electric river boats that are part of a total order of 21 such boats placed by Moscow are undergoing trials.

We are focusing separately on building fishing vessels and dredgers to be used for breaking water artery bottlenecks which is particularly important with more logistics routes coming into service."
Deputy Prime Minister – Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov 11 January 2023

 "I would like to note that icebreakers have been operating 365 days a year for the past two years, as Russian companies have already redirected three million tonnes of cargo from the Suez Canal to the Northern Sea Route during the summer-autumn period, and these are the results of the latest navigation.

As I mentioned earlier, ice conditions remain challenging even in summer, and at times we do not have enough icebreakers. We recognise this need. Therefore, we believe that building more icebreakers is essential, as demand is high. We are already building bridges across rivers, even in areas with limited transport. Where icebreakers are present, traffic will increase."
Sergei Zybko, General Director of Glavsevmorput 27 March 2025

"In particular, following the amendments, the item concerning the development of infrastructure of the Arctic zone now provides for the construction at Russian shipyards of the following ships for operating in water area of the Northern Sea Route:
at least seven Project 22220 nuclear-powered icebreakers;
 the Leader nuclear-power icebreaker flagship;
and an additional four non-nuclear-powered icebreakers;
16 emergency response and rescue vessels of different capacity by 2024;
30 emergency response and rescue vessels of different capacity by 2030,
 three hydrographic survey vessels and two aids to navigation;

expanded use of LNG and compressed natural gas at sea and river transport in water area of the Northern Sea Route and domestic small nuclear power plants for supplying consumers with energy; comprehensive and interlinked development of maritime, air, railway and auto transport infrastructure of the Arctic zone; development of an automatic system for identifying vessels and monitoring them at a long distance; and provision of remote sensing data to interested customers in accordance with Russian Federation laws."
'Amendments to the Strategy for Developing the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation and Ensuring National Security until 2035' Executive Order signed 27 February, 2023

"Russian shipping companies that transport petroleum products and liquefied natural gas are already successfully operating in the northern seas. Now we need to create enabling conditions for effective domestic operators who will be shipping containers, coal, bulk and other goods across the Arctic. We are also open to create joint ventures in this segment. International logistics operators could make profitable investments in such companies. Moreover, in addition to capital and technology, they could contribute part of their merchant fleet to such projects."
Vladimir Putin 27 march 2025

Medical industry

Russia produced the world's first covid 19 vaccine, showing it was fully capable of meeting the needs for technically advanced immunilogical products domestically.
Rostec's Natsimbio (National Immunobiological Company) subsidiary supplied over 100 million sets of all kinds of vaccines "from the coronavirus to flu, and various other diseases" to domestic customers in Russia. Most were domestically manufactured.

Russia's Direct Investment Fund financed ChemRar to develop the world's first anti-coronavirus drug, Avifavir. It is currently sold in at least 15 countries. The Russia's Direct Investment Fund is also backing a project to localise production of the Sputnik V vaccine in Brazil.

In 2010 Prime Minister Vladimir Putin announced the Russian government plan to 'onshore' the pharmaceutical sector of the economy. This seems realistic with regard to antibiotics, as generic (off patent) antibiotics can in principle be manufactured by anyone from various precursor chemicals. China dominates the manufacture and global supply of these chemicals because it has low labor costs, government subsidies, and lower environmental standards. Given their global dominance, China has economies of scale.

The antibiotics made from these precursors are immensely important. The broad spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic Ciprofloxacin for example, is highly important in treating bacterial sepsis within the body cavity, bone and joint infections, respiratory infections, anthrax, typhoid, urinary tract infections and so on. China has the intention of becoming the 'pharmacy of the world', and will achieve this goal for medium and smaller countries. Large technically advanced countries could make the precursor chemicals, but will need government subsidies to do so.

"Today, China is the main source of the key ingredients for both penicillin and another class of antibiotics, cephalosporins. Together these drugs comprise two-thirds of the antibiotics used in the U.S. each day...when a giant cargo ship ran aground in the Suez Canal, global trade was snarled. More than 200 vessels carrying billions of dollars’ worth of goods were left waiting to get through the canal. Such a bottleneck could pale in comparison to potential antibiotic shortages. If U.S.-China tensions were to escalate over Taiwan, trade corridors and supply chains would be at risk of massive disruption—including the freighters expected to bring antibiotics to America’s hospitals and pharmacies."
MarketWatch 28 April 2021

It is clear to me that the US intends to manufacture critically important medicines domestically in future for strategic reasons (90% of the drugs consumed in USA are generics, most finished generics are imported - mostly from India - and the 3 major US resident generic drug manufacturers Mylan, Sandoz and Teva have relocated generic drug production to China. Western domestic single batch preparation of generic antibiotics precursors and intermediates is low profit margin, inefficient, and can't compete with slowly emerging continuous flow production [CFM]).
 

"Continuous manufacturing is best described as a series of processes that optimize drug production to a continued flow of drugs. This is in contrast to the widely used batch manufacturing, which consists of complex processes rendered across the world where materials are made in large batches, rather than in a consistent flow.

Denoted as one of the top 10 emerging technologies, a November 2021 World Economic Forum (WEF) report stated that CFM could effectively “revolutionize” the process of drug manufacturing by allowing greater personalization of each medicine made on-demand that would not need to be shipped across multiple locations. Yet adopting CFM will likely be a long process, particularly while producing complicated assets like biologics.

...As of now, Baxendale says that some aspects of CFM are appearing in the pharmaceutical industry rather than a wholesale transfer to flow chemistry. New tools and new processes still need to be created, and many companies consider CFM at a proof-of-principle stage, says Baxendale. Although CFM could play an increasingly more visible role in the industry, Kappe anticipates seeing the use of both batch manufacturing and CFM in a hybrid system in the years to come."
 Pharmaceutical Technology May 20, 2022

India has a massive trade imbalance with China, and is very dependent on China for the active ingredients for medicine manufacture. Strategically, India is likely to produce at least the more important active ingredients locally in the future.

Russia is somewhat dependent on imports from India at this stage. I suspect Russia will indeed slowly move to re-shore manufacture of critical medicines. In principle Russia can import active ingredients from China at very favorable prices, but once again, they would be wise to expand their domestic active ingredient production facilities, at least for medicines of critical importance. And if they have the capital to further build the sector, Russia certainly has the educational-technical capacity to develop continuous flow techniques right from the very start - driving down costs.

Russia already subsidises strategically important industries. It already takes a 51% shareholding in industries that are strategically important. Expanding and subsidising a chemical precursor industry for domestic insurance would be fully in line with their current strategic practice.

"Ravi Uday Bhaskar: Sanctions do not apply to medicines and agriculture. So, even discontinuation of supply in the shadow of western sanctions may not have a serious impact because Russia possesses its own capabilities to manufacture active pharmaceutical ingredients as well as formulations.

In fact, Russia's domestic market is good, and they are capable of getting things done.

Sputnik: China is a major supplier of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) which are the raw materials for medicine. If Beijing tries to fill the void in the Russian market created by European countries ceasing to supply medicines, do you fear any disruption in the supply of basic materials?

Ravi Uday Bhaskar: I do not think so. China is one of the most prominent suppliers of APIs, intermediates, and basic chemicals. That's why it will not have any serious effect on supply of raw materials from China.

Europe also imports APIs and other raw materials from China. Ukraine may face problems with raw materials but Russia will not face any disruption as it has good relations with China. And Russia itself is capable of tackling challenges resulting from western sanctions.

Sputnik International 11 March 2022

The 'Pharma-2020' and 'Pharma-2030' initiatives required Western pharmaceutical companies locate their production in Russia. Abbott, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer are among the large Western drug companies producing vaccines, generic medicines, or Russian branded products.Russia remains a lucrative market for western (mainly European) pharma companies.

Russia sold out Veropharm, its major medical products company, in 2014 to the US owned Abbott Laboratories. The pharmaceutical industry in general is exempt from the western illegal trade restrictions, and Abbott intend to remain operating in Russia, as are most US major drug companies.

"We remain committed to providing essential health products to those in need in Ukraine, Russia, and the region, in compliance with current sanctions and while adapting to the rapidly changing situation on the ground.”
Johnson and Johnson spokesperson March 2022

"...major opportunities will open up if they leave, and the market will accommodate new players. I am 100 percent confident that the substitution of foreign owners and manufacturers will improve the quality of services for Russian citizens. I am 100 percent confident."
Vladimir Putin April 20, 2022

“We take good care of those foreign businessmen who stay [in Russia]. We have extremely great respect and the same care for those businessmen who, under pressure, are now forced to wait it out, but who have already said that they will resume their activities here as soon as possible"
Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesman, 12 June 2022

"You have said that we need to navigate between the Scylla of high inflation and the Charybdis of declining investment activity. In fact, this is a fundamental issue that includes the subject of floating rates, when we are offered “key plus” loans, which often transfer duration risks from banks to enterprises. The role of enterprises is different – ​​they need to build factories, not engage in financial speculation, as they are not really equipped for this.

By the way, building factories now is a financially risky business, because those who did not time their construction correctly within the cycle sometimes do not have the opportunity to complete it. There is no revenue yet, and many are on the verge of bankruptcy. We need to help them as well."
Alexei Repik, Head of the Delovaya Rossiya National Public Organisation  6 May 2025

"Furthermore – at the risk of sounding too mundane – we expanded into online marketplaces. It is a fixture of modern life, something everyone does. We established PSB Market – a dedicated shopping platform for the new regions. The ordered goods are delivered within an average of three days to pick-up points. We offer nearly three million items at average Russian prices. I do not see why people should not benefit from purchasing goods online."
Pyotr Fradkov. CEO Bank PSB 15 May 2025

"...we need to analyse possible formats for the return of companies from unfriendly countries that have exited the Russian market, taking into account the interests of Russian investors."
Vladimir Putin 6 May 2025

"...when we hear a growing number of signals from our historical partners, who are also our rivals, about discussing a plan for their return to the Russian market, their fear of losing it forever, and their readiness to take the first step to reconcile with us – actually retreating their steps – we must act carefully to formulate an objective and balanced stance on this matter.

The economy should not shut down. Companies from other countries are welcome to come to our market, and we welcome healthy competition in general. Likewise, we welcome potential foreign investment in Russian companies that have reclaimed their respective home markets.

When it comes to foreign companies, we believe it would be wrong to treat every one of them the same way. There are companies that, despite difficulties, hardships, and pressure from their own politicians, continued to operate here and to invest in our country. They should be treated with great care and respect, as if they were our own companies.

Others scaled down their presence or left altogether, but did so respectfully without harming consumers. Some transferred their businesses to Russian investors with an option to return some time in the future.

In our view, the most appropriate format is for them to return by way of creating joint ventures with their Russian partners, with the latter maintaining a certain level of shareholder control in the form of a majority stake or a golden share. I believe this format should be mandatory for companies operating in the strategic industries.

The companies that put a padlock on their door and let their Russian counterparts down, and failed to fulfill their contractual or warranty obligations must first compensate for the losses we have incurred before they can return. In case of damage caused to consumers, they should pay adequate compensation amounts to the budget of the Russian Federation.

Companies that engaged in outright anti-Russia rhetoric, supported the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and publicly accused Russia while refusing to do business with us are not welcome back...Generally speaking, before any dialogue about a possible return can even begin, I believe such companies must first offer a public apology."
Alexei Repik Chairman of the Delovaya Rossiya National Public Organisation 13 May 2025 

"They enter the market, they gain a foothold, and before you know it, there is no getting rid of them. ...Now they have foolishly banned their companies from working here. However, we see that they are reaching out to me, large businesses, too, and they want to come back. For God’s sake, please. But...first of all, we need to look at how they behaved...

We definitely need to look at each applicant’s behaviour. Those who have been disrespecting and insulting us should remain where they are; I wish them the best."
Vladimir Putin 13 May 2025



" ...When considering the return of foreign companies, we will be assessing not only how those companies conducted themselves – we agree with the approach – but also the amounts invested by domestic businesses. If our entrepreneurs have taken a particular market niche and invested in it, we must, without a doubt, give them some time to see a return on the investment.

We will be reviewing each case individually to make sure that businesses that believed in the promise of the future and invested in the domestic market are given an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on their investment.

There is one more point. In many cases, foreign companies left Russia and ceased supplying products that are vital to us. This has been especially true in the pharmaceutical sector: several Western companies quit our market and stopped supplying essential medicines...we have implemented a special mechanism and established a dedicated government commission that, in essence, grants compulsory licenses to our domestic companies that are willing to manufacture the products that we need.

We are in no way violating the rights of those foreign companies. Our manufacturers will pay appropriate royalties at a reasonable rate to the Western rights holders. These payments will be deposited into special accounts and be held there until the situation gets resolved and those funds will be unlocked to those foreign companies. Importantly, Russian companies are producing the medicines that we need.

We are prepared to apply the same approach to other types of products...we will not sit and wait for Western companies to decide whether or not to resume supplying key technologies. We are ready to take decisive action in this regard."
Maxim Reshetnikov Minister of Economic Development 13 May 2025

"Margarita Simonyan: Mr President, I would like to show you something that I have brought with me especially. It is juice, and it used to be so nicely coloured. It does not matter what sort of juice it is; you cannot even see the brand here, although it is a popular one. And now – do you see? A small picture and the rest is white. Why is that? And this is happening on a massive scale.Because we ran out of paint. The producer of paint for such packaging has left Russia, and the producer of the packaging also announced that they are leaving. I bought this two weeks ago, and soon this will disappear.

Vladimir Putin: Whenever any decisions are taken, the key issues must be singled out. What is key for us? Being independent, sovereign and ensuring future-oriented development both now and for the future generations? Or having packaging today?

Unless we have sovereignty, we will soon have to buy everything and will only produce oil, gas, hemp fibre, saddles and sell rough logs abroad....

...The issue is not about import substitution, the issue is to establish our own capabilities based on progress in education, science and new promising schools of engineering.

We will always be given packaging materials and other simple things, event telephones and smartphones. What we have never been given and never will be is critically important technologies. We have never been given them before even though we had problem-free relations with our Western partners in the previous decades. This is the problem.

And when we begin to stand up for our rights, we are immediately slapped with some sanctions and restrictions; this is what the problem is all about.

Therefore, we must commit ourselves to that and have the capacity to reproduce critically important technologies on the basis of what I mentioned.
And with that base we will always be able to manufacture the goods you mentioned: packaging materials, telephones and smartphones. If we realise that and keep focusing on solving fundamental issues, we will resolve everything else without a problem.

Let me reiterate: others are already coming to that place – those who produce the packaging materials, those who produce the paints. We are also starting to produce paints and other consumer goods as well as goods employed in industry in a broader sense. We can make anything – I have absolutely no doubt about that.

Obviously, some things will be lost, other things will be made on a new basis, much more advanced – the way it happened earlier. Therefore, when we talk about import substitution, we will substitute some thing(s) while other things will have to be done on a totally new promising basis of our own making."
Margarita Simonyan, CEO RT News, and Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum Plenary Session 17 June 2022

"Both manufacturing and retail trade increased in April with output in the processing sectors growing 2.9 percent year-on-year in January-April. Let me remind you that it was manufacturing that suffered the toughest blow due to disruptions in cooperation and value chains...

...there was a lot of anxiety among business leaders a year ago. In fact, few people could anticipate how events would unfold. In this context, it was essential that we give businesses something they could rely on, build confidence in government policy, emphasise our unwavering commitment to fundamental market mechanisms, the freedom of entrepreneurship and guarantee that private property was protected."
Vladimir Putin June 16, 2023

"...Western countries used any pretext, or no pretext at all, to refuse to fulfill their obligations, including removing barriers to our agricultural exports.

This resulted in direct losses of Russian farmers and enterprises producing fertilisers. Now the Minister said that, due to a 30–40 percent discount on our grain on the world markets, the losses of Russian farmers, if converted into US dollars, amounted to $1.2 billion.

In addition to this, the growing costs of seagoing freight to carry goods, costs of international financial settlements and other transactions have resulted in the halving of profitability for grain exports."
Vladimir Putin 19 July 2023

"What are the sectors reporting the highest, the best performance? Computer, electronics and optical products manufacturing with a 30.4 percent increase. Very good. Manufacturing of metallurgical products increased 29.7 percent, almost reaching 30 percent. Electrical equipment manufacturing grew 22 percent, while the production of transport vehicles, excluding automobiles, was up 22.1 percent. We will discuss cars separately, since this sector is a special case.

We have a slight decline in the production of medicine, and timber processing decreased. For timber processing ... it all comes down to logistics. Here, we need to lend a helping hand to those working in this sector."
Vladimir Putin 3 August 2023 

As the west's proxy war on Russia ground on, the need to localise manufacture of almost everything within Russia became more acute. By 2024 the President was calling for what amounts to 'extreme homeshoring', advocating for imports to drop to no more than 17% of GDP by 2030. Obviously, this calls for a massive increase in manufacturing. The President was clear that he saw the future of Russia as a high tech manufacturer, with income share from oil and gas steadily decreasing in importance. This will require a lot of government support of one kind or another.

"Technological sovereignty projects should become an engine to renew our industry and help the entire economy reach an advanced level of efficiency and competitiveness. I propose setting the goal of increasing the share of domestic high-tech goods and services on the domestic market by 150 percent within the next six years, and increasing the volume of non-commodity and non-energy exports by at least two-thirds.

I will cite a few more figures. In 1999, the share of imports in our country reached 26 percent of GDP meaning that imports accounted for almost 30 percent of our market. Last year, it was 19 percent of GDP, or 32 trillion rubles.

Before 2030, we need to reach a level of imports of no more than 17 percent of GDP.

This means that we must produce ourselves many more consumer and other goods, including medicine, equipment, machine tools, and vehicles. We are unable to produce everything, and we do not need to, but the Government knows what it needs to work on.

I would like to point out that in the next six years the gross added value in manufacturing should increase by at least 40 percent compared to 2022. This accelerated industrial development implies the creation of thousands of new enterprises and modern highly paid jobs.

We have already prepared an industrial “menu” of sorts. The companies that implement industrial projects will be able to choose suitable support measures, agreements on investment protection and incentives, special investment contracts, a cluster investment platform, and the like. We have devised and are already implementing a great deal of such instruments. And we will further develop these mechanisms.

In the next six years, we will additionally allocate 120 billion rubles to subsidise corporate R&D projects and to bolster the system of industrial mortgages. We will also use this programme to additionally build and renovate over 10 million square metres of industrial floorspace.

I would like to add the following for the sake of comparison, in addition to the pace we have already achieved.

So, let’s draw some comparisons. Today, in Russia we build about four million square metres of industrial floorspace every year. It is a substantial indicator of the modernisation of our industrial capacities as it is, and we will additionally build 10 million square metres, as I have stated.

Next, we will invest 300 billion rubles in the Industrial Development Fund. We will almost double its capital and will focus its attention on supporting high-tech projects. At least 200 billion rubles will be additionally allocated within the framework of a cluster innovation platform to subsidise interest rates for projects that manufacture prioritised industrial products.

I propose increasing the depreciation calculation base to stimulate the modernisation of industrial facilities in the manufacturing sector. It will amount to 200 percent of spending on Russian-made equipment and R&D. It may sound boring, but I will explain what it means. If a company buys Russian-made lathes for 10 billion rubles, it can reduce its tax base by 20 million rubles. It amounts to substantial assistance.

We will continue to develop industrial technology parks focused on small and medium-sized companies in the priority technological spheres. It is important to make use of the advantages of the cluster approach, when companies grow together with their subcontractors and suppliers, and their cooperation will have a beneficial effect on all parties. I would like to point out to the Government that we must create at least 100 such platforms by 2030. They will act as growth points throughout the national territory and encourage investment.

We have set a goal to add 70 percent to investment in key sectors by 2030. By the way, we have had good dynamics here; very good, I would say in fact....

...The share of non-commodity industries in the growth structure now stands at well over 90 percent, which means that the economy has become more complex and technological, and thus, much more sustainable.

Russia is Europe's largest economy in terms of gross domestic product and purchasing power parity, and the world’s fifth largest economy."
Vladimir Putin 29 February 2024

"Understandably, state-owned companies acted as the main growth drivers through government procurement orders. Specifically, you have just outlined the core sectors: radio electronics, metallurgy, railroad rolling stock manufacturing, and importantly, machine tool manufacturing, which are at 35 percent this year, which means that growth for these sectors exceeded 20 percent. Leather products and clothing also reported substantial gains with growth above five percent."
Denis Manturov, Minister of Industry and Trade, 3 August 2023 

"You mentioned the cluster platform. We have selected 16 projects worth over 360 billion rubles for this form of support. I would like to mention several interesting projects such as a flat-rolled stainless steel plant in the Volgograd Region, a high purity polysilicon facility in Chuvashia, and the manufacturing of component parts for transport engineering, diesel engines and pharmaceutics. There are another 33 projects worth over 1 trillion rubles that we are considering."
Denis Manturov, Minister of Industry and Trade, 3 August 2023

"The project to create the country's largest drapery fabrics production enterprise in the Nizhny Novgorod Region received comprehensive assistance from the Industrial Development Fund. The entire complex of Pervaya Tkatskaya Fabrika (First Weaving Factory) was built from scratch and within a short timeframe. The factory has already started manufacturing high-demand products such as furnishing and upholstery fabrics, home textiles, car and aircraft interior upholstery fabrics, and workwear fabrics.

It is encouraging that our partners from Belarus have already become the main suppliers of raw materials for our enterprise.

The company already has a number of customers from outside Russia as well. Work on export contracts is underway. It should be noted that the capacity of this enterprise allows us to almost triple the output of such products in our country."
Anton Alikhanov, Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation 9 October 2024


The textile industry in Russia is third largest contributor to GDP after Food and Beverages industry. The Russian textile industry heavily manufactures technical textiles rather than the commercial apparels and garments that of denims and casual wear apparels. The Russian textile industry relies heavily on the foreign investors rather than the native investors. Almost 80% of the textile market is controlled by foreign investors and 20% by the Russian investors. In order to satisfy its domestic demands, texpreneurs from Russia have opted for the potential markets that can cater to the ever growing domestic demands of the nation.

russia Textile Business Statistics for All country Import and Export Data

• Russia Textile And Apparel Sector Exports Contribution : USD $ 949.62 M (in Million)

• Russia Textile And Clothing Sector Import Contribution : USD $ 11182.68 M (in Million)

• Top 10 Textile and Clothing Export Countries By Russia

Russia Textile Market Sector Exports Products to majorly in Kazakhstan with USD $ 262.79 M (in Million) estimate export market Share (27.67%), Belarus USD $ 262.79 M (in Million) Exports Sector Contribution (27.67%), Ukraine USD $ 87.68 M (in Million) Exports Share (9.23%), Germany USD $ 30.38 M (in Million) Exports Market Percentage (3.2%), Poland USD $ 28.28 M (in Million) Exports Contribution (2.98%).

• Russia's Top 10 Textile and Garment Imports From Countries

Russia Imports Textile clothing Products Worldwide Are As Follow China around USD $ 3868.71 M (in Million) with import share (34.6%), Bangladesh around USD $ 845.95 M (in Million) with import share (7.56%), Belarus around USD $ 751.87 M (in Million) with import share (6.72%), Italy around USD $ 683.96 M (in Million) with import share (6.12%), Turkey around USD $ 617.48 M (in Million) with import share (5.52%).

• Russia Textile exports trade data in value by country

• Russia Import of Textile and Garment Trade Data Value By Country

https://www.textileinfomedia.com/textile-industry-in-russia 2023-2024

"In the past 15 years, funding has increased six times over with your support, which affects the development rate of the entire transport infrastructure.

Since 2020, funding has increased by 69 percent. Our funding has almost doubled. These are enormous sums."
Vitaly Savelyev, Minister of Transport 9 February 2023


"we are implementing all our previously planned projects.

In terms of infrastructure, as you understand, this means trillions, and we are building roads and opening new routes every week.

This is very important, because it is not just to take one ride there and back.

A road means life, and economic life too begins with it: small and medium-sized businesses appear immediately, because there was no other way to get there, but now it is possible. A completely different picture of the world emerges."
Vladimir Putin 01 January 2024 

"Notably, 84 airfields have been upgraded and eight new regional and hub airports have been built over the past 20 years. New Russian aircraft are being designed and promising, logistically optimised routes are being developed.

This work will continue. Airports will be retrofitted. The number of direct flights and modern transport hubs will increase. Special attention will be paid to renewing the airline fleet.

As I noted earlier, we will address these challenges relying on domestic technology and the capacities of domestic manufacturers. We will create and develop a range of new and upgraded aircraft and localise production as much as possible...our goal is to make the industry competitive, modern, and responsive to current demands and national development goals."
Vladimir Putin 9 February 2023

"Last year, it was Russian Railways and other Russian carriers that quickly adjusted their logistics strategies and directed additional commodity flows to the Far East, to our ports in the north and south of the country. They have made their contribution, which I can describe as immense, to repelling the sanctions attacks on our country and creating conditions for economic revival and growth, and for delivering our products to promising markets around the world."
Vladimirr Putin 15 December 2023

"The industry’s leader, Russian Railways, is one of the biggest customers for the Russian machine-engineering industry, industrial production in general, the construction industry and professional training; this company is a source of stable long-term orders for many sectors of the economy, science and tech businesses. In the past 20 years, Russian Railways has purchased over 9,000 Russian locomotives; more than 700 mainline locomotives have entered service."
Vladimir Putin 15 December 2023

"In 2020, the Corporate University of Russian Railways was declared the best in the world. It is especially important that the company is developing a comprehensive education system, helping people on a path from school to modern jobs. You give special attention to schoolchildren and the development of their talents at your vocational centres at schools and colleges. There are 26 children’s railway lines and six “Quantoriums” established with them, which specialise in IT and robotics. These initiatives are very commendable."
Vladimir Putin 15 December 2023 

"Russian Railways’ development policy stimulates key innovative sectors of the economy. Needless to say, we must continue exploring new types of equipment and other products....Of course, including locomotives for ultra-heavy trains that are particularly in demand in the Eastern Operating Domain, I do not need to tell this audience how important this is.

Of course, it is necessary to develop infrastructure for high-speed passenger railways.

High-speed operations are the future of the Russian railway industry. This means a new quality of services and additional opportunities for millions of people, the country’s economy, businesses, tourism and our commercial ties, as well as for the development of the regions and cities."
Vladimir Putin 15 December 2023

"The three North-South corridors that I mentioned, one in the European part of Russia, another in Siberia and another in the Far East, will pave the way to integrating and connecting our railway and transport routes with logistics hubs in the south and southeast of Eurasia.

Importantly, these projects will create a huge domain for the long-term development of entire industries and vast territories in the Russian Federation, and will produce a significant and positive effect on our country and for our citizens."
Vladimir Putin 15 December 2023

Soon after the start of the operation to expel Ukrainian forces from the newly declared breakaway republics, the EU and US closed it's airspace to Russian flights. This effectively ended most Russian overseas tourism, putting Russia's Aeroflot's fleet of aircraft almost out of work. As a result, Russia has focused on domestic air transport, subsidising domestic airfares until October 2022, which were then extended to March 2023. Russian airlines also received a subsidy in 2022 (174.2 billion rubles) to make up for lost international air routes and restrictions on flights to 11 airports in southern and central Russia associated with the operation in Ukraine. These restrictions will stay in place until August 2022, at least. Air cargo normally a profitable industry, has had to be subsidised for the first time.

Aeroflot is one airline of the 3 airlines in the 73.77% state-owned Aeroflot Group. The Group's airlines have about 45% market share. The Aeroflot Group consists of 9 companies, of which only 3 companies are airlines. Aeroflot has 171 aircraft, and in 2023 carried 25 million passengers. Pobeda, Aeroflot Groups low cost budget airline, has 41 aircraft and carried 13 million passengers in 2023, as compared to 11 million in 2022. The third of Aeroflot Groups airlines is Rossiya.with highest number of Russian aircraft (as different from foreign leased or foreign planes 're-registered' to Russian legal entities) with 78 of its 136 planes being Russian Sukhoi Superjets. The total number of passengers served by Aeroflot in 2023 was 47 million, up 15% on 2022. 9.5 milion of these were international passengers - up 77% on 2022.

The government's overall objective was for Russian airlines to carry at least 100 million passengers in 2022. By the end of November 2022 there were 71.4 million domestic passengers. The 'performance indicator' was changed to the carriage of about 102 million domestic passengers by the end of 2023, predicated on the 11 restricted airports re-opening (an indicator of the governments thinking on when the military operation would end, perhaps). These 11 airports would normally account for about 19 million passenger trips. Even so, based on trends to July 2023, the government expects to hit the 100 million passenger movement target by the end of 2023 - with 11 airports still closed.

Government's 2023 projection is that once the 11 airports reopen, passenger journeys will increase to 120 million per year, not far off the 2019 pre-sanction level of 128 million.

Domestic transport remains heavily subsidised, and this will be continued in 2024, with airfare prices being slightly cheaper in 2022 than 2021, even though Russian jet fuel is 45% more expensive in 2022 than in 2021.

As at early 2023 the government subsidises tickets "for socially important destinations, as well as fares for pensioners, people with disabilities, students, and families with many children".

Russia's low cost airline, Pobeda, while "operating in difficult conditions, including the pandemic and the current period of sanctions" carries little debt, and is profitable. It carried over 11 million people in 2022 and has grown into Russia's third-largest national airline.

By the end of 2022 Russia's fifteen International airlines were flying to 22 countries, carrying not only cargo, but 15.7 million passengers internationally. Total passengers carried, domestic and international, totaled 87 million people by the end of 2022.  Russia has flights from 25 foreign countries, encompassing 51 different companies. By mid 2023 direct flights increased to 24 countries, 20 million international passenger journeys expected by the end of the year - an increase of 12% over the same period the previous year. The restrictions on Russians travelling abroad has shifted demand in destinations. Cuba, which as of late 2022 accepted the Russian 'Mir' card, a VISA card equivalent, has seen a marked jump in Russian tourists. In 2022 there were only charter flights run by one Russian company, and now Rossiya Airlines flies twice a week from Moscow to Cuba's famous high-end Varadero beach resort.

Russia's flight booking system ran on American and European software, which meant the movement of Russian citizens both domestically and internationally could be harvested by American and European spy agencies; and no doubt was. In 2022 state-owned Rostec developed and launched 'Leonardo', a secure Russian computerised flight booking system, which is now used by more than 60 airlines.

"The other elements are the construction of the Northern Latitudinal Railway, as we call it, towards the ports on the Arctic Ocean and the Yamal Peninsula in the north of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, and a new North Siberian Railway from the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area towards our largest railway network comprising the Trans-Siberian Railway and Baikal-Amur Mainline."
Vladimir Putin, 18 October 2023

"At the turn of the century, the BAM helped open the Asian-Pacific markets to the Russian economy, provided a reliable transit route for entire Eurasia, and, in conjunction with the Trans-Siberian Railway, became a truly strategic transport corridor of not only national but also global significance."
Vladimir Putin 23 April 2024

"The changed conditions acted as a cold shower on many participants of the transport and logistics market and sobered them up. The departure of the world’s largest sea carriers from the Russian market, difficulties with chartering vessels and the closure of traditional routes, especially via Europe, forced us to look for new ways and options to ensure transportation.

Business solved this problem. As you can see, store shelves are not empty, businesses did not stop, foreign trade indicators, while declining, but there is no collapse. One of the recent months’ results is that the country’s transport and logistics system has become much more resistant to external influences. For example, Russia took the first steps toward building its own trading fleet, including a container fleet.

I believe that the country needs a “Russian Maersk”. Its creation would be the reasonable completion of the entire logistical chain we are building in our country and in the world today. We would close all its components and get not only great synergy effects, but also real logistical independence.    

Besides, we would be able to distribute cargo flows between transport corridors evenly.

...I am sure that Russia, as a transit country, could play a much more important role in global logistics. Now it is 2-3% of the world’ commodity flows but, taking into account the length of our territories and transit opportunities, especially railroad transportation, well-developed port infrastructure, and new routes, including via the NSR, these results could be higher.

...the implementation and a multiple increase, for example, in container transit could become a separate, highly profitable sector of the economy.

The transportation of containers is always followed by the development of terminal facilities, engineering, traction rolling stock. There will be a multiplicative effect, giving a boost to the production of platforms and containers, which are still not being manufactured in sufficient volumes in Russia. We still buy the bulk of containers abroad, in China.

Can you imagine what the effect would be from transit operations alone? No doubt this is a question of the future, the conditions, including geopolitical ones, must mature."
Sergey Shishkarev, Board Chairman of Delo Group 22 November 2022 interviewed by TASS News

"Since the London Market’s Joint War Committee (JWC) listed the Black Sea a week before the conflict began, much has happened...Apart from the physical damage to ships and many vessels being trapped, underwriters have been faced with a variety of challenges from the ever expanding sanctions regimes which failed to deter the attack, have failed to stop the conflict and have not yet changed the political path adopted by Russia.

For insurers whose reason for existence is to support trade, it is difficult to thrive in an environment where they are being compelled to stop themselves and others from trading. Having put expensive compliance teams in place and embedded due diligence, they are under intense pressure. This is further evidenced in the advent of self-sanctioning where entities take a policy decision not to broke or write any new or renewal business in certain countries. The situation is legally constricted as running risks cannot simply be cancelled unless there is contractual reason to do so.

Problems have arisen from the speed and number of measures as well as the difference between sanctions and asset freezes, plus variations between different national measures. These can leave clients at least partially without cover and underwriters similarly without reinsurance. Additionally, the reinsurance market has felt the need to utilise territorial exclusions, so many underwriters are now significantly and unexpectedly exposed without the protection they had expected to have.

The situation remains very fluid, with new developments daily, so underwriters will proceed with great caution, if at all, as the penalties for errors are high."
Neil Roberts, Head of Marine and Aviation at Lloyd’s Market Association June 2022

"This year we are going to draft and adopt a new strategy for the development of the Russian Arctic up to 2035. It is to combine measures stipulated in our national projects and state programmes, the investment plans of infrastructure companies and programmes for developing Arctic regions and cities."
Vladimir Putin 9 April 2019

"Russia offered its partners the opportunity to actively use its transit potential. More than that, we are inviting all interested countries to get directly involved in its development, and we are ready to provide reliable icebreaker escort, communications and supplies. As soon as next year, navigation for ice-class vessels along the entire length of the Northern Sea Route will become possible all year round."
Vladimir Putin, 18 October 2023 

"..plans are in place to increase the capacity and turnover of our northern ports through the introduction of innovative and environmentally friendly solutions, including unmanned and automated cargo handling equipment. This will happen soon enough. For example, the capacity of the Murmansk transport hub should be amplified at least three times over in the next few years due to the construction of new terminals and the expansion of railway links.

I would like to add that our partners from Belarus, China, the United Arab Emirates and other countries are showing keen interest in this project and in the development of the Arctic transport infrastructure in general. It is a very interesting undertaking from a business point of view.

We plan to create large multimodal hubs to operate as key logistics centres of the Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor. Not only will these hubs serve as ports where convoys of ships are formed or Russian and foreign cargos are handled; they will include industrial facilities for the production of manufactured goods.

To improve the logistical stability of the Trans-Arctic Corridor, I ask the Government to draft plans to expand the capacity of existing seaports in the Arctic, and decide where on the Arctic coast new ports should be built, and how soon the adjacent infrastructure needs to be developed. I am primarily referring to the links between the sea harbours and the national railway network.

In this regard, fifth, we will need to develop the Arctic Operating Domain – similar to the Eastern Operating Domain, which includes the Baikal-Amur Mainline and the Trans-Siberian Railway. The project must include the modernisation of the Northern Railway in the Komi Republic and the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Area.

We are aware of the situation at Russian Railways today; we know what challenges the company is facing. However, we need to think about what I just said, about the development of the Northern Railway – and we need to start today.

What opportunities will this open? The regions of Siberia, the Urals, and Russia’s North-West will receive direct access to the North, to the Arctic ports, which will lessen the load on the Trans-Siberian Railway and promote effective use of sea transport. In addition, there will be new points of access to the Arctic from the North-South corridor, which connects us with Central Asia and the Gulf states.

And of course, the potential of the Arctic’s inland waterways, our great rivers – the Lena, Yenisei, and Ob – must be unlocked at a new technological level to develop the Trans-Arctic route. This will help, among other things, to enhance the Northern Supply Haul system so as to ensure a reliable supply of foodstuffs and other goods for Arctic residents.

I want to stress specially that the resources of the state, regions, and businesses, including both state-owned and private banks, must be combined to pursue these and other major initiatives. The capabilities of the domestic stock market must also be utilised to attract capital to the Arctic infrastructure.

Infrastructure projects are indeed complex, costly and have a long pay-back period. But it is these projects that provide Russia’s real transport sovereignty at a new level. And I am confident that if our foreign partners join these projects, it will guarantee them long-term investments with good returns. Therefore, we cannot put off these projects for later, we must launch and start pursuing them now, as soon as possible.

Apparently, it is important to resort to flexible approaches here, to attract both Russian and foreign investors, as I have just mentioned. In this regard, I propose that we consider creating a special project office under the auspices of our leading development institution, VEB, which will provide support for transport, logistics, and infrastructure projects in the Arctic, as well as urban development projects in the region. It will also become an entity where potential investors can address directly and receive support they need. I ask the Government to prepare respective proposals.

In addition, I instruct the Government to join hands with Rosatom, VEB and the State Council’s dedicated commission to endorse the financial, economic and organisational model for the development of the Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor by August 1 of this year."
Vladimir Putin, 27 march 2025

"We have begun establishing science and education centres in various Russian regions; they integrate the capabilities of universities, research institutes, the business community and the real economy.

One of our Arctic regions will certainly receive such a centre that will ensure the development of fundamental research and will help address the applied and practical tasks of developing the Arctic.

The Arctic offers us immense challenges. And we can only respond effectively if we do it together. One such challenge, as I have told you, is to maintain balance between economic development and preservation of the Arctic environment, conservation of its unique and fragile ecosystems, and, of course, clean-up of the environmental damage accumulated through the economic activity in the past decades, which was extensive from time to time. We have been conducting a major clean-up of Arctic areas for a number of years. Starting in 2012, we have removed and utilised over 80,000 metric tonnes of waste.

In the coming years we will liquidate six major environmental damage sites in Arkhangelsk and Murmansk regions, in the Nenets Autonomous Area, Karelia and Yakutia as part of the Clean Country federal project. We are also to clean up over 200 square kilometres in the Kola Bay area.

We will also develop a system of specially protected natural territories and reserves. Above all, I mean the Russian Arctic national park. It is important to take additional measures to develop civilised ecotourism and build the required infrastructure there."
Vladimir Putin 9 April 2019

"...we have discrepancies with Sauli [Niinistö,President of Finland] on data relating to warming in the Arctic. According to our data, the Arctic is warming four times faster than the rest of the world, and Russia is warming 2.5 times faster than the rest of the world. These may be different calculations, but both of these are really disturbing trends."
Vladimir Putin 9 April 2019

"Our goal to significantly boost the freight traffic and bring it up to 80 million tonnes by 2025 on the Northern Sea Route alone was outlined in the 2018 Address to the Federal Assembly.

Just 10 to 15 years ago, this figure looked absolutely out of reach, whereas today it is a realistic, carefully calculated and concrete goal.

As of last year, the volume of traffic on the Northern Sea Route already reached 20 million tonnes. This is three times – I reiterate – three times more than the Soviet record set in 1987, when the Soviet Union transported 6.5 million tonnes using this route. Now, it is 20 million tonnes.
Vladimir Putin 9 April 2019

"Originally, ‘operational’ FONOPs  were designed as the next step to supplement diplomatic efforts to challenge excessive claims or when these efforts have proven fruitless. An example of this, the USCG did a FONOP 35 years ago in the North Western Passage, much to the annoyance of Canada.

As Odell stated, “the United States does not conduct FONOPs vis-à-vis all excessive maritime claims everywhere in the world every year”. The pattern, tempo and nature of ‘operational’ FONOPs has principally focused on those countries who happen not to agree with the “rules-based...international order”, a concept exclusively promoted by Washington to uphold its global primacy.

While other countries who take umbrage at what they perceive as excessive claims, they go to the ITLOS [International Law of the Sea - US is not a party] to try to settle the matter, the U.S. sends in the navy. What does that say?"
Andrei Raevsky 01 December 2020

"...the USS John S. McCain, which entered the Sea of Japan several days ago, violated Russia’s territorial waters in the Peter the Great Gulf, "passing the maritime border by two kilometers." "The Pacific Fleet’s Admiral Vinogradov anti-submarine destroyer used an international communication channel to warn the foreign vessel that such actions were unacceptable and the violator could be forced out of the country’s territorial waters in a ramming maneuver. After the warming was issued and the Admiral Vinogradov changed its course, the USS John S. McCain destroyer returned to international waters..."
Russian Ministry of Defense

"...when ratifying the Convention on the Law of the Sea, it [the Russian Federation] does not accept the procedures provided for in Section 2 of Part XV, which lead to binding decisions on disputes regarding military activities, including naval activities by government vessels."
Maria Zakharova, Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman 14 October 2021

"Earlier this year, for example, it was reported the US Coast Guard was forced to delay the commissioning of a new polar-class icebreaker until 2027, while Russia’s Rosatomflot signed a contract on the construction of its sixth and seventh Arktika-class nuclear icebreakers, which will join the 50+ icebreakers of various classes already in operation. For the moment, the United States operates just two icebreakers, a state of affairs which should complicate its freedom of navigation ambitions for years to come."
Sputnik 22 May 2023

"...Say it takes you 33 days to get from Yokohama to Rotterdam via the Indian Ocean and 20 days via the Northern Sea Route, as the distance between these cities via the Northern Sea Route is slightly over 7,000 kilometres – 7,300 – and is almost 12,000 kilometres via the Indian Ocean.

This is the point – it saves you a lot of fuel and time, and so, of course, it will be very attractive not only to China, Japan, South Korea and Indonesia but it may even evolve into a very interesting and promising area of international cooperation....

...our goal is to make the Northern Sea Route safe and lucrative for shippers, and appealing both in terms of the quality of services and price.

In particular, the icebreaker escort fee must be competitive and reasonable. The state invests in this operation in order to minimise the tariff burden on carriers and other businesses

We encourage our foreign partners to join us in our efforts to create hub ports at the end points of the route. I mean the Murmansk transport hub and port infrastructure in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. In addition, we plan to upgrade the Arctic coast harbours, including the river-sea traffic." capabilities.

...If necessary, we will expand the capitalisation of the Far East Development Fund for selective financing of Arctic projects."
Vladimir Putin 9 April 2019

"Of course, we should also develop promising areas such as tourism. The North and the Arctic are unique concentrations of natural, historical, and spiritual landmarks. The region boasts an extraordinarily rich cultural mosaic. Over a million tourists visit the Arctic annually to explore its landscapes, witness the northern lights, engage in Arctic fishing, ride dog sleds, or journey to polar archipelagos.

The number of tourists is growing. Consequently, new initiatives in this sphere are emerging, such as an Arctic tourism centre with a ski resort component in the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Area or an aqua-thermal spa and year-round hotel complex in Karelia. I request that both the federal Government and regional authorities support such initiatives, which reveal new facets of the Arctic and help heighten interest in the region.

I also propose considering the inclusion of White Sea tourism infrastructure development in the Five Seas and Lake Baikal federal project.

To make the Arctic accessible for mass tourism, transport connectivity is crucial – from the repair and construction of roads to the development of air travel.

I reiterate that we have extended subsidised airfare rates for flights to Arctic cities. Last year, approximately 800,000 passengers utilised this opportunity. This year, subsidised tickets are available for over 70 air routes.

At the same time, Far Northern airports, particularly smaller ones, require modernisation. In the coming years, under the relevant national project, we will upgrade 16 airfields in the Arctic Zone, including those in Salekhard, Arkhangelsk, Naryan-Mar, and Vorkuta.

Overall, our objective is to maintain an extensive airport network in the Arctic – from large and medium-sized airfields to small landing strips. This is also vital to ensure year-round accessibility of residential areas and the operation of air ambulance services."
Vladimir Putin 27 March 2025

#1 "...as part of the sixth sanctions package introduced last month, the EU prohibited European companies from insuring and reinsuring sea shipments of Russian oil and oil products to countries outside the European Union.
As a result, major energy players such as Vitol, Glencore, Trafigura, Shell and Total stopped trading Russian oil for third countries.

Now, however, they will be able to resume business with Russia. The legal details of the new provision will be published in the Official Journal of the EU"
RT 23 July 2022

#2 In early August the UK removed sanctions on insurance and reinsurance of ships carrying oil to third countries (not the the EU). The UK is the single major ship insurer in Europe. Russia has made it illegal to insure with 'unfriendly countries' anyway, and has developed it's own insurance businesses for it's own ships. For example, State-owned Sovcomflot, Russia's biggest shipping company, now insures it's own fleet itself. through 'Russian National Reinsurance Co'. (also state-owned). The Russian National Reinsurance Company has become the main reinsurer of Russian ships.
What this 'sanctions backdown' really means is that London is losing insurance business, and this is a futile attempt to rescue a bit of what little is left.

#3 "...we have provided clarity to industry and partners. This includes the UK’s publication of a General Licence  as well as the U.S. General Licence 6B ; and updated and detailed EU guidance  .  These provisions make clear that banks, insurers, shippers, and other actors can continue to bring Russian food and fertilizer to the world.

We call on our global partners, and on the actors, industries and services involved in agricultural trade, to take note of these provisions; to act in accordance with them; to bring Ukrainian and Russian food and fertilizer to meet acute demand; and to continue to advance the accessibility of food to all."
US - UK Govt. joint statement 14 November 2022

In other words, the Russians were correct when they repeatedly asserted that no one in the west would provide banking services, shipping services and insurance service to Russian efforts to export their grains and fertiliser. It may have been 'technically  legal' but no western company believed the USA or UK when they said companies could serve the export of Russian grain and fertiliser without any form of punishment. Western corporates have no trust, no faith, in the assurances of their own government. Why risk payment being locked up again on the whim of a politician? If it can happen once, it can happen again.

"As for containers, there has definitely been a full-scale turnaround to the east. Both exporters and importers want to deliver cargo via the Far East, so all infrastructure facilities there: railroads, land border crossings, and sea terminals, have become overloaded.

Our North-West direction has decreased from over 100 thousand containers per month to 10 thousand.

Now Ust-Luga and terminals in St. Petersburg are gradually coming back to life due to the growth of non-container cargo turnover and the beginning of vessel calls from Southeast Asia, particularly from China...We have a big investment program for the Far East. Last year we gave up coal transshipment in favor of containers...

In general, we should say openly – in terms of technological readiness for market reorientation, both our own and our colleagues’ infrastructure cannot cope with the current volumes...

...vessels stand for a long time at Far Eastern ports, waiting for loading (although this year VSC managed to reduce the average duration of the roadstead by a third compared to last year). And this leads to serious financial losses for marine operators, including us.

...the impact of negative external factors can last indefinitely, and emergency methods will not work anymore. In our opinion, it is necessary not to patch up the holes, but to prevent their appearance in the future."
Sergey Shishkarev, Board Chairman of Delo Group 22 November 2022 interviewed by TASS News

"We do not support confrontation, we prefer dialogue. But we cannot ignore the restrictions they have imposed. Therefore, on September 29, a Presidential Executive Order was signed to ban international road transport across Russia by foreign operators from those countries that have imposed restrictions on our individuals and legal entities. Any new attacks will also not go unanswered. No one should have any illusions about this.
Sergey Lavrov 8 October 2022

"In our opinion, the transition to a single logistics ecosystem can be implemented in two stages. The first stage should involve the implementation of common standards for data exchange and the development of regulations for the processing of digital documents for all participants of the supply chain.

The second stage is creation of the digital services for logistics management, including optimization of routes for cargo movement, coordination of electronic transportation plans, and monitoring and coordination of their execution"
Sergey Shishkarev, Board Chairman of Delo Group 22 November 2022 interviewed by TASS News

"The Russian Industry and Trade Ministry has offered imposing a ban on exports of wood and a number of articles made from it until the end of this year. The ban will cover unfriendly countries that have been put on the list, including the US and EU countries. Birch raw wood (the main raw material for paper production) and chip fuel placed under the ban are critical goods for the European Union...In its turn, the ban on exports of peeler block (raw material for plywood production) amid the EU’s anti-dumping duties on ready plywood from Russia will prevent European producers from boosting capacities of their own enterprises using Russian raw materials"
Russian Industry and Trade Ministry 11 March 2022

"Russia has 82 billion cubic metres of timber, compared to 126 billion in Brazil, 47 billion in the United States, 30 billion in Canada, and slightly over 14 billion in China.

The actual felling volume in Russia is well below the annual allowable cut, while the timber industry’s contribution to Russia’s GDP is rather modest at about 1 percent, or 0.99 percent, to be precise.

Clearly, the industry has proper reserves and good prospects for long-term growth."
Vladimir Putin 10 February 2023

"However, soon supplies to the EU could become questionable. The thing is that Belarusian enterprises won’t be able to obtain new international certificates of compliance of standards of sustainable forest management and certificates of conformity guaranteeing respect for the rights of wood industry workers known as FSC."
Belsat 4 March 2022

"The situation regarding wood processing is uneven. You are absolutely right in saying that it is necessary to support this industry and you made all the required decisions in February. We have already produced the necessary regulations for this support, especially concerning wood processing plants in the North-West.

Indeed, logistics is the main problem and we are now reorienting all flows from the West to the friendly countries. These include not only countries in the East, but also in Latin America and Africa, especially after the forum – we are getting an additional order from our friends.

We have increased our furniture production by 15 percent. This growth is within our plants. Western manufacturers are vacating their niches."
Denis Manturov, Minister of Industry and Trade, 3 August 2023 

"We must certainly stay the strategic course for expanding the timber industry, which includes...increasing demand at home, expanding our own processing capacities and manufacturing high-quality products with high added value, including wooden houses, furniture, paper, and so on. Also, it is important...to expand the use of biofuels in the housing and utilities sector.

Mortgage tools should be used more extensively in housing construction. Wooden houses are a good choice for relocating people from structurally deficient residential buildings...as well as for rural health posts and other social facilities....the availability of the latest timber processing technologies and equipment is of paramount importance.

...wooden housing construction embraces all phases from lumber harvesting to completion of construction. Without a doubt, we need to expand these capacities. I would like the Government to draft a set of measures to support the manufacturing of wooden house kits.

And one more point. We have a lot of construction under national projects and other state and regional programmes. Urgent care centres, cultural centres, libraries, Russian Post offices, etc...I believe it is possible to resort to wood construction technology on a bigger scale and use common designs for building projects, while of course observing all safety requirements. "

Vladimir Putin 10 February 2023


"...it is important to constantly improve the efficiency of support for deep timber processing, so that we can have more modern companies with well-paid jobs in our country, and Russian companies were in a position to meet the domestic demand and to offer products with high added value, such as furniture, paper, wood chemistry products, and, of course, to further develop such a promising and sought-after area as the production of building kits for the construction of environmentally friendly and comfortable wooden houses."
Vladimir Putin 14 April 2025

"An equally important project for our timber industry, which is ramping up production, is a new pulp and paperboard mill in Ust-Ilimsk. Upon reaching its estimated capacity of 600,000 tonnes of solid containerboard, the enterprise will become the world's third largest producer of such products.

This will allow us not only to cover all domestic market needs, but also to press Western suppliers thus becoming a leader, as we hope, in the market of the People's Republic of China."
Anton Alikhanov, Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation 9 October 2024

"...we are a leader, and guarantor, of food security, and not just in the Russian Federation but throughout the world.

Over the past decade, we have increased production of all types of fertilisers by 40% – up to 55 million tonnes. We have surpassed the United States and India in this respect, and we are now second in the world after China. This is really an enormous achievement.

Of course, our priority is the Russian domestic market. We are fully meeting demand. In the past decade, fertiliser sales in the Russian market have increased by 2.5 times – to 13.2 million tonnes. This is an all-time record.

And, of course, we are now the world's largest exporter of mineral fertilisers, with an export capacity of about 37–38 million tonnes, although that was in 2021. In 2022, it is clear that we had a slight drop due to the sanctions and all the export problems that happened."
President of the Russian Association of Fertiliser Producers, Andrei Guryev, April 27, 2023



"...we are ready to fully meet the demand of agricultural producers in Indonesia and other friendly countries for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilisers and raw materials for their production. Russia’s share of mineral fertiliser in the world market amounts to 11 percent and exceeds 20 percent in some varieties. Last year, we sent abroad 37 million tonnes of these products.

We certainly intend to continue fulfilling in good faith all of our contractual obligations for the supply of food, fertiliser, energy resources and other critical goods. In this context, we consider it vital to restore the supply chains disrupted by sanctions"
Vladimir Putin, 30 June 2022

In February 2022 Lithuania banned the transhipment of Belarusian potassium from its port of Klaipeda. Almost all Belarusian potash (10-11 million tonnes per year) was exported from there. As a result of Lithuania's actions, new facility are being built at St. Petersgurg to export the Belarus production. Lithuania will lose it's lucrative port charge income.

"Considering that Russia and Belarus are the biggest suppliers of fertiliser to the global market, I would like to discuss with you ways of satisfying the demand on the global market and our permanent customers.

I think we have 15 percent of the global trade, and 25 percent in some fertilisers, which is a very significant amount in the world markets.
Low use of fertiliser obviously brings down the next year’s harvest outlook. All that is very regrettable."
Vladimir Putin June 25 2022

"The EU has indeed avoided a direct and comprehensive ban on the import of Russian agricultural products.

...despite prohibiting the import of certain types of Russian fertilizers, the EU has introduced exemptions to fulfill its own needs.

The import of fertilizers from Russia into the EU this and the following seasons (until 9 July 2023) is permitted in an amount equal to the average annual volume of imports of these products (imports of potassium chloride are allowed in the amount of 837,570 tonnes, other restricted fertilizers - in the amount of 1,577,807 tonnes).

EU Member States are also authorised to grant, at their own discretion, access to EU ports of vessels flying the Russian flag, as well as entry to the EU of Russian road carriers for the purposes of importing or transporting agricultural products, including fertilizers and wheat, that are not subject to restrictions.

...What the EU fails to mention is that anti-Russian unilateral sanctions are still distinctly detrimental for key Russian producers and exporters of agricultural products. They affect directly or indirectly the export, financial and transport capabilities of Russia, including in the food sector. The ultimate goal of these actions is obvious - to undermine the Russian economy, including the agro-industrial complex.

...Stringent measures are being introduced or proposed to police the proper implementation of the anti-Russian sanctions regime, including criminal liability for either circumventing or assisting in circumventing unilateral sanctions, which, according to instigators of these measures, should induce economic operators in EU Member States to terminate their cooperation with Russian partners. Consequently, cargo transports, as well financial and insurance services are seriously hindered and logistics chains are disrupted, also due to total customs inspection of all goods imported into the EU from Russia. Western financial and commercial entities, intimidated by the prospect of penalties for violating the sanctions regime, are either delaying or frequently annulling their transactions.

Furthermore, individual restrictions have been imposed against the owners and chief executives of leading Russian producers and exporters of fertilizers - Uralchem, Eurochem, PhosAgro, Akron...The future of factories that belong to them in some EU Member States also hangs in the balance.

Evidently, the European Union is engaged in a deliberate campaign to obstruct the export of Russian food products and fertilizers, including to prevent Russia's access to third markets. Behind the smoke-screen of its habitual hypocritical rhetoric the EU is busy aggravating what is already a precarious situation in terms of global food security."
Russian Foreign Ministry press release 3 June 2022

"It is worth mentioning that Mazepin hadn’t owned ToAz for some time, he took control of it with a raid just three months before the war. The former British controlling partners, the Bkit consortium, complained that their representatives were blocked by the Russian special police forces, the Omon, at the entrance of the shareholders’ meeting, which voted to exclude them from the board in their absence. An appeal to the Dublin court is open against the raid on ToAz. But in the meantime, Mazepin has formally transferred control of the group to two close allies since it has been under sanctions."
The Odessa Journal, 21 October 2022


"The Executive Order was signed in response to unfriendly actions taken by the United States of America and the foreign states and international organisations that sided with it, seeking to impose restrictive measures on Russian citizens and legal entities in violation of international law, in order to uphold the national interests of the Russian Federation and in accordance with Federal Law On Special Economic Measures and Measures of Coercion of December 30, 2006, Federal Law On Security of December 28, 2010, and Federal Law On Measures (Countermeasures) Against Unfriendly Actions by the United States of America or Other Foreign Countries of June 4, 2018.

The President resolved to introduce a temporary procedure for making decisions by a general meetings of participants (shareholders), a board of directors (a supervisory board), or a collective executive body of a Russian economic entity on issues within their competence.

...If a body of a Russian economic entity includes persons from unfriendly foreign states, the participants (shareholders) of the Russian economic entity who are not nationals of unfriendly foreign states shall be entitled to rule that the votes of said persons shall not be counted when establishing a quorum or in voting. In such case, a decision shall be made notwithstanding the provisions of the founding documents of a Russian economic entity or its corporate agreement. The temporary procedure established by the Executive Order shall remain in effect until December 31, 2023, inclusive."
Executive Order On Temporary Procedure for Making Decisions in Certain Russian Economic Entities,17 January 2023

"We hope that we will open the port in Taman by the end of 2023, and that will change the situation where the Russian Federation – a major producer of ammonia for as long as the country has existed – has been left with… Well, not a single ammonia transshipment port has been built, and we are tied down, or dependent on other countries that have such ports.

Therefore, we want to close this gap. We are working jointly with the Ministry of Industry and Trade, with the Government of the Krasnodar Territory, and other agencies. But we would like to ask you to help – to temporarily include transshipment and transportation of ammonia in Odessa in the grain deal for us, so that our product can also go to developing countries, including Africa."
Dmitry Mazepin, Chairman of Uralchem, Chairman of the Commission for the Production and Trade of Fertilizers meeting with Vladimir Putin 23 November 2022

#1 On 22nd July 2022 Russia came to an agreement with the United Nations to allow facilitate grain ships leaving Ukraine via the Black Sea. Turkiye and the UN will inspect the empty ships (with Russian and presumably Ukrainian observers) as they enter the Black sea in order to confirm they are not carrying weapons to Ukraine.
Part of the price for this agreement is that the sanctions on Russian fertilisers must be removed. I think this refers to sanctions on insurance, port access, and shipping companies, as well as on specific sanctioned products.

"We are aware that the European Commission has lifted the sanctions on the supplies of Russian fertilisers, and we certainly welcome this decision. However, the European Commission issued a clarification on this matter on August 10, whereby only EU countries can buy our fertilisers, but we and Belarus cannot ship our fertilisers through the ports of European countries to the developing economies of Asia, Africa or Latin America, which is an act of discrimination against our partners from these parts of the world.

Massive amounts of our fertilisers (100,000 tonnes, I believe) are stored at the ports of some European countries. Our manufacturers – primarily of potash fertilizer – are willing to give them for free to the developing countries in dire need of these fertilisers. I want the Foreign Ministry to work through this issue"
Vladimir Putin 9 September 2022


"I would like to ask the UN Secretariat – I discussed this matter with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres the day before yesterday – to use its influence on the European Commission’s decision not in word, but in deed and to demand that they, our colleagues from the European Commission, lift these clearly discriminatory restrictions on developing countries and provide access for Russian fertilisers to their markets.

Also, the day before yesterday I apprised Secretary-General Guterres of the fact that 300,000 tonnes of Russian fertilisers are stocked at the EU seaports. We are ready to make them available to developing countries for free."
Vladimir Putin 16 September 2022

262,000 tonnes remain blocked as at late November 2022.

Dmitry Mazepin "We have shipped a trial batch of 20,000 tonnes or less than ten percent of our impounded volumes to Malawi. The UN and Ms Rebeca Grynspan actively addressed this issue, and they helped us. The Netherlands is now ready to ship this batch to us.

We are facing a problem because we are unable to pay freight charges, even if we are delivering free fertiliser to Africa. We have reached an agreement with the UN that we will remit the money to the UN. They will charter a ship that will sail to the Netherlands, take on the free batch and sail to a port in Mozambique because, according to the UN, Malawi is now hard pressed for fertiliser.

This is why I would now like to raise this issue and to obtain your approval, so that we can reach agreement on the entire initiative. We would contact the UN and the African Union, in order to unblock our entire 262,000-tonne batch. By agreement with the Chairperson of the African Union, they will list countries that are hard pressed for fertiliser, and we are ready to make these deals.
Vladimir Putin: Are you talking about free deliveries?
Dmitry Mazepin: Yes, free deliveries."
Dmitry Mazepin, Chairman of Uralchem, Chairman of the Commission for the Production and Trade of Fertilizers meeting with Vladimir Putin 23 November 2022

By January 2023, the EAU had released only one consignment of fertiliser, given by Russia to Malawi for free (and Russia paid the shipping). Russia is now pressuring the UN to stop 'slow walking' work to make the EU releases the fertiliser. Russia has pledged to give some of this fertiliser for free to the Kingdom of Eswatina (formerly Swaziland).

"Since UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres strongly advocated the settlement of all issues related to unimpeded supply of Russian grain and fertilisers to the world markets, we agreed today that the Eswatini government and Russia will address him with a request to promptly resolve the issue of using part of the Russian fertilisers seized in EU ports for the needs of the people of Eswatini free of charge. These fertilisers are available for free."
Sergey Lavrov, 23 January 2023  

The truth is revealed. The EU is holding Russian/Belarusan bulk fertiliser to ransom in European ports, preventing the transhipment to their destination. Port storage charges will now be massive. So the companies are willing to donate the fertiliser to poor countries and write off the loss. The companies are most unlikely to pay the port charges (even if they could), and are most unlikely to ever use those european ports again.

Forcing Russia (and Belarus) to export through Russian ports might add costs for Belarus, but exports via the Black Sea is probably the shortest and cheapest route anyway, even if infrastructure might be a bottleneck.. This EU restriction gives Russia the high ground - Russia will not supply Europe with any fertiliser so long as Russia cannot send fertiliser to the global south via European ports. Once again, the Europeans are over a barrel - either totally remove the sanctions without any conditions (and possibly wipe the port charges), or go buy fertiliser from 'somewhere else'. Of course, Russia may hold out for full restitution - payment for the fertiliser, cancellation of port charges, and complete wiping clean of all sanctions.

"Another eloquent example of the Western sanctions’ disruptive effect is that they are even preventing a free transfer of some 280,000 tonnes of Russian fertilisers to the poorest countries. The products are now stranded in the ports of Latvia, Estonia, Belgium and the Netherlands. It must be emphasised that these Russian products are intended as a donation to those in need, while all the transit costs are being covered by Russia...However, most of the products are still being held in Latvia. That country’s authorities are refusing to give our fertilisers to the poorest countries, for purely political reasons."
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Vershinin 17 November 2022


Russian fertilizer producer Uralchem-Uralkali has agreed with the Netherlands, Estonia and Belgium to supply cargoes of fertilizers stranded in those countries to Africa, TASS news agency reported on Saturday.

It cited Uralchem’s head Dmitry Konyaev as saying the group was “actively working with the U.N. to organise free deliveries to Africa of more than 262,000 tonnes of mineral fertilizers that have been ‘frozen’ in EU countries”.

The Netherlands said on Friday that following a request from the United Nations it would allow shipment to Malawi of 20,000 tonnes of Russian fertilizer that had been stuck in the port of Rotterdam because of sanctions against a Russian individual, whom it did not identify. It said a condition of the agreement was that the sanctioned person and the Russian company would earn nothing from the transaction.
Reuters 12 November 2022

The 'sanctioned' individual that Reuters mentioned is, of course, the owner of Uralchem-Uralkai, Dmitry Mazepin. The UN has organised the shipping, and Russia has paid the cost of shipping. Did the UN pay Netherlands, Estonia and Belgium the cost of storage of the illegally seized cargoes?

"Some clients and financial assets have left the banks that were hit by the sanctions and gone to banks with foreign participation and sanctions-free regional banks that are comfortable for businesses now. The number of flows has increased five-fold.

Looking at our financial sector overall, there are about 320 banks operating in Russia, including about 115 banks working with budget funds.

Today, we are monitoring about 20 trillion rubles. About 80 percent of all budget funds are concentrated in our 15 largest banks

...we managed to cut the share of budget funds being channelled through high-risk banks to a third, and the involvement of 'technical firms', fly-by-night companies, by about 40 percent. More than 43 billion rubles allocated from the country’s budget has been saved; 32 billion has been transferred back to the budget, and the assets of officials who were implicated in criminal cases have been seized – assets worth about 7 billion rubles. We have helped initiate over a thousand criminal proceedings.

As for countering the financing of terrorism, we have officially identified about 1,500 people as terrorists, including legal entities and terrorist groups linked with nationalists in Ukraine.

Reciprocal “freezing” works particularly well...Reciprocal “freezing” is when our foreign colleagues give us their lists of terrorists that they believe to be in our country or are wanted. In turn, we give them our lists of people who we think are abroad. We have received lists with about 1,500 names from them and have given them lists with about 2,000 names.

Over 280 cases on terrorism have been initiated and are being conducted with our participation.

Unfortunately, I must say that non-profit organisations are being used today to raise funds and then give them to terrorists. We are also working with the FSB on this."
Yury Chikhanchin, Head of the Federal Service for Financial Monitoring, 9 March 2023

"We are past the period of losses, which was an incredibly difficult time for us. We incurred a major loss since we lost almost all of our foreign assets, except in the CIS countries. Without a doubt, the SDN sanctions made it impossible for us to operate on exchanges in any currency, be it US dollars or euros.

So, over the past period, we have fully formed the reserves to cover all existing issues. We are beginning to operate as usual, and there can be no doubt about our sustainability, since we will show financial results. With the Central Bank’s permission, we began to disclose our financial results, because we want everyone to see that all our problems are in the past.

We have ensured the bank’s functioning in challenging conditions, meaning the border areas, as well. I traveled around our border areas, and saw that our employees continue to work in extremely difficult circumstances...We are the only core bank for the people in the small towns in the Belgorod, Kursk and Voronezh regions. A situation where we stop providing financial services is unimaginable and we will continue to provide the full range of financial services there.

In this sense, you are absolutely correct and the groundwork that we created by building our own platform based on proprietary solutions led to the fact that, in general, we are unscathed by the vendors’ departure from the market, since 80 percent of our solutions are based on in-house IT products. In 2023, over 90 percent of the services that we use will be our proprietary services."
German Gref, CEO and Chairman of the Management Board of Sberbank, 7 March 2023

"Today, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took another major step in implementing commitments made by G7 leaders to curtail Russia’s use of the international financial system to further its war against Ukraine.

OFAC’s action includes the designation of Gazprombank, more than 50 internationally connected Russian banks, more than 40 Russian securities registrars, and 15 Russian finance officials.

OFAC is also issuing an alert describing sanctions risks related to Russia’s System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS), which the Kremlin created and uses to evade sanctions.“Today’s sanctions targeting Russia’s largest remaining non-designated bank, as well as dozens of other financial institutions and officials in Russia"
US Treaury Dept 21 November 2024

"Luxembourg-based bank GPB International SA, Hong Kong-based GPB Financial Services Hong Kong Limited, Cyprus-based GPB Financial Services Limited and GPB-DI Holdings Limited, Switzerland-based Gazprombank (Switzerland) Ltd, and South Africa-based GPB Africa and Middle East Pty Ltd are wholly owned subsidiaries of Gazprombank. 

Gazprombank is being designated pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 for operating or having operated in the financial services sector of the Russian Federation economy. GPB International SA, GPB Financial Services Hong Kong Limited, GPB Financial Services Limited, GPB-DI Holdings Limited, Gazprombank (Switzerland) Ltd, and GPB Africa and Middle East Pty Ltd are being designated pursuant to E.O. 14024 for being owned or controlled by, or for having acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, Gazprombank. All entities owned 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly, by Gazprombank or the six designated Gazprombank subsidiaries, are subject to blocking, even if not identified by OFAC.

Concurrently with this action, OFAC is issuing two new general licenses (GL) authorizing U.S. persons to wind down transactions involving Gazprombank, among other financial institutions, and to take the necessary steps to divest from debt or equity issued by Gazprombank. OFAC is also amending Russia-related GL 53 to ensure that diplomatic banking activities involving Gazprombank are not disrupted. OFAC continues to maintain a variety of authorizations, including GLs authorizing transactions related to agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, certain transactions in support of non-governmental organizations, the official business of third-country diplomatic missions located in the Russian Federation, and certain transactions and official business of certain international organizations and entities. 

SYSTEM FOR TRANSFER OF FINANCIAL MESSAGES 

OFAC is also issuing an alert underscoring the sanctions risk for foreign financial institutions that join Russia’s System for Transfer of Financial Messages (commonly known by its Russian acronym, SPFS, short for Sistema Peredachi Finansovykh Soobshcheniy).

SPFS is part of the financial services sector of the Russian Federation economy because of its role facilitating communication between financial institutions engaged in Russia’s financial system.

This means that any foreign financial institution that joins or has already joined SPFS may be designated for operating or having operated in the financial services sector of the Russian Federation economy pursuant to E.O. 14024.

Russia has used and promoted SPFS, designed as an alternative to Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) network, to maintain international financial connectivity, evade sanctions, and fund its war effort.

OFAC views joining SPFS after publication of this alert as a red flag and is prepared to more aggressively target foreign financial institutions that take such action. OFAC also urges stakeholders to review their exposure to institutions that have joined SPFS, as such banks may be conduits for Russian sanctions evasion."
US Treasury Dept 21 November 2024

Russia has developed its own 'secure' domestic smartphone, the AYYA. It is based on based on a domestic operating system (Aurora) and on the android system. It will be available in late 2022.

"Today, the only producer of fibre for telecom in the entire EAEU is Optic Fibre Systems, a company in Saransk (Mordovia). Its production capacity was increased to 4 million kilometres of fibre per year, which meets almost half of the domestic demand. To fully cover the market, the company drafted a comprehensive investment project. It will expand the company's capacity to 10 million kilometres of fiber per year, allowing it to meet the requirements of not only Russia but also other EAEU member-states. There are already agreements with the Republic of Belarus."
Denis Manturov, Minister of Industry and Trade, 15 February 2023

Russia, like most developed countries, has a 'Digital Economy' programme, with high-speed data transmission the key enabler. Russia has been late to digitise it's economy, which is fortunate because it can both modernise and fully indigenise critical infrastructure. Unlike almost every other country, it will become fully able to function in any condition of blockade or war.

It is also leveraging digital services to improve speed and efficiency of services such as healthcare (an rea in desperate need of funding and modernisation).

"Again, we still have a lot to do to ensure that every Russian, regardless of the region they live in, receives high-quality and up-to-date medical care. This is not only about better medical equipment and facilities.

Other key priorities include building up capacity to provide specialised and high-tech care, improving the education level of medical personnel, as well as the wider use of advanced information technologies, including so-called digital assistants, which help doctors make diagnoses and reduce the time spent on paperwork.

People who are not versed in the industry still find it unusual that big data systems can help in diagnosing patients. This is amazing but true, and it improves the quality of the work."
Vladimir Putin 15 February 2023

In 2021 Russia's Rostelecom started a US$650 million project (TEA NEXT) to lay a high capacity, high tech fiber-optic line right across Russia, from the west to the east, with links to major cities. While it uses Russian components, it is not clear what percent are made in Russia.

"Using the TEA NEXT infrastructure, it is planned to introduce a fundamentally new set of services to the Russian market to provide fiber-optic infrastructure and the necessary additional resources for the organization of backbone new-generation communication networks to interested clients in Russia"
Rostelecom 7 March 2024

The first stage, from the Latvian border to Torzhok (230 kms from Moscow) in Western Russia was completed in 2022. Stage 2, the 765 km line from St. Petersburg to Moscow was completed in 2024. Stage 3, the largest stage by far, from Torzhok to Kyakhta in Eastern Russia (adjacent the Mongolian border) is expected to be completed by the end of 2025/2026.

TEA NEXT as a trans-Eurasian fiber-optic line. The infrastructure will enable access to Russia's border with both China and Mongolia. The line also reaches the underwater cable terminus at the port city of Nakhodka, on the Sea of Japan. Infrastructure for international connection via submarine cables stage will probably be complete 2025-2026. TEA NEXT will be available as a resource for communications from both Asia and from Europe, as well as for Russia internal operators. It provides a backup for the existing marine cables that run from China across the Indian Ocean to Egypt. Obviously, they are strategically important, but because of their latest generation technology and capacity, they are also a cheaper alternative,

Electronics Industry

"Military and aerospace markets are the most closed both for foreign companies and private Russian designers and electronics manufacturers. However, in many cases technological inferiority of enterprises controlled by government doesn’t allow them to fulfill tasks of Defense Ministry and it makes them to get private companies as subcontractors of the second level to take part in most projects on designing and manufacturing military equipment of new generation. In this year the first precedent of direct interaction was set between private company and military customer."
Ivan Pokrovsky, Electronica Publishing House 2008

 Globally, the high-tech end of electronics manufacturing is worth $1 trillion, and it is dominated by China. Not only is it hard to compete on a global market, the area is capital intensive and crowded. The Huawei 5G wireless network debacle shows that even if you are big, cheap, and cutting edge, the 'unfriendly countries' will find a reason to block your products. (On the other hand, perhaps Huawei were simply naive.) Russia does have a prescence in manufacture and sale of 'electronica' in general, but it is rather small. In the Soviet days it was more advanced than the US, but no longer.

"...Russia's semiconductor technology was also brilliant in the former Soviet Union. At that time, the Soviet Union did not have any channels to obtain technology and equipment from the West, but it still achieved good results in the early days. With the strong support of the Soviet Union's planned economy, the gap between the Soviet Union and the United States in the semiconductor field was not large in the early days...in 1957, the world's first semiconductor company Fairchild was born in Silicon Valley, and the Soviet Union also had its own first semiconductor manufacturing plant in 1959...

Judging from the current state of the semiconductor industry in Russia, its technological accumulation in the upstream design and manufacturing of semiconductors comes from the legacy of the former Soviet Union on the one hand, and the upgrading of backward western production lines on the other hand. Products appeared, but eventually disappeared in the long history due to various reasons, and its semiconductor industry was eventually reduced to extensive sales of rare materials...

...It is difficult to cultivate world-leading products on the barren semiconductor industry soil. By October 2020, MCST announced its latest CPU - Elbrus-16C, which uses TSMC's 16nm process, which consists of 12 billion transistors. However, at this time, the mainstream CPUs on the market already use the 7nm process, and the Soc of the flagship mobile phone uses the 5nm process"
MinNews 17 August 2022

Communications equipment sales are the next biggest by value ($230 million), but make up only 10% of total sales.

Security systems are the third biggest sector by value ($215 million), but make up only 9% of sales.

Commercial equipment and medical electronics sales are fourth biggest by value at $100 million, but together make up only 4% of the market. Automotive electronics are worth $80 million in sales and make up 3% of industry sales volume. Consumer electronic segment was about the same. Industrial electronics make up 20% of sales (worth $50 million).

Total market value of electronic products in 2019 was "estimated at $2.74 billion". These figures are for 2020, via 'Expo electronica'.

However, according to the (presumably Russian) Electronics Developers and Manufacturers Association, annual sales of domestically-built 'electronica' equipment comes to $15 billion, and exports of Russian-made electronics bring in about $1 billion. "Overall, the industry’s gross income stands at $6bn". In 2007 the total Russian 'electronics' manufacturing - equipment, components and units - was valued at over $8 billion [pdf]. That was 15 years ago, $15 billion today sounds reasonable. Maybe there is a difference between 'electronica' equipment and electronics.

State-owned Rostec has taken over the scannable bar code labelling system, with great results. Rostec now produces branded product labels for 570,000 companies in Russia, and now also in 5 "allied" states. The scannable labels cover 10 products groups from tyres, tobacco, and medicines to to water, perfumes, beer and softgoods. Obviously, this list will grow over time.  All cash registers in Russia are connected to the system. Since launch in 2019 to 2022 the system collected 435 billion rubles in sales tax.

An unspecified 'number' of branches of major global manufacturers work in Russia (or at least did, in 2020).

"Amount of electronic components manufacture in Russia made up to 400 million in 2007, a quarter of which is due to export deliveries. Average annual growth for the last five years is about 10%. In 2008—2009 we expect much higher figures related with the beginning of IC manufacturing for smart cards at the new 0.18 EEPROM line at NIIME and Mikron (Sitronix) company and extension of technological potential of a number of state enterprises financed according to the national target program."
Ivan Pokrovsky, Electronica Publishing House 2008

According to Expo electronica, 36% the electronic industry are involved in either production of custom items or purchase and resale of components, 30% work in marketing and development of electronic devices, 18% specialise in development and marketing of modular components, 8% of companies are involved assembly and testing of modules and equipment, 5% are involved in 'completing production' (whatever that means), and 3% are involved in manufacturing cases for equipment. The Russian government would like to eventually replace all government PC's (and presumably servers) with Russian designs and components. Annual sales of domestically-built products were $15 billion in 2020. Only about 15% of this is due to military equipment exports (built with Russian electronic systems). The Pantsir air defense system and the Krasukha mobile electronic warfare systems would be examples.

"Russia’s state arms exporter Rosoboronexport sealed defense deals with international companies worth roughly $2.35 billion at the Army-2020 international military-technical expo held in the outskirts of Moscow. Rosoboronexport has inked contracts to deliver cutting-edge electronic warfare systems (EW), such as the Krasukha mobile EW system and the latest mobile Repellent-Patrol electronic countermeasures complex — for the first time in the history of military-technical cooperation between Russia and foreign states. ...the mobile electronic warfare system “Krasukha” protects command posts, groupings of troops, air defense systems, and vital industrial, administrative and political facilities. The Krakusha-4 system analyzes the signal type and impairs enemy radar stations by powerful jamming emissions at ranges of up to 300 kilometers (186 miles). As a result, enemy aircraft lose their capability to detect targets and aim their precision weapons against them."
Caspiannews.com 29 August 2021

The electronics/electronica industry employs 360,000 people. The Russian Ministry of Industry and Trade confirms the 'domestic civilian electronics sector' is worth $15 million.

Sales drop off in years prior to 2020 were attributed to "mainly due to a reduction in orders from the Russian military-industrial complex. Delays in financing and a lack of large-scale military projects explains the slowdown." This may have changed recently, but I suspect only to an extent. Practical military equipment needs 'sturdy' workaday processors that can survive shaking and jarring when in the active military environment. At the military workstation (and probably missile) level lower 'spec' microprocessors - which Russia produces - are more than adequate.

Russia has been shut off from 'high end' semiconductors, at least from unfriendly countries. Russia probably could quietly acquire the relatively small number of very advanced semiconductors it needs from friendly countries, but strategically, it seems more likely they have developed their own. It would be a big - but not impossible - task to start cold to reach the extremely high level of technical competence to make these very advanced chips. Small numbers of these specialist chips for limited-run advanced projects may well already be made by Russia's research institutes contracted to the Russian military industrial complex. If so, the Government is unlikely to mention it.

"In general, the semiconductor industry of the Soviet Union, whose main purpose is military industry, does not pursue the power and commercial possibilities of pure semiconductor technology. It only needs to be practical and durable enough to ensure the effectiveness of military units. From the military industry [point of view] it is said that this move [breakup] of the Soviet Union is actually not a problem. Even today, semiconductors used in the industrial and military fields are not advanced process chips, but mature ones with higher reliability and durability in various extreme environments.

For example, the temperature ranges required for normal operation of civilian chips, industrial chips and military chips are very different. Civilian grade requires 0°C~70°C, industrial grade requires -40°C~85°C, and military grade requires -55°C~125°C. This is only an indicator of temperature. Industrial and military grade chips also have anti-interference and impact resistance. Even aerospace-level radiation resistance and other requirements, these are difficult to achieve with more sophisticated and smaller advanced process chips, so even if today's Russia is almost out of the global semiconductor industry chain, it can produce [them] to a certain extent."
MinNews [slightly edited for sense] 17 August 2022

"Defense and commercial companies in Russia rely heavily on foreign-made microchips. While Russian engineers provide the design specifications, the technology is assembled by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC. Following the Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine, TSMS ceased production of Russian-designed Baikal and Elbrus microchips."
DefenseNews, 9 June 2022

"Microelectronics manufacture, particularly semiconductor one, is most attractive for investors. While establishment of modern manufacture for electronic equipment costs
several million or tens of million dollars, establishment of semiconductor manufacture needs several hundred of million or several billion dollars."
Ivan Pokrovsky, Electronica Publishing House 2008

Russia has several companies involved in production of semiconductors for one purpose or another, including paycards and the like. Mikron chips are internationally certified, and Mikron is already producing chips for the Russian automobile industry. According to one Russian social news website Mikron already produces microcircuits for automotive instrument clusters and has presumably 'generic' components "body electronics and engine management systems, driver assistance systems and lighting equipment". Mikron says it is developing, or intends to develop, around 72 kinds of microcircuits (both generic and bespoke) for Russian car manufacturers, a range which will allow 80% of electronic components to be domestically sourced.

 In April 2022 Russia announced a $38.3 billion digital transformation plan which includes $5 billion to design and manufacture its own 90-nanometer process nodes by December 2022 - and produce their own 28-nanometer node by 2030.

The Mikron Group is Russia's largest producer and exporter of microelectronics. It is based in the “Moscow Technopolis”, a special economic zone with favorable conditions for business. It is jointly controlled by Rostec and Sistema and produces products for both military and civilian purposes.

Japan finally joined in the west's trade restrictions on the sale of semiconductors to Russia in late January 2023.  Russia imported about 100 million USD of microchips in 2020. Import statistics will now cease to be visible to the west. This makes it easy to import specifically configured lower-level chips used in industry (perhaps including for some missiles) from friendly countries (possibly as very well-paid intermediaries).

"The statement did not accuse these or any of the other countries named – a diverse group that included Armenia, Georgia, China, Brazil, Israel, India, Singapore and Taiwan – of facilitating sanctions-dodging...the nations were among “certain common transshipment points through which restricted or controlled exports have been known to pass before reaching destinations in Russia or Belarus.”

“In some instances, controlled U.S. items may be legally exported to these and other jurisdictions as inputs for the production of other finished goods. However, further export to Russia or Belarus of those finished products and goods, potentially through additional transshipment points, may be prohibited,” the statement read...

...Washington imposed punitive measures on an Uzbek company over its dealings with a sanctioned Russian firm that it said 'amounted to' collusion in sanctions-dodging. Promcomplektlogistic company “has actively supported” Russian company Radioavtomatika in its “effort to evade U.S. sanctions,” the State Department said at the end of June.

Its transgressions included “providing electronic components such as microcircuits to Radioavtomatika,” which procures foreign items for Russia’s defense industry.""
eurasianet 12 July 2022

The west may cut Russia off from some specialised products, but it is impossible to cut it off from a reliable supply of all the electronic components it needs.

"At present, Russia’s electronic market accounts for 0.4% of the worldwide market, according to the EDMA.
At such a small scale, Russian companies do not have the opportunity to provide a high level of guarantees, and comprehensive offerings, customers require.
The dependence on basic foreign technologies is very high, which increases the risks associated with sanctions.

Maintaining competitiveness is also an issue. Public firms operate on a contractual basis, receiving [Government] budget financing. This deprives them of incentives to increase their production’s economic efficiency. On the other hand, private companies are forced to compete against multinational corporations, which does not allow them to develop, due to high Russian demand for foreign-manufactured products."
Expo electronica 13 January 2020

Russia has announced (April 2022) an accelerated plan to increase it's domestic digital capabilities, in line with it's strategy for it's digital economy. About $33 will be spent on the development of technologies needed for semiconductor production encourage the further development of domestic chips and local electronic modules, build out infrastructure for datacenters, develop the skills of the technical workers, and market it's own electronic products and solutions.

Russia has a relatively low level of involvement in industries producing technically advanced electronic equipment for the public. Perhaps this will slowly change. Right now, Russia is likely to focus on state-sponsored production of those electronic components and manufactures that are critical to Russia's security. In 2018 the production of "electrical equipment, electronic and optical equipment"  amounted to less than 5% of industrial output overall. Russia imported 73% of its 'electronics' and electronic components. I doubt this will change for quite a long time, particularly as there will likely be an oversupply of 'electronica' in the world.

There is increasing global competition to sell electronics and components. For example, India announced in 2021 that it would develop a semiconductor manufacturing business (it is also developing an electronic repair industry). The US is also trying to develop a domestic chip manufacturing capacity. Russia is flush with money, and is a reliable customer. The rest is predicable.

It's true that the electronics sector can be a large employer, especially if you look at it in the widest sense, including the other industries enabled by it. And this area may end up being its strength. Employment in good tech-related jobs is one of the goals of the Russian government, and Russia is very strong in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Maths education. The program to develop the tech industry is ambitious. The Russian Ministry of Industry and Trade's draft strategy for the Russian electronics sector out to 2030 includes these elements:

• Growth of domestic production by two and a half times
• Grow the value of the domestic civilian electronics sector from $15 million to $74 million.
  
• Increase the share of domestic components in microelectronics from 20% to 80%.
• Create design centres, strategic alliances, joint ventures, encourage within-industry cooperation, and develop programs to share competencies.
• Initially focus on telecommunications, navigation equipment, computer technology, automation systems, and similar.
• By 2024 include currently developing and emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (to increase demand for microprocessors, sensors and such), 5G, smart energy.
  
• In 2025 expand data centres, build software defined networks that interact with data centres, balance telecom load etc (i.e. smart telecoms).
• Drive implementation of widespread digitalisation of industry..

It is clear that Russia has a long term strategy to bring digital technology to everyone, right across the vast country. It has the vision and the money to do it.

"In 2022, 355 companies (vs 282 companies in 2021) from Russia, Austria, Armenia, Belarus, Germany, China, and Norway exhibited at ExpoElectronica and ElectronTechExpo. The trade shows were attended by 16,435 industry professionals from 20 countries and 70 regions of Russia, among which 8,151 visited for the first time. The number of visitors increased almost by 50% compared to last year. The share of visitors from Russian regions also increased by 45%...experts discussed import substitution, consolidation of the industry to overcome the sanctions, and use of domestic products."
ExpoElectronica and ElectronTechExpo 18 April 2022

"...The face recognition system: it was first used during the 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia and has been recognised as one of the best in the world. In 2021, NtechLab was recognised as the most accurate face recognition neural network in the world, especially in light of the terrorist threat. In 2022, we implemented it in 36 countries, including at the FIFA World Cup in Qatar. We are using the system in many Russian cities to ensure security. It has become easier to find criminals or missing persons, because all surveillance cameras have been equipped with the NtechLab system."
Sergei Chemezov, CEO of Rostec State Corporation, 7 August 2023

"...we can and will create additional incentives for businesses to invest in research and design, additional incentives for big and small high-tech companies. In short, we must create an investment climate that can spark a genuine technological boom. This is something we simply have to do.

Third, we must upgrade at least a half of the equipment and research infrastructure at leading research organisations. ...this must be done, and I think that we can do it. We must continue to develop mega-science projects in Russia.

...we need to create a comprehensive system for training researchers and creating conditions for the professional advancement of young researchers, so that they will have better conditions for research, for setting up research laboratories and teams, as well as for the practical application of their solutions and ideas.

Fifth, talent, competences of scientists and engineers and, of course, their social status are a key factor in technological breakthroughs. All this must develop, and their social status must increase...

No institute or any single Russian region can monopolise science. We must do our best to create attractive places for dedicated professionals, for people fascinated with the idea of a technological breakthrough, for our young researchers, for world-famous foreign scientists, including our compatriots, all over Russia.

We will continue to consolidate our federal universities and other higher education institutions and Academy institutes, and we will establish powerful research centres, including in such areas as the digital economy, the humanities, healthcare and agriculture, as well as in other sectors and disciplines.

I hope that Kurchatov Institute and the Russian Academy of Sciences will become most actively involved in this work, and that they will jointly address research tasks and achieve technological breakthroughs. The Academy and the institute have signed the relevant agreement today. I assume that all this will effectively promote the development of Russian science and that of the entire country."
Vladimir Putin 10 April 2018

In other words, the Russian science community has the same problems of attracting and retaining talent as the rest of the developed world. Patriotism alone doesn't cut it.

In September 2024 Mikhail Kovalchuk, the Head of the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, reported on research progress. He claimed that the Kurchatov Institute now has "the world’s largest materials science potential." Absolutely everything that flies has been developed at the Institute of Aviation Materials. He also mentioned a new propulsion system for spacecraft:

"...as you and I discussed some time ago, we will see that we fly into space, much like Baron Munchausen, on a cannonball. Our RD-180 engine operates for 300 seconds, providing an impulse that kick-starts a rocket, allowing us to fly along ballistic trajectories, but we are unable to adjust them. But we need to land on the Moon. We have now developed prototype engines that offer an entirely different thrust and completely new opportunities for deep-space missions. This is the first aspect.

For example, we have developed a lunar station that functions as a prototype Selena battery. We are now focusing on one thing at a time and trying to promote it as much as possible."

He also highlights a "new type of nuclear power":

"We have developed a whole new type of nuclear power. Here is the battery. We have the Yelena plant, a factory-built battery, which generates up to 1 megawatt of electricity and up to 15 megawatts of heat. These local plants do the job in the Arctic where there are no major consumers and no chance to build a grid or a major power plant."

Russia was locked out of the CERN Physics tool, so "a huge number" of Russian researchers have returned to Russia and are having to re-start research on fundamental physics using Russian resources, which, apparently, the Kurchatov Institute is "on the brink of a technological breakthrough", whatever that means.

Intellectual Property (IP)

"It remains only to adopt rules on the use of their intellectual property. Without any licenses and payment of royalties. This, among other things, will be our retaliatory sanctions on their property rights. For everything from movies to industrial software. Thanks, by the way, to those who have developed various programs for the unlicensed use of their expensive intellectual products. In short, for pirated use in the mode of personal sanctions 😄. And what, à la guerre comme à la guerre..." [note: this means something like 'all's fair in love and war',or ' in times of difficulty do your best with what is at hand'.]
Dmitry Medvedev (in his Telegram Channel January 2023)

On March 22, 2022 the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) broke off ties with both the Russian Patent Office (Rospatent) and other Eurasian Patent Offices. The US Patent Office will no longer police infringement of Russian patents in USA (or any other country). In addition, restrictions on remitting money to Russia will likely prevent American patent holders from paying Russian and Eurasian agents, and protection of US patent holders will end. If annual fees payable in Russia for IP protection aren't paid, IP protection ends.

In response to the US trade restriction, on 6 March 2022 the Russian government, under provisions for emergency measures in the Russian Civil Code, decreed that Russian companies (and individuals) can use any inventions, industrial designs without the consent of the patent holder, or paying any compensation.  The Code requires payment of “proportional” compensation, but in the case of patent owners from foreign countries which perform unfriendly actions 'in relation to Russian legal entities and individuals' will have the compensation level set at zero.

"The Presidential Executive Order says federal and regional government authorities, other government authorities, local self-government bodies, and organisations and individuals under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation shall operate on the premise that special economic measures are to be applied to certain legal entities, individuals and organisations under their control, starting on the day the Executive Order comes into force.

The document introduces a ban on government authorities at all levels, as well as organisations and individuals under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, implementing agreements (including foreign trade contracts) with legal entities, individuals and organisations under their control that are subject to the special economic measures, and on executing obligations under existing agreements (including foreign trade contracts) to individuals under the sanctions where such obligations are not satisfied or are partially satisfied.

The Executive Order also bans conducting financial operations whose beneficiaries are individuals under sanctions.

In addition, the document imposes a ban on exporting products or raw materials manufactured or extracted in Russia when they are delivered to individuals under sanctions, or by individuals under sanctions to other individuals"
Executive Order On Imposing Retaliatory Special Economic Measures in Connection with the Unfriendly Actions of Certain Foreign States and International Organisations
3 May 2022
.

"The 9^th Eastern Economic Forum, which was held in Vladivostok under your leadership, Mr President, has ended.

The forum enjoys strong interest around the world. Last year, the event brought together 6,300 participants from 62 countries; this year, as many 7,100 people from 75 countries came to participate. The countries of the Asia-Pacific region and other regions of the world were widely represented.

Among the participants were representatives of business and diplomatic corps from 16 unfriendly states. These numbers indicate the interest of the outside world in our country and Far Eastern projects.

...313 agreements worth 5.569 trillion rubles [ almost 60 billion USD, editor] were signed...which is the best result over the past years. Last year, we signed 386 investment deals totalling 3.8 trillion [rubles].

...given that about 80 percent of the signed agreements are embodied in real investment projects, the 9^th Eastern Economic Forum secured at least four trillion rubles [about 43 billion USD - editor] in investment in the Far East and the Arctic.

These agreements have rationalised our proposal to increase the 2030 target for attracting investment to 12 trillion rubles.

The largest projects signed at the forum include the construction of the Vorkuta Chemical Complex, the development of the Kun-Manie nickel-copper deposit in the Amur Region, the expansion of the Berezovskoye iron-ore deposit in the Trans-Baikal Territory, the construction of the Soyuz cross-border railway transhipment hub near the Nizhneleninskoye-Tongjiang bridge, and a marine terminal for the transhipment of liquefied hydrocarbon gases in the Khabarovsk Territory."
Yury Trutnev, Deputy Prime Minister 11 September 2024

'This Executive Order was signed to protect the national interests of the Russian Federation in response to unfriendly actions, which contradict international law, undertaken by the United States and joined by other foreign states and international organisations, aimed at introducing restrictions against Russian citizens and legal entities.

The President resolved that in light of the risk of natural disasters and man-made emergency situations endangering the life and safety of people and threatening the national interests and economic security of the Russian Federation, arising due to the violation by certain foreign entities and individuals of their obligations under the Agreement of the Development of the Piltun-Askokhskoye and Lunskoye Oil and Gas Fields on the Basis of Production Sharing, signed on June 22, 1994, special economic measures shall be applied to these foreign entities and private individuals under their jurisdiction.

In particular, the Government of the Russian Federation is to establish a Russian Limited Liability Company, which will take over the rights and obligations of Sakhalin Energy Investment Company in accordance with this Executive Order. The ownership of the company’s property, created within the framework of the above Agreement, shall be transferred forthwith to the Russian Federation.'
Russian Executive Order June 30 2022

"Americans stand to lose heavily too, as the production sharing arrangements dating back to the Yeltsin era had been forced out of Russian government when it was in dire economic straits during the transition from the Soviet period and was in no position to negotiate optimal deals. Come to think of it, something like 262 such so-called production sharing agreements (PSAs) were squeezed out of the Russian government by western oil companies by the time Yeltsin retired. 

After coming to power in 1999, President Vladimir Putin set about the mammoth task of cleaning up the Aegean stables of Russia’s foreign collaboration in the oil sector. The “decolonisation” process was excruciatingly difficult, but Putin pulled it through and got rid of as many as 260 (out of 262) PSAs. In fact, Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 are the very last remaining two PSAs harking back to post-Soviet Russia’s decade of humiliation under Yeltsin."

Any surprises why the Biden Administration hates Putin so much and wants him out of power in Moscow? "
M.K. Bhadrakumar 10 July 2022

“Sakhalin-1 is a valuable non-Middle East source for Japan, which depends on the Middle East for 90 per cent of its crude oil imports. There is no change in maintaining the interests of Japanese companies in it.”
Industry minister Koichi Hagiuda, August 2022

On the 16 July 2023 Danone Russia, a subsidiary of the French - owned Danone Agri-food company, was put in temporary Russian governmental management by Presidential decree, as was Baltika Breweries, a subsidary of the Carlsberg Group of Denmark. All foreign owned shares in the locally registered entities (which in both cases is nearly all the shares) will now be controlled and voted on by Rosimushchestvo, the Russian Federal Property Management Agency . 

Baltika Breweries is/was one of the largest breweries in Russia (and employs 8,400 people), but, under shareholder pressure, it has decided to sell its Russian  investment. This has to be approved by Russian regulators.

Danone bought Unimilk, the second largest Russian dairy products company. Unimilk had a 21% share of the Russian domestic market. Danone, which now has 13 factories, 7,200 employees, and €1.2 billion in sales in Russia (5% of Danone's global sales) said in October 2022 that it would sell its Russian business, taking a hit of up to $1 billion. But at the same time, it wanted to retain a right to buy its shares, retain 'up to' 25% of the capital of the company, and have a seat on the board. It seems to be dragging its feet on the sale, with statements it won't be sold until 2024. Presumably it is hoping for a miracle.

"...the situation in the industry has indeed gradually stabilised. All major Russian manufacturers have been increasing the load on their assembly lines. This includes AvtoVAZ, GAZ, KAMAZ, UAZ and Ural. The Tula unit of China’s Haval is also boosting production."
Deputy Prime Minister – Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov 16 November 2022

"Overall, the government has allocated about 31.5 billion rubles since the beginning of the year to encourage the demand in the automotive industry. As a result, the production of light commercial vehicles increased by 27 percent, and the production of cars by almost by 44 percent.

Today’s launch of production of the Aura cars, designed with the state support, will be a milestone for this sector.

We are not going to stop here but will expand the range of the most popular classes of cars to be built based on a single modular platform. These are the solutions that we are including in the new national project on transport mobility."
Vladimir Putin 9 October 2024

"The Governor discussed, in great detail, how the region overcame difficulties caused by sanctions against Russia.

Over the years of industrial development, the Kaluga Region built over 130 enterprises, including multiple companies with foreign capital.

The automotive cluster comprising 30 interlinked enterprises (Volkswagen, Peugeot-Citroën and Volvo) and employing 10,000 workers ground to a halt.

Regional authorities teamed up with the Russian Government to search for partners. Russian investors now own all these enterprises that have been operating since mid-2024. The region manufactured 13,000 motor vehicles throughout 2024.

This year, the former Volkswagen plant will manufacture over 110,000 cars. The former Peugeot-Citroen plant will manufacture 25,000 HAVAL cars under a knockdown assembly contract. The region is reinstating previous performance indicators. Many foreigners remained in the Kaluga Region and continue to expand their production facilities.

The head of the region noted that, although the automotive industry used to account for 40 percent of industrial output, it became possible to reach pre-crisis industrial production levels last year."
Presidential Meeting with Kaluga Region Governor Vladislav Shapsha, 11 February 2025

"Should the executives at Gazprom Germania “carry out the procedure of the voluntary liquidation” as ordained, the long-term gas contract held by German companies with the German subsidiary as their partner was at risk.

These long-term contracts are highly lucrative, as they were agreed upon before the record spike in gas prices and are usually hedged against massive price swings to allow for stable business planning.

As per German law, any transfer of ownership in “critical” infrastructure requires the go-ahead of Habeck’s ministry, which was not given. Fearful of additional attempts to interfere with the subsidiary, the German government did something it had never done before.

“I’ve lived to see Germany nationalise Russian companies operating in Deutschland, what a time to be alive,” commented legal scholar Jakub Jaraczweski.

Gazprom Germania will be steered by the federal network agency until 30 September 2022, although the government has yet to comment on what will be done with the subsidiary of the Russian state company afterwards."
Euractiv.com 5 April 2022

"Will there be any political decisions that run counter to contract clauses? We will ignore them and suspend deliveries if these decisions are inconsistent with our interests, our economic interests in this case. We will then stop supplying gas, oil, coal, or fuel oil, suspend all our deliveries and fully comply with our contractual obligations. Notably, the people who are trying to impose things on us are not in a position to dictate their will to us. Let them come to their senses."
Vladimir Putin 7 September 2022

 through the Polish port of Gdansk, from where oil is pumped through Poland using the westernmost segment of the Druzhba, and from Kazakhstan in transit through the Russian territory on the same Druzhba.

Germany strongly emphasizes its desire to increase oil purchases in Kazakhstan, cooperation with which is becoming more intensive. However, there are fears that in the event of the nationalization of Rosneft’s German assets, Moscow will block the Druzhba oil pipeline as a retaliatory measure and thereby [stop] the supply of Kazakh oil.

But now the Polish side has assured Berlin, according to a Reuters source, that in this event it will introduce oil currently being pumped through its territory towards Sweden to 2.5 million [metric] tons per year,  and thereby fully compensate for supplies from Kazakhstan. Their volume, according to the agency, now ranges from 1.0 to 1.2 million tons. So far, about 1.2 million tons of products purchased on the world market are passing through Gdansk. Theoretically, it could also be oil from Kazakhstan. At the same time, Warsaw made it clear to the German side that as long as Rosneft remains the main co-owner of PCK Raffinerie Schwedt, even if it is formal in terms of external management, there will be no increase in supplies through Gdansk.

"We are the largest North American producer by volume in the rail and large diameter pipe markets. We also hold leading positions in the West Coast plate as well as the Western Canada oil country tubular goods and small diameter pipe markets.

Our diverse range of manufacturing capabilities allows us to produce a wide array of specialty steel products: plate, coiled plate, welded and seamless pipe for oil and gas applications, rail and wire rod and bar. We take a dynamic approach to manufacturing, using the geographic accessibility and production flexibility of our facilities to respond quickly to changes in the market for maximum efficiency and cost savings. Our Product Technology Centers in Pueblo and Portland and our Research and Development complex in Regina enhance our ability to develop high strength steel products for the most demanding applications."
Evraz North America

"ENA [Evraz North America] will be the first North American line pipe producer qualified for high-pressure, 100 percent hydrogen pipeline transportation.
Testing is being conducted at a RINA-CSM S.p.A, a leading independent European research center specializing in hydrogen and fracture mechanics. All pipe samples are produced in Regina, Saskatchewan and made from steel at ENA Regina Steel, the Company’s EAF-based steel mill.
Hydrogen is a core component of ENA’s alternative energy strategy, which also includes carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) and geothermal energy."
Evraz, 11 July 2022

"Russia’s technological achievements, primarily in the exploration of deep space, could become our considerable contribution to international programmes. We are open to such cooperation, and we are ready to implement joint projects. We will certainly discuss the format of such cooperation with our partners in the other space powers."
Vladimir Putin 16 April 2025

"The sector is facing a difficult situation, and the main task of my colleagues and myself is to increase, rather than reduce, specific standards. We need to provide the Russian economy with essential space services, in the first place. This includes navigation, communications, data transmission, meteorological and geodetic information, etc. These are the services that are in greatest demand today, and it is impossible to imagine our everyday life without them."
Yury Borisov, Director General of the Roscosmos State Corporation 26 July 2022

"Angara-A5M launch vehicle in 2028, General Designer of the Energia Rocket and Space Corporation Vladimir Solovyov said.

"If the decision to build it [a space station] is made before the end of the year, the first stage will begin in 2028 with the launch of the Research and Power Module by the Angara-A5M carrier rocket... The interlinked node and airlock modules will be launched by the Angara-A5M launch vehicle from the Vostochny [Cosmodrome]," Solovyov said in an interview with the Russian Space magazine, an official publication of the Roscosmos state corporation.

The module will have to be "retrofitted with various systems, including a gyrodyne block, to be able to use it for several years as the main module," he said.

After that, a basic unit should arrive at the station, making it possible for the station to have four cabins and two toilets, Solovyov said."
Interfax 26 July 2022

"Another important area is Russia’s nuclear space power capability. The national project must enable real progress in this field. I am referring to the development of electric propulsion systems and other technologies required for autonomous operation on various space objects.

...all major spacefaring nations are actively working on these subjects in practical terms. Let me add that nuclear power units developed by Soviet scientists have already been operated in orbit. And today, with the development of advanced materials and new technologies, we now have fundamentally new and expanded opportunities to implement such complex projects.

Russia’s undisputed leadership in this area must continue to grow. In this context, I suggest that we discuss today the core parameters for developing a space system equipped with a specialised power station, along with the so-called space tug, a transport and energy module based on a nuclear-powered propulsion system. These are large-scale initiatives being carried out with the leading involvement of Roscosmos, Rosatom, and the Kurchatov Institute."
Vladimir Putin 16 April 2025 

"... the head of the Russian space program has demanded that the British government divest its shares in OneWeb and that the broadband satellite operator not provide services to foreign militaries in order to launch a new batch of spacecraft...In November 2021 OneWeb and Intelsat revealed that they had demonstrated the constellation’s capabilities to representatives of the U.S. Army and Department of Defense."
Parabolic Arc 2 March 2022

"On March 4, Rogozin ordered a stop to preparations for the launch of a Soyuz-2.1b rocket carrying OneWeb satellites from the Baikonur Cosmodrome. The decision was made because "OneWeb has disobeyed our lawful demand to provide necessary information as to whether or not the system will be used for military purposes for the benefit of the Pentagon and military agencies of NATO member states."
Interfax 13 April 2022

"...all installation and launch preparations to be completed by the end of the year, as set forth in your executive order."
Yury Borisov, Director General of Roscosmos State Space Corporation, 19 January 2023  

"We are entirely clear on how to proceed. The main conclusion is not to rely in our plans on the West as a negotiating partner. It has proved ...it is ready to violate its own principles and resort to outright theft and robbery. The sanctity of private property and the presumption of innocence...have been upended and crudely violated.

We have already made our conclusions. We will rely only on ourselves and our trustworthy partners, the overwhelming majority of which are not part of the former “golden billion.”

We have enough buyers of our energy resources. We will work with them. Let the West pay much more than it paid to the Russian Federation and let them explain to their own people why they have to be made poorer."
Sergey Lavrov 11 May 2022

"At the peak of Russian energy supplies to Europe not a single Western analyst was trying to scare Russia about its dependence on the EU. Just the other way round, the US warned Europe against hydrocarbon supplies from our country in a bid to replace them with its own shale oil and gas. Now that we are re-orienting our exports to Asia, they suddenly decided to take care of us and give us a “friendly” reminder about potential dependence on China.

Thanks for the advice, but we will use our own judgment and rely solely on national interests and our reliable Chinese friends who are tested by time and real-life actions.

Over the past two years, bilateral trade was growing by a third annually and reached a new record-high level of $185 billion in 2022. We supply each other, on a mutually beneficial basis, with the products that our countries need. Importantly, over half of the settlements between our countries are denominated in national currencies. Our cooperation is not limited to trade, but covers a very wide range from energy and industry to agriculture and space exploration.

We have developed a relationship of positive interdependence with China in trade and economic ties, and this outcome of our work cannot but satisfy us."
Sergey Lavrov 4 April 2023

"Vladimir Putin: The West is afraid of a strong China more than it fears a strong Russia because Russia has 150 million people, and China has a 1.5 billion population, and its economy is growing by leaps and bounds — over five percent a year, it used to be even more. But that's enough for China.

As Bismark once put it, potentials are most important. China's potential is enormous — it is the biggest economy in the world today in terms of purchasing power parity and the size of the economy. It has already overtaken the United States, quite a long time ago, and it is growing at a rapid clip.

Tucker Carlson: I think that is a fair assessment. The question is what comes next? And maybe you trade one colonial power for another, much less sentimental and forgiving colonial power? Is the BRICS, for example, in danger of being completely dominated by the Chinese economy? In a way that is not good for their sovereignty. Do you worry about that?

Vladimir Putin: We have heard those boogeyman stories before. It is a boogeyman story. We are neighbours with China. You cannot choose neighbours, just as you cannot choose close relatives. We share a border of 1000 kilometers with them. This is number one.

Second, we have a centuries-long history of coexistence, we are used to it.

Third, China's foreign policy philosophy is not aggressive, its idea is to always look for compromise, and we can see that.

The next point is as follows. We are always told the same boogeyman story, and here it goes again, though in a euphemistic form, but it is still the same bogeyman story: the cooperation with China keeps increasing. The pace at which China's cooperation with Europe is growing is higher and greater than that of the growth of Chinese-Russian cooperation. Ask Europeans: aren’t they afraid? They might be, I do not know, but they are still trying to access China's market at all costs, especially now that they are facing economic problems. Chinese businesses are also exploring the European market.

Do Chinese businesses have small presence in the United States? Yes, the political decisions are such that they are trying to limit their cooperation with China.

It is to your own detriment, Mr Tucker, that you are limiting cooperation with China, you are hurting yourself. It is a delicate matter, and there are no silver bullet solutions, just as it is with the dollar....

...We, together with my colleague and friend President Xi Jinping, set a goal to reach 200 billion dollars of mutual trade with China this year. We have exceeded this level. According to our figures, our bilateral trade with China totals already 230 billion, and the Chinese statistics says it is 240 billion dollars.

One more important thing: our trade is well-balanced, mutually complementary in high-tech, energy, scientific research and development. It is very balanced.

As for BRICS, where Russia took over the presidency this year, the BRICS countries are, by and large, developing very rapidly.

Look, if memory serves me right, back in 1992, the share of the G7 countries in the world economy amounted to 47 per cent, whereas in 2022 it was down to, I think, a little over 30 per cent. The BRICS countries accounted for only 16 per cent in 1992, but now their share is greater than that of the G7.

It has nothing to do with the events in Ukraine. This is due to the trends of global development and world economy that I mentioned just now, and this is inevitable. This will keep happening, it is like the rise of the sun — you cannot prevent the sun from rising, you have to adapt to it. How do the United States adapt? With the help of force: sanctions, pressure, bombings, and use of armed forces. This is about self-conceit. Your political establishment does not understand that the world is changing ..."
Vladimir Putin 9 February 2024

"Yerlan Syzdykov: My name is Yerlan Syzdykov. I represent Amundi Asset Management, the world’s largest manager of ESG and sustainable development assets and the largest European asset manager.

Mr President, in the recent past, Russia has been building stronger ties to China as Western sanctions intensified. As the West designated now, China is a key strategic competitor, and some voices in the West are calling for so-called 'reverse Nixon policies' towards Russia. Will Russia respond and rebalance its relationship with the West and China?

Vladimir Putin: I have been intimidated by China [warned by the west not to cooperate with China - Ed] since 2000. Since that time, those who were intimidating me have got frightened themselves and started changing their China policy.

In my opinion, it [Russia's relations with China - Ed] has already changed – hence, the sanctions and different types of restrictions that seem to me to be unjustified through and through and in conflict – in this case I mean in respect of China – with international law...

...As for China’s growing might...it is chiefly economic might. Why then must we be guided by third countries’ interests in shaping our policy? We have always been guided, and will be in the future, exclusively by the interests of the people of the Russian Federation – Russia’s interests. At the same time, we always have respect for the interests of our partners in the international arena and appreciate reciprocity. Incidentally, China, in response, is treating us the same way.

So, as for economic relations, there is an implication in your question: are we not thinking of scaling down cooperation with China, something the United States is urging its European partners to do?

Look, last year, in 2020, trade between the US and China grew by 8 percent, while trade between Russia and China by 6.7 percent. Why are they calling on others to curtail relations while they themselves are doing the opposite?

First, we will be guided by our interests.

Second, we hear the United States call on its European partners to curtail relations with China. But last year, China became the EU’s top trading partner, having outstripped the United States. It is a natural process, which cannot be halted.

So, one should simply be guided by these considerations and, based on them, shape one’s policy.

Our trade with China is growing. Last year, it reached US$104 billion. In the near future, in the next couple of years, we plan to bring it to US$200 billion. Generally speaking, that is a good figure for our trade with China but still it is a far cry from what the United States or Europe have with China."
Vladimir Putin 30 November 2021

"China is our biggest trade and economic partner among foreign countries, with more than $100 billion in mutual trade.

And that does not include major projects related to oil, gas, aviation, machine engineering, nuclear energy and other industries.

But in today’s conditions, small and medium-sized businesses have many opportunities to join a great variety of projects, on both sides."
Vladimir Putin April 20, 2022

"...it is highly important that we incentivise Russian companies to enter markets offering value-added goods and to expand non-resource non-energy exports, including deliveries of goods from the machine-building sector, food and so on.

I would like to note that, in 2021–2023, Russia increased its non-resource non-energy exports more than four-fold. Four-fold, not just a few percent, is a commendable result, the growth from US$36 billion to US$148 billion. Of course, this is not the limit for us; in reality, this volume is not that high.

In the first seven months of 2024, non-resource non-energy exports continued to grow, gaining five percent and reaching US$89.8 billion.

Russia already ranks among the leading global exporters in certain sectors, including food deliveries. Of course, this result has been primarily facilitated by specialists and staffs of enterprises, as well as development institutions, regional leaders and federal agencies supporting them.

In my Address to the Federal Assembly, and later in the Executive Order on national development goals, I set a benchmark. By 2030, non-resource non-energy exports must increase by at least two thirds compared to 2023. This is an ambitious objective, especially considering the challenges our companies have been facing lately."
Vladimir Putin 25 September 2024

"It is clear that all kinds of restrictions imposed at the height of the anti-Russia frenzy have led to spikes in energy prices and have destroyed the existing logistics chains, which has affected the economy and foreign trade of regional countries. The situation is completely different in those regional states which opted to maintain normal relations with Russia and refused to join the sanctions war, despite unprecedented pressure by Western countries.

Positive dynamics was reported in the first quarter of 2022 in Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia (GDP growth over 5 percent) and the Philippines (over 8 percent). Cambodia expects to report similar yearend figures in 2022. Export-import transactions went up in Indonesia (38 percent), Malaysia (23 percent) and Vietnam (15.6 percent).

We have taken notice of our ASEAN partners’ growing interest in Russian oil, fertilisers and food. Statistics show that Russian exports to these countries have grown in January-March 2022. For example, our exports to Vietnam reached $971 million (up 48.2 percent year on year).

The delivery of our chemical and foods products to Thailand has increased by 54 percent and 185 percent, respectively. We can report an increase of bilateral trade with Indonesia (up 89 percent), Malaysia (up 38.5 percent), Myanmar (up 128 percent) and Laos (up 50 percent). Draw your own conclusions.
Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova 8 June 2022

"Last year alone, we opened five new offices in Latin America, South-East Asia, Africa and the Middle East. In total, we are now represented in 78 countries."
Denis Manturov, Minister of Industry and Trade 3 August 2023

"The share of BRICS countries in global GDP has already exceeded the same indicator for the G7, and counting. This trend is gaining traction and will continue. Just for reference, and I myself was curious to discover these statistics, here is what the G7 represented back in 1992 – its countries accounted for 45.5 percent of global GDP. However, in 2022, its share was down to 30.5 percent. Therefore, its share declined from 45.5 percent to 30 percent and is expected to be 27.9 percent in 2028.

But what about the BRICS countries? BRICS, without taking into consideration its newcomers, accounted for 16.7 percent of global GDP in 1992, but in 2022 this share reached 31.4 percent, and is expected to reach 33.8 percent in 2028. This trend is real and it will not go away. It is an objective process that has nothing to do with any momentary considerations or even conflicts, including the one we all have on our minds. Once we include the new BRICS participants, this changes everything, bringing the 2028 forecast to 38 percent of global GDP.

This means that we are witnessing the emergence of forward-looking markets based on solid, strategic partnerships and the notion of integrating economic capabilities and promoting mutually reinforcing growth.

It is important not only to understand these trends but also to enjoy the advantages and export opportunities that are emerging for our businesses and enterprises. It is necessary to assist them at all levels."
Vladimir Putin 25 September 2024

"The Eurasian Union will soon be 10 years old. Over this period, the scale of trade has almost doubled and the aggregate GDP of the EAEU countries has grown from US$1.6 trillion to US$2.5 trillion.

We have created deep common markets of goods, services, capital, and workforce, which are operating in line with agreed-upon rules.

The main point is that the Eurasian Union has become an authoritative international integration association with an efficient structure and a good foundation."
Vladimir Putin 25 December 2023

"True, there have been some good shifts [authors note - in international cooperation against covid]. One of them is the United States’ return to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Some hotheads in Washington believe that, now that they have returned, they will make others do their bidding.

There are fewer than 50 Chinese people in the WHO Secretariat, 25 Russians, over 200 Americans, and more than 2,000 NATO representatives. The past US administration said China was manipulating the WHO. That is not true. Otherwise, we are admitting the complete helplessness of 2,000 NATO members who should be the majority in the WHO Secretariat.

Nevertheless, there are some positive results though. This problem has been recently considered at the UN General Assembly and the Security Council. It is important now to focus on equitable collaboration within the WHO. Besides the attempts at carrying out “soft coups” and establishing their own rules in the organisation, hardly based on consensus, an idea has been suggested to move the main decision-making on global health policies outside the universal organisation."
Sergey Lavrov 19 Feb 2021

"April 1, 2022, '“Sputnik nasal vaccine, world’s 1st registered СOVID vaccine in nasal form, is especially effective vs. highly transmissible Omicron & other emerging variants not only in terms of protection from infection but alsо at preventing transmission." According to the document published on the state register of medicines, the nasal spray version of the Sputnik V vaccine is to be applied in two doses according to the document published on the state register of medicines, reported CNA on October 13, 2021."
Precisionvaccinations.com April 26 2022

"I would like to emphasise that only domestic parts and components were used in creating the Sarmat missile. This will, of course, facilitate its production by defence industry enterprises and expedite its use in the Strategic Missile Forces."
Vladimir Putin, April 18 2022

"Just now during my conversation with your executives, one of them said, “We feel more stable when we stand on our own two feet, two supports. And the second one is civilian equipment.” Yes, the task is to reach 30 percent – 30 percent of what defence companies produce should be civilian. In 2021, the figure was 27 percent, which is close to the goal of 30 percent

Probably, now the share of combat equipment is growing but our requirements are also on the rise. However, we will resolve this task of producing civilian equipment gradually. There will be military orders, while also growing the civilian side."
Vladimir Putin 18 January 2023

The Motor Sich manufacturing factory in Zaporizhzhia Ukraine makes engines (turbo-prop, turbo-fan and turbo-shaft) for drones, airplanes, helicopter engines (including engines for several of Russia's military helicopters), and marine gas engines, among other things. It's main market was Russia, but that ended after the coup in Ukraine in 2014.

As a result, Ukraine looked for new markets and more capital and found some of what they wanted in China's partly state-owned Skyrizon Aviation. Skyrizon bought a 41% share in Motor Sich in 2017, with 250 million of new capital to be injected, and an assembly and servicing plant in China to be opened. USA then 'sanctioned' Motor Sich company, resulting in the capital injection and China facility being scotched. Some bizarre dodgy share-issue dealings by Ukraine almost gave Skyrizon a controlling shareholding. This was blocked by the Ukraine government.  Ukraine announced in March 2021 that it intended to unilaterally nationalise Motor Sich and 'compensate' the China-based shareholders. Skyrizon Aviation placed a suit against the Ukrainian government for 4.5 billion at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague. In the meantime, Ukraine explored Turkiyes interest in buying a 50% stake in Motor Sich.

"High-precision long-range air- and sea-based missiles in Zaporozhye have destroyed the production facilities of Motor Sich plant, which produced aircraft engines for combat aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force, including UAVs"
Russia Ministry of Defense, 26 May 2022

Russia's strike ended production of the Al-450 turbo-prop engine used in the Turkish Baykar Bayraktar drone, currently in use by Ukraine against Russian forces (assisting the two newly independant Republics to remove Ukrainian forces from their territory). The AI-450 engine cost about $250,000 USD. (Russia has destroyed a number of Baykar Bayraktar drones entering Donesk and Lughansk, and also destroyed facilities storing these drones.

"Our main civilian projects are first, civilian aircraft. We pay a great deal of attention to this. In accordance with the programme that you emdorsed, we must produce over 500 aircraft of various types before 2030, including 270 MS-21 airliners, 142 Superjet-100 planes and 115 Tu-214s

We currently have 18 MS-21 aircraft in various stages of completion; in 2024, we will establish serial production and transfer six planes to Aeroflot. We need to increase output gradually, and by 2029 manufacture up to 72 planes a year...

...the Supejet-100 [engine] is already complete, the table inspections are finished, testing in a testbed aircraft complete, and soon we will begin certification flights, with the engine installed on the plane. We need to transfer 20 of them in 2024 to the airlines, and we will manufacture 20 of these planes per year....

...many countries build aircraft, but only five manufacture engines, the United States, Canada, Great Britain, France and Russia.

To give you an example, it took Pratt & Whitney, an American company, 15 years to build an engine for the Airbus 320. We started designing our PD-8 in 2017 and completed it in 2023, that is, in six years.

Probably, no one has ever accomplished this in such a record-breaking short time. We owe this success to our scientists, engineers and designers."
Sergei Chemezov, CEO Rostec, 28 December 2023

"According to objective laws governing the economy, it is obvious that in this ongoing sanctions frenzy, if I may say so, the European Union and its people will inevitably face consequences that will be hard to reverse. The same applies to the world’s poorest countries, which are already at risk of hunger.

Let me emphasise that full responsibility for all this lies squarely with the Western elites, who are ready to sacrifice the rest of the world for the sake of preserving their global dominance."
Vladimir Putin, 12 May 2022

"The euro and dollar exchange rates for the first time in 20 years caught up. Predictions about the onset of a systemic crisis in the euro area are beginning to come true.
First, the EU members shot themselves in the head with a sanctions pistol. Now they are reaping the bitter fruits of a decline in production, supercritical food inflation, the loss of competitiveness of their goods and the expectation of winter in ice dwellings without our gas.
In global terms, this is confirmation of the extremely ill-conceived nature of the sanctions against Russia. Sanctions don't work. Sanctions are harmful to the Europeans themselves. The euro is weakening."
Dmitry Medvedev deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council 12 July 2022

"Today's exports bans are worth €10 billion and target areas in which Russia is vulnerable, e.g. quantum computers and advanced semiconductors. This will degrade Russia's technological base and industrial capacity and prospects (beyond purely military) in the medium term."
EU press release (8 April 2022)

Today's import bans are worth €5.5 billion and will cut revenue streams for Russia and its oligarchs, on products from wood to cement, from seafood (e.g. caviar) to liquor (e.g. vodka). In addition, loopholes between Russia and Belarus have been closed as far as possible by mirroring the import bans in place for Belarus, as well as aligning – where feasible – our restrictions and import bans with those of our partners, notably the UK and the US."

"Incidentally, the global crisis is largely caused by these sanctions. Those who conceived them proceeded from short-sighted, exaggerated political ambitions and Russophobia, at the expense of their own national interests, their own economies and the wellbeing of their people, as primarily demonstrated by the rising inflation in Europe. In some countries, the annual rate of inflation is approaching 20%, while prices in the eurozone increased by over 11%, on average."
Vladimir Putin, 12 May 2022

"Recent events have laid bare the extent to which critical supplies depend on stable global conditions… In response, governments are legislating to increase supply security, notably through the Inflation Reduction Act in the US and the strategic autonomy agenda in Europe. But that could, in turn, accelerate fragmentation as firms also adjust in anticipation. Indeed, in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the share of global firms planning to regionalise their supply chain almost doubled --to around 45%-- compared with a year earlier. This “new global map”… is likely to have first-order implications for central banks.

One recent study based on data since 1900 finds that geopolitical risks led to high inflation, lower economic activity and a fall in international trade… ECB analysis suggests similar outcomes may be expected for the future. If global value chains fragment along geopolitical lines, the increase in the global level of consumer prices could range between around 5% in the short run and roughly 1% in the long run."
Christine Lagarde, ECB President, 18 April 2023

" Russia has already suspended gas supplies to Poland, Bulgaria, Finland, the Netherlands, Denmark and to some extent Germany because they refused to comply with the new payment system."
Interfax, 2 June 2022

"Expectations by some EU countries that LNG would quickly substitute Russian pipeline gas are self-deceptive. Global LNG demand will exceed supply in 2022 (436 million tonnes vs. 410 million tonnes), new projects will not become operational until 2024, while current infrastructure will be unable to ramp up production by more than 10.6 million tonnes (15 billion cubic meters) per annum."
Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs 9 June 2022

"The spike in gas prices was also driven by the systemic strategic mistakes of the European Commission, which has pursued the irrational policy of abandoning long-term gas contracts in favour of spot contracts (in September 2021 the price per 1,000 cubic meter exceeded USD 1,000 and reached the record high of USD 3,600 in March). Meanwhile, according to experts, Russian pipeline gas in Q1 2022 would have been 40% cheaper for Europeans than spot prices. It is important to note, that, in line with the EU energy model, whatever the buying price of Russian gas, EU companies sell it to downstream to power generators and companies (and therefore to citizens) at spot prices, making super-profits. As a result, generating companies go bankrupt, energy shortages are preprogrammed, and, consequently, prices for regular consumers grow. Yet the EU authorities fail to explain this to citizens."
Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union 3 June 2022


"...we are proposing today to tighten our hard-hitting EU sanctions against the Kremlin, enforce them more effectively and extend them until January 2023. Moscow must continue to pay a high price for its aggression.”
Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission 15 July 2022

"The much higher energy costs in Europe are putting its industries at a disadvantage compared to the U.S., Asia, or the Middle East.

For example, the current Dutch hub price is almost five times higher than the benchmark U.S. natural gas price at Henry Hub. The highest spot-based electricity prices in Europe since February 2023 threaten industrial production in key economies and loom large over business sentiment."
Oilprice.com 6 December 2024

On January 1, 2025, Ukraine went ahead with its threat to end Russian gas transit at the expiry of the transit contract. Gazprom closed the pipeline at 0800 hours (Moscow time) on that day.

"Due to the repeated and clear refusal of the Ukrainian side to extend these agreements, Gazprom was deprived of the technical and legal opportunity to supply gas for transit through Ukraine starting from January 1, 2025.”
 Gazprom Press release 1 January 2025

"From the early days of gas supplies to Europe in the 1960s the USSR and, subsequently, the Russian Federation proceeded from the premise that energy cooperation should never become contaminated with politics. Following the escalation of anti-Russian rhetoric in some EU quarters in the 2000s we repeatedly urged the EU to refrain from politicizing energy cooperation, highlighting the mutually beneficial nature of this partnership which brings our economies closer and enhances security in Europe.

Heeding calls by the EU and seeking to increase mutually beneficial cooperation with our Western neighbours, Russia has over the past decades embarked on new domestic oil and gas projects while constructing pipelines for carrying these products to Europe. To this end the EU-Russia Energy Dialogue was inaugurated in 2000 and its internal well-developed composition established. The “EU-Russia Energy Cooperation until 2050” roadmap was adopted in 2013. Work was ongoing to ensure the convergence of energy standards and discuss the feasibility of coordinating energy strategies
.
Even in the course of gas “conflicts” between Russia and Ukraine in 2005-2006, 2008-2009 and after 2014 Russia invariably demonstrated its reliability and guaranteed an uninterrupted energy supply in accordance with its obligations. At the Gas Exporting Countries Forum in Doha in February 2022 the Russian side reaffirmed its commitment to continue exporting natural gas to international markets, including to Europe.

By disseminating baseless claims about Russia’s supposed plans to terminate hydrocarbon supplies to EU, our adversaries in the EU and across the ocean seek to pull Russia away from Europe, sever the ties that bind us, even in spite of the enormous damage this will cause to EU economies and its citizens. Unfounded allegations that Moscow is using energy supplies for political aims are part and parcel of the fact-twisting information warfare unleashed by the EU and the US, the latter seeking to increase its LNG exports to the EU.

There are simply no alternatives to Russian energy resources in the European market in the short term. Should their supplies be restricted, immense difficulties for the EU’s economy and citizens will follow. Some EU capitals are well aware of the fact. Hence, amidst public calls to renounce Russian energy resources, some countries are in fact increasing natural gas shipments from Russia to fill their underground storage facilities.

Thus, it is the EU which, by imposing or planning to impose further unilateral sanctions against Russian energy supplies, is politicizing the energy sphere, attempting to use interdependences between energy consumers and suppliers as an instrument of political pressure, while damaging its own economy and the well-being of its citizens and aggravating what is already a precarious situation in the global energy markets."
Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union 3 June 2022

"Nor should we forget that Europe is now doing more than the United States. President of France Emmanuel Macron flew to Washington to try to convince US President Joe Biden to make concessions to Europe during the implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act that creates unprecedented advantages for US-based industrial companies. The French Minister of the Economy has repeatedly noted the fact that [US] industrial enterprises pay four times less for gas than their French partners. This act promotes the deindustrialisation of Europe because industrial companies will rush to obtain subsidies and more privileged terms in the United States."
Sergey Lavrov December 7 2022

"In June 2018, the leadership of these countries adopted an entirely politicised decision to withdraw from the BRELL (Belarus, Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) energy ring and interconnect with the European energy system. Over this period, a series of technical measures were implemented, culminating on February 8, 2024, in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia disconnecting from parallel and synchronous operation with the Russian energy system. This was accompanied by a pompous ceremony in the Lithuanian capital, attended by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the heads of the Baltic states.

What do we observe today? As a result of this decoupling from the Russian energy system, wholesale electricity prices on the Nord Pool exchange in the Baltic states have effectively doubled compared to pre-disconnection levels. Whereas prices previously stood at approximately €100 per megawatt, the average over the past ten days has reached €200, peaking at €270 on certain days.

Thus, residents of these three countries – Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia – are now paying twice as much for electricity following their disconnection from the Russian grid. We believe this may not yet be the ceiling, given the limited transmission capacity with adjacent energy systems in Sweden, Poland, and Finland – the systems to which they have now reconnected.

Moreover, recent reports confirm that Estonia’s largest pulp and paper mill has ceased operations due to high energy costs post-disconnection. Regarding this decision by the Baltic states, it is their sovereign affair; their consumers bear the financial consequences.
Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation, Alexander Novak, 18 February 2025 

'Siemens Energy has withdrawn its services and maintenance support for Russia in order to comply with Western sanctions ..Siemens Energy said in a statement to Reuters that the turbines were manufactured in Canada and need to be returned regularly for maintenance. One of the turbines is currently being overhauled in Montreal, Siemens Energy added.

“Due to the sanctions imposed by Canada, it is currently impossible for Siemens Energy to deliver overhauled gas turbines to the customer ......Russian technical compliance watchdog Rostekhnadzor ordered the facility to idle several turbines in Portovaya because of “technical faults and the expiry of overhaul deadlines”, according to Gazprom.'
Upstream online 15 June 2022

"the Association of German Chambers of Commerce and Industry (DIHK) said on Monday. "A total of 16% of industrial companies are forced to respond to the current energy situation by reducing production or partially abandoning some areas"...energy-intensive businesses, where readings are twice as high as the average across industry, are hit particularly hard, with a total of 32% of energy-intensive companies forced to cut all or part of their production...many companies had yet to purchase significant volumes of gas for the current year, and only half had already covered their needs through contracts.
Sputnik 25 July 2022

"Actions by Kiev authorities are the only obstacle in the way of commercial vessels entering and departing from Black Sea ports of Ukraine. Upon Kiev’s decision approximately 420 naval mines of an outdated design have been placed in the basin of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. Due their technical inadequacy these mines are coming off of their anchors (cables) and are thus putting all vessels of the Black Sea states at risk. The Ukrainian origin of the naval mines has been confirmed, their precise location is unknown. Earlier some of these mines were cleared near the coast of Romania and Turkiye. These explosive devices are frequently uncovered near the coastal strip of the Odessa region....

...maritime corridors are being opened on a daily basis from 08.00 to 19.00 (Moscow time) in the Sea of Azov (length 115 miles, width 2 miles) and the Black Sea (length 139 miles, width 3 miles).Their coordinates and details have been widely circulated among the international community. In the Mariupol area this corridor is fully operational.

In the Odessa region it is the responsibility of the Ukrainian side to ensure the safety of vessels leaving ports and proceeding to the assembly area. Kiev avoids liaising with representatives of foreign states to which the vessels belong in order to ensure their safe passage to the assembly area.

The humanitarian corridor in the Black Sea has been open since 27 March 2022"
Russian Foreign Ministry press release 3 June 2022



"Currently, the Joint Coordination Centre (JCC) in Istanbul is indeed experiencing difficulties with registering new vessels and conducting inspections. They arise solely as a result of actions by Ukrainian representatives as well as UN officials who are apparently unwilling or unable to stand up to them.

Having finally discarded not only humanitarian considerations, but even elementary human decency, they are striving to make the most out of the Black Sea Initiative stooping to anything from outright abuse of the rules of procedure to demanding bribes from the ship owners, doing all of the above for the sake of maximising commercial profits.

As a result of these actions, the share of recipients of Ukrainian food in poor countries has fallen to the lowest level (out of 28.3 million tonnes of exported grain, those countries received only 742,000, or 2.6 percent).

The owners of incoming ships who refused to pay a bribe are forced to wait for registration for many months. Outgoing dry cargo ships that have paid also have to wait for the inspection, because once they receive the money the Ukrainians lose interest in them.

This situation stems from the fact that in line with the current practices (importantly, not the rules of procedure), the process for obtaining applications for registration under the Black Sea Initiative is in the hands of the Ukrainians, while the UN is in charge of the inspection plans (for the entry and exit of ships).

Under these circumstances, the registration of ships, which Russian experts carry out strictly within the approved rules of procedure and their respective powers, is the only way to restore order to some extent and to build a fair and transparent basis for participating in the initiative.

However, our proposal to add to the registration lists the ships which will then sail to the countries in need, in particular Africa, as well as those that have been waiting in line for more than one month, was met with hostility by Ukrainian representatives. Kiev was not ready to jeopardise its commercial corruption schemes.

As a result, the Ukrainians first blocked the registration process having disagreed with our proposals, and then suspended all inspections, including inspections of outgoing ships (27 ships with 1.2 million tonnes of cargo on board). It is clear what they are banking on: launching a propaganda machine and playing the food card with the help of Westerners and the UN.

Brussels and Washington wasted no time: first, the High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, and then US Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced that Russia allegedly broke its promises to the countries in need of grain and blocked 50 ships in the Black Sea.

The EU did not stop there and expressed a belief that is striking in its absurdity and amateurishness: the sanctions imposed on Russia are so well calibrated and balanced that they do not interfere with Russia’s agricultural exports, an example of which is the supply of Russian grain under the Black Sea Initiative.

Unfortunately, Brussels still has not figured out that only Ukrainian food is being exported across the Black Sea under the grain deal."
Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova 19 April 2023